Advertisement
Brief report| Volume 96, ISSUE 1, P154-157, January 2015

Download started.

Ok

Mediolateral Joint Powers at the Low Back Among Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation

  • Brad D. Hendershot
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Brad D. Hendershot, PhD, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, America Bld (19), Rm B-322, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889.
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
    Search for articles by this author
  • Erik J. Wolf
    Affiliations
    Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

    Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs, Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD
    Search for articles by this author
Published:August 04, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.402

      Abstract

      Objective

      To analyze mediolateral joint powers at the low back during gait among persons with and without unilateral transfemoral amputation to better understand the functional contributions of tissues in and around the low back to altered lateral trunk movements in this population.

      Design

      Retrospective analysis of biomechanical gait data.

      Setting

      Gait laboratory.

      Participants

      Twenty persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation and 20 uninjured controls (N=40).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Net joint powers, and total generation (+) and absorption (−) energies, at the low back (L5/S1 spinal level) were analyzed in the frontal plane using inverse dynamics analyses on over-ground gait data collected at self-selected walking speeds (∼1.3m/s).

      Results

      Compared with uninjured controls, 4 distinctly larger positive phases of mediolateral joint power at L5/S1 were evident in persons with transfemoral amputation, occurring before and after each heel strike. Total generation energies throughout the gait cycle were also larger (P<.001) among persons with transfemoral amputation (4.8±1.4J) than among uninjured controls (1.3±0.7J).

      Conclusions

      Larger positive phases of joint power at L5/S1 in the frontal plane support previous suggestions that persons with transfemoral amputation use a more active mediolateral trunk movement strategy, although such an active trunk movement strategy with transfemoral amputation may contribute to higher metabolic energy expenditures and low back pain risk.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hof A.L.
        • van Bockel R.M.
        • Schoppen T.
        • Postema K.
        Control of lateral balance in walking: experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.
        Gait Posture. 2007; 25: 250-258
        • MacKinnon C.D.
        • Winter D.A.
        Control of whole body balance in the frontal plane during human walking.
        J Biomech. 1993; 26: 633-644
        • Winter D.A.
        • Robertson D.G.
        Joint torque and energy patterns in normal gait.
        Biol Cybern. 1978; 29: 137-142
        • Goujon-Pillet H.
        • Sapin E.
        • Fodé P.
        • Lavaste F.
        Three-dimensional motions of trunk and pelvis during transfemoral amputee gait.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 87-94
        • Jaegers S.M.
        • Arendzen J.H.
        • de Jongh H.J.
        Prosthetic gait of unilateral transfemoral amputees: a kinematic study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 736-743
        • Robertson D.G.
        • Winter D.A.
        Mechanical energy generation, absorption, and transfer amongst segments during walking.
        J Biomech. 1980; 13: 845-854
        • Hendershot B.D.
        • Wolf E.J.
        Three-dimensional joint reaction forces and moments at the low back during over-ground walking in persons with unilateral lower-extremity amputation.
        Clin Biomech. 2014; 29: 235-242
        • Eng J.J.
        • Winter D.A.
        Kinetic analysis of the lower limbs during walking: what information can be gained from a three-dimensional model?.
        J Biomech. 1995; 28: 753-758
        • Mündermann A.
        • Asay J.L.
        • Mündermann L.
        • Andriacchi T.P.
        Implications of increased medio-lateral trunk sway for ambulatory mechanics.
        J Biomech. 2008; 41: 165-170
        • Molina Rueda F.
        • Alquacil Diego I.M.
        • Molero Sánchez A.
        • Carratalá Tejada M.
        • Rivas Montero F.M.
        • Miangolarra Page J.C.
        Knee and hip internal moments and upper-body kinematics in the frontal plane in unilateral transtibial amputees.
        Gait Posture. 2013; 37: 436-439
        • Michaud S.B.
        • Gard S.A.
        • Childress D.S.
        A preliminary investigation of pelvic obliquity patterns during gait in persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputation.
        J Rehabili Res Dev. 2000; 37: 1-10
        • Bell J.C.
        • Wolf E.J.
        • Schnall B.L.
        • Tis J.E.
        • Tis L.L.
        • Potter B.K.
        Transfemoral amputations: the effect of residual limb length and orientation on gait analysis outcome measures.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2013; 95: 408-414
        • Zajac F.E.
        • Neptune R.R.
        • Kautz S.A.
        Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking, part I: introduction to concepts, power transfer, dynamics and simulations.
        Gait Posture. 2002; 16: 215-232
        • Granata K.P.
        • Marras W.S.
        The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 913-919
        • Hunt M.A.
        • Simic M.
        • Hinman R.S.
        • Bennell K.L.
        • Wrigley T.V.
        Feasibility of a gait retraining strategy for reducing knee joint loading: increased trunk lean guided by real-time biofeedback.
        J Biomech. 2011; 44: 943-947
        • Bigland-Ritchie B.
        • Woods J.J.
        Integrated electromyogram and oxygen uptake during positive and negative work.
        J Physiol. 1976; 260: 267-277