Special communication| Volume 96, ISSUE 3, SUPPLEMENT , S33-S37, March 2015

Download started.


Brain-Computer Interface Users Speak Up: The Virtual Users' Forum at the 2013 International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting


      More than 300 researchers gathered at the 2013 International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting to discuss current practice and future goals for BCI research and development. The authors organized the Virtual Users' Forum at the meeting to provide the BCI community with feedback from users. We report on the Virtual Users' Forum, including initial results from ongoing research being conducted by 2 BCI groups. Online surveys and in-person interviews were used to solicit feedback from people with disabilities who are expert and novice BCI users. For the Virtual Users' Forum, their responses were organized into 4 major themes: current (non-BCI) communication methods, experiences with BCI research, challenges of current BCIs, and future BCI developments. Two authors with severe disabilities gave presentations during the Virtual Users' Forum, and their comments are integrated with the other results. While participants' hopes for BCIs of the future remain high, their comments about available systems mirror those made by consumers about conventional assistive technology. They reflect concerns about reliability (eg, typing accuracy/speed), utility (eg, applications and the desire for real-time interactions), ease of use (eg, portability and system setup), and support (eg, technical support and caregiver training). People with disabilities, as target users of BCI systems, can provide valuable feedback and input on the development of BCI as an assistive technology. To this end, participatory action research should be considered as a valuable methodology for future BCI research.


      List of abbreviations:

      AAC (augmentative and alternative communication), BCI (brain-computer interface), OHSU (Oregon Health & Science University), PAR (participatory action research), PTNR (Program for Translational Neurological Research), RSVP (rapid serial visual presentation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Wolpaw J.R.
        • Wolpaw E.W.
        Brain-computer interfaces: something new under the sun.
        in: Wolpaw J.R. Wolpaw E.W. Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice. Oxford University Pr, New York2012: 3-12
        • Fager S.
        • Beukelman D.R.
        • Fried-Oken M.
        • Jakobs T.
        • Baker J.
        Access interface strategies.
        Assist Technol. 2012; 24: 25-33
        • Baum F.
        • MacDougall C.
        • Smith D.
        Participatory action research.
        J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60: 854
        • Cornwall A.
        • Jewkes R.
        What is participatory research?.
        Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41: 1667-1676
        • Abras C.
        • Maloney-Krichmar D.
        • Preece J.
        User-centered design.
        in: Bainbridge W.S. Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks2004: 445-456
        • Huggins J.E.
        • Wren P.A.
        • Gruis K.L.
        What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
        Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011; 12: 318-324
        • Blain-Moraes S.
        • Schaff R.
        • Gruis K.L.
        • Huggins J.E.
        • Wren P.A.
        Barriers to and mediators of brain-computer interface user acceptance: Focus group findings.
        Ergonomics. 2012; 55: 516-525
        • Fried-Oken M.
        • Howard J.
        • Stewart S.R.
        Feedback on AAC intervention from adults who are temporarily unable to speak.
        Augment Altern Commun. 1991; 7: 43-50
      1. Bieker G, Noethe G, Fried-Oken M. Brain-computer interface: locked-in and reaching new heights. SpeakUP. USSAAC Newsletter 2011;Dec:3–6.

        • Lund S.K.
        • Light J.
        Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part III—contributing factors.
        Augment Altern Commun. 2007; 23: 323-335
        • Zickler C.
        • Di Donna V.
        • Kaiser V.
        • et al.
        BCI applications for people with disabilities: defining user needs and user requirements. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A-L, editors. Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments.
        Assist Technol Res Ser. 2009; 25: 185-189
      2. Huggins JE. BCI Meeting 2013. Available at: Accessed December 17, 2013.

        • Farwell L.A.
        • Donchin E.
        Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988; 70: 510-523
        • Sellers E.W.
        • Vaughan T.M.
        • Wolpaw J.R.
        A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use.
        Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2010; 11: 449-455
        • Vaughan T.M.
        • Sellers E.W.
        • Wolpaw J.R.
        Clinical evaluation of BCIs.
        in: Wolpaw J.R. Wolpaw E.W. Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice. Oxford University Pr, New York2012: 81-103
        • Winden S.
        • Carmack C.S.
        • Corda D.E.
        • et al.
        BCI-360: full-service support for independent home-based BCI use and for translational studies.
        in: Neuroscience 2012 abstracts; 2012 Oct 13-17; New Orleans, LA. Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans2012
        • Orhan U.
        • Erdogmus D.
        • Roark B.
        • et al.
        Improved accuracy using recursive Bayesian estimation based language model fusion in ERP-based BCI typing systems.
        in: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2012 Aug 28-Sep 1; San Diego, CA. IEEE, 2012: 2497-2500
        • Orhan U.
        • Hild II, K.E.
        • Erdogmus D.
        • Roark B.
        • Oken B.
        • Fried-Oken M.
        RSVP keyboard: an EEG based typing interface.
        in: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2012; 2012 Mar 25-30; Kyoto (Japan). 2012: 645-648
        • Orhan U.
        • Erdogmus D.
        • Roark B.
        • Oken B.
        • Fried-Oken M.
        Offline analysis of context contribution to ERP-based typing BCI performance.
        J Neural Eng. 2013; 10: 066003
        • Oken B.S.
        • Orhan U.
        • Roark B.
        • et al.
        Brain-computer interface with language model-electroencephalography fusion for locked-in syndrome.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014; 28: 387-394
        • Cook A.
        • Polgar J.
        Cook and Hussey's assistive technologies: principles and practice.
        3rd ed. Mosby, St. Louis2007
        • Hochberg L.R.
        • Anderson K.D.
        BCI users and their needs.
        in: Wolpaw J.R. Wolpaw E.W. Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice. Oxford University Pr, New York2012: 317-323
        • Akcakaya M.
        • Peters B.
        • Moghadamfalahi M.
        • Mooney A.
        • Orhan U.
        Noninvasive brain computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication.
        IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014; 7: 31-49
        • Millán J.D.
        • Rupp R.
        • Müller-Putz G.R.
        • et al.
        Combining brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges.
        Front Neurosci. 2010; 4: 161
        • Guenther F.H.
        • Brumberg J.S.
        • Wright E.J.
        • et al.
        A wireless brain-machine interface for real-time speech synthesis.
        PLoS One. 2009; 4: e8218
        • Guenther F.H.
        • Brumberg J.S.
        Brain-machine interfaces for real-time speech synthesis.
        in: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2011 Aug 30-Sep 3; Boston, MA. IEEE, 2011: 5360-5363
        • Zickler C.
        • Riccio A.
        • Leotta F.
        • et al.
        A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software.
        Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011; 42: 236-244