Advertisement

Are We Asking the Right Question About Postacute Settings of Care?

  • Gerben DeJong
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author Gerben DeJong, PhD, FACRM, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, 102 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010.
    Affiliations
    MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; and MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 04, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.014

      Abstract

      This issue of Archives includes an article by Mallinson et al that compares the outcomes of patients with hip fracture who received rehabilitation services in 3 different postacute settings: skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, or home health. Except in 1 instance, Mallinson found no setting-specific effects and noted that the issue of defining an optimum postacute rehabilitation program is complex and requires more investigation. Mallinson's findings are interesting in their own right but raise a more fundamental issue. This commentary observes that rehabilitation patients typically use multiple postacute settings, not just 1 setting of care, for the same episode of care. This commentary asks whether we should be examining episode outcomes and not just setting-specific outcomes, especially in the face of bundled payment and value-based payment reforms in the Affordable Care Act.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      BPCI (Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Initiative), CARE (Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation), CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), DRG (diagnosis-related group), IRF (inpatient rehabilitation facility), LTCH (long-term care hospital), MDS (Minimum Data Set), SNF (skilled nursing facility)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mallison T.
        • Deutsch A.
        • Bateman J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of discharge functional status after rehabilitation in skilled nursing, home health, and medical rehabilitation settings for patients after hip fracture repair.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul 10; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Deutsch A.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Fiedler R.C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs for Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture.
        Med Care. 2005; 43: 892-901
        • Kramer A.M.
        • Steiner J.F.
        • Schlenker R.E.
        Outcomes and costs after hip fracture and stroke: a comparison of rehabilitation settings.
        JAMA. 1997; 227: 396-404
        • Munin M.
        • Seligman K.
        • Dew M.
        • et al.
        Effect of rehabilitation site on functional recovery after hip fracture.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 367-372
        • Walsh M.
        • Herbold J.
        Outcome after rehabilitation for total joint replacement at IRF and SNF: a case-controlled comparison.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 85: 1-5
        • Buntin M.B.
        • Colla C.H.
        • Deb P.
        • Sood N.
        • Escarce J.J.
        Medicare spending and outcomes after postacute care for stroke and hip fracture.
        Med Care. 2010; 48: 776-784
        • Tian W.
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Putman K.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • DaVanzo J.E.
        Efficient rehabilitation care for joint replacement patients: skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation facility?.
        Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 176-187
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Smout R.J.
        • Tian W.
        • Putman K.
        • Gassaway J.
        Joint replacement rehabilitation outcomes on discharge from skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1284-1296
        • Chan L.
        • Sandel M.E.
        • Jette A.M.
        • et al.
        Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 622-629
        • MaCurdy T.
        • Bhattacharya J.
        • Perlroth D.
        • et al.
        Geographic variation in spending, utilization and quality: Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries. A report prepared for the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-value Care.
        Acumen LLC, Burlingame2013 (Available at:) (Accessed August 3, 2013)
      1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111-148; March 23, 2010, 111th Congress, §3021. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2013.

      2. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111-148; March 23, 2010, 111th Congress, §3021 and §10308. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2013.

        • Buntin M.
        • Garten A.
        • Paddock S.
        • Saliba D.
        • Totten M.
        • Escarce J.
        How much is postacute care affected by its availability?.
        Health Serv Res. 2005; 40: 413-434
      3. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Health care spending and the Medicare program. Available at http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun13DataBookEntireReport.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2013.

      4. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. March 2013 Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar13_entirereport.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2013.

      5. American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association. An option for the future of medical rehabilitation and other post acute hospital providers: the continuing care hospital. May 4, 2009. Available at: http://www.amrpa.org/uploads/docuploads/CCH%20concepts%20paper.pdf. Accessed August 3, 2013.

      6. Melvin JL. The minimal data set for post-acute care: A HCFA initiative in post-acute care assessment. 1998. Available at: http://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=hpn. Accessed August 3, 2013.

      7. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111-148; March 23, 2010, 111th Congress, §3021. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2013.

        • Bade M.J.
        • Stevens-Lapsley J.E.
        Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 41: 932-941
        • Horn S.D.
        • DeJong G.
        • Smout R.J.
        • Gassaway J.
        • James R.
        • Conroy B.
        Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better?.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S101-S114
        • Kwakkel G.
        • Wagenaar R.C.
        • Koelman T.W.
        • Lankhorst G.J.
        • Koetsier J.C.
        Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis.
        Stroke. 1997; 28: 1550-1556
        • Maulden S.A.
        • Gassaway J.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Smout R.J.
        • DeJong G.
        Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S34-S40
        • Teasell R.
        • Bitensky J.
        • Salter K.
        • Bayona N.A.
        The role of timing and intensity of rehabilitation therapies.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005; 12: 46-57
        • Jette D.U.
        • Warren R.L.
        • Wirtalla C.
        The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 373-379
        • Chen C.C.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Linn R.T.
        Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1514-1523
      8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: general information. Available at: http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/. Accessed August 3, 2013.