Abstract
Objective
To determine the incidence, course, and prognosis of adult mild traumatic brain injury
(MTBI) caused by motor vehicle collisions.
Design
Prospective, population-based, inception cohort study.
Setting
The province of Saskatchewan, Canada, with a population of about 1,000,000 inhabitants.
Participants
All adults (N=1716) incurring an MTBI in a motor vehicle collision between November
1997 and December 1999 in Saskatchewan.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Age- and sex-stratified incidence rates, time to self-reported recovery, and prognostic
factors over a 1-year follow-up.
Results
Of 7170 adults injured in a motor vehicle collision over the 2-year inception period,
1716 (24%) met our cohort definition of MTBI. There were more women affected (53%),
and MTBI was most common in the 18- to 23-year-old group. Most were not hospitalized
(73%), but 28% reported loss of consciousness and 23% reported posttraumatic amnesia.
The annual incidence of MTBI per 100,000 adults was 106.1 (95% confidence interval
[CI], 98.9–113.6) in the first year and 118.3 (95% CI, 110.8–126.3) in the second
year of the study. The 1-year follow-up rate was 84%. The median time to recovery
was 100 days (95% CI, 97–103), and about 23% reported not having recovered by 1 year.
Factors associated with delayed recovery included being older than 50 years, having
less than a high school education, having poor expectations for recovery, having depressive
symptoms, having arm numbness, having hearing problems, having headaches, having low
back pain, and having thoracic back pain. Loss of consciousness and posttraumatic
amnesia were not associated with recovery.
Conclusions
MTBI affects almost a quarter of persons reporting an injury after a traffic collision.
The median time to recovery is 100 days, but 23% have still not recovered by 1 year.
A mix of biopsychosocial factors is associated with recovery, including a strong effect
of poor expectations for recovery.
Keywords
List of abbreviations:
LOC (loss of consciousness), MTBI (mild traumatic brain injury), PTA (posttraumatic amnesia), SGI (Saskatchewan Government Insurance)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.J Rehabil Med. 2004; 36: 28-60
- Traumatic brain injuries in a well-defined population: epidemiological aspects and severity.J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24: 1425-1436
- Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury: the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.J Rehabil Med. 2004; 36: 113-125
- Cross-cultural study of symptom expectation following minor head injury in Canada and Greece.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001; 103: 254-259
- Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.J Rehabil Med. 2004; 36: 84-105
- Function after motor vehicle accidents: a prospective study of mild head injury and posttraumatic stress.J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001; 189: 426-434
- Mild traumatic brain injury after traffic collisions: a population-based inception cohort study.J Rehabil Med. 2004; 36: 15-21
- The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.Pain. 1986; 27: 117-126
- The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), I: conceptual framework and item selection.Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
- Measuring depressive symptoms in illness populations: psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale.Psychol Health. 1988; 2: 139-156
Jaroszynski G, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Côté P, Yong-Hing K. Development and validation of a comorbidity scale. Presented at the Canadian Orthopaedic Research Association Convention, Quebec City, PQ, June 1996.
- Assessing the performance of a self-report comorbidity scale [dissertation].Univ of Alberta, Edmonton2006
- A study of the test-retest reliability of the self-perceived general recovery and self-perceived change in neck pain questions in patients with recent whiplash-associated disorders.Eur Spine J. 2010; 19: 957-962
- How well are you recovering? The association between a simple question about recovery and patient reports of pain intensity and pain disability in whiplash-associated disorders.Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 45-52
Health insurance registration: covered population. Regina (Canada): Government of Saskatchewan; 1997-1999.
- A re-examination of the whiplash associated disorders (WAD) as a systemic illness.Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64: 1337-1342
- When a minor head injury results in enduring symptoms: a prospective investigation of risk factors for postconcussional syndrome after mild traumatic brain injury.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012; 83: 217-223
- Expectations for recovery important in the prognosis of whiplash injuries.PLoS Med. 2008; 5: e105
- Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries.Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60: 244-253
- Perceived cognitive deficits, emotional distress and disability following whiplash injury.Pain Res Manag. 2002; 7: 120-126
- Cerebral symptoms following whiplash injury.Eur Neurol. 1991; 31: 136-140
- Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?.Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19: 751-760
- A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature.Spine. 2001; 26: E445-E458
Article info
Footnotes
Supported by the Saskatchewan Government Insurance. The funder was not involved in the design or preparation of the study protocol, or in the management of the project, analysis or interpretation of data, or the preparation of the final article.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
