Advertisement

Toward a Theory-Driven Classification of Rehabilitation Treatments

      Abstract

      Rehabilitation is in need of an organized system or taxonomy for classifying treatments to aid in research, practice, training, and interdisciplinary communication. In this article, we describe a work-in-progress effort to create a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy (RTT) for classifying rehabilitation interventions by the underlying treatment theories that explain their effects. In the RTT, treatments are grouped together according to their targets, or measurable aspects of functioning they are intended to change; ingredients, or measurable clinician decisions and behaviors responsible for effecting changes; and the hypothesized mechanisms of action by which ingredients are transformed into changes in the target. Four treatment groupings are proposed: structural tissue properties, organ functions, skilled performances, and cognitive/affective representations, which are similar in the types of targets addressed, ingredients used, and mechanisms of action that account for change. The typical ingredients and examples of clinical treatments associated with each of these groupings are explored, and the challenges of further subdivision are discussed. Although a Linnaean hierarchical tree structure was envisioned at the outset of work on the RTT, further development may necessitate a model with less rigid boundaries between classification groups, and/or a matrix-like structure for organizing active ingredients along selected continua, to allow for both qualitative and quantitative variations of importance to treatment effects.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), RTT (rehabilitation treatment taxonomy)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lambe P.
        Organising knowledge: taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness.
        Chandos Publishing, Oxford2007
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • Tsaouside T.
        • Whyte J.
        • Zanca J.M.
        Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: past, present and prospects.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S6-S16
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.
        • Gassaway J.
        • Slavin M.
        • Dijkers M.
        Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 678-686
        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Semik P.
        • Mallinson T.
        Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the black box of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1901-1908
        • Horn S.D.
        • DeJong G.
        • Ryser D.K.
        • Veazie P.J.
        • Teraoka J.
        Another look at observational studies in rehabilitation research: going beyond the holy grail of the randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S8-15
        • Michie S.
        • Prestwich A.
        Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme.
        Health Psychol. 2010; 29: 1-8
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • Whyte J.
        • Zanca J.M.
        • Packel A.
        • Tsaousides T.
        Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: implications and continuations.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S45-S54
      1. Keith RA. The role of treatment theory. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: the promise of outcomes research. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 1997. p 257-274.

        • Whyte J.
        Contributions of treatment theory and enablement theory to rehabilitation research theory and practice.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S17-S23
      2. Keith RA, Lipsey M. The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment, and outcomes. In: Glueckauf R, Sechrest L, Bond G, McDonel E, editors. Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p 33-58.

        • Whyte J.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • et al.
        Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: conceptual issues.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S24-S32
        • Cirstea M.C.
        • Levin M.F.
        Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 398-411
        • Peled A.
        • Karniel A.
        Knowledge of performance is insufficient for implicit visuomotor rotation adaptation.
        J Mot Behav. 2012; 44: 185-194
        • Boyd L.A.
        • Winstein C.J.
        Impact of explicit information on implicit motor-sequence learning following middle cerebral artery stroke.
        Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 976-989
        • Wulf G.
        • Chiviacowsky S.
        • Schiller E.
        • Avila L.T.
        Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning.
        Front Psychol. 2010; 1: 190
        • Hart T.
        Treatment definition in complex rehabilitation interventions.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009; 19: 824-840
        • Glenn J.
        Restorative nursing bladder training program: recommending a strategy.
        Rehabil Nurs. 2003; 28: 15-22
        • Pohl M.
        • Ruckriem S.
        • Mehrholz J.
        • Ritschel C.
        • Strik H.
        • Pause M.R.
        Effectiveness of serial casting in patients with severe cerebral spasticity: a comparison study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 784-790
        • Patterson D.R.
        • Jensen M.P.
        • Wiechman S.A.
        • Sharar S.R.
        Virtual reality hypnosis for pain associated with recovery from physical trauma.
        Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2010; 58: 288-300
        • Brooks D.
        • Sidani S.
        • Graydon J.
        • McBride S.
        • Hall L.
        • Weinacht K.
        Evaluating the effects of music on dyspnea during exercise in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pilot study.
        Rehabil Nurs. 2003; 28: 192-196
        • Ormrod J.E.
        Human learning.
        3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River1999
        • Shanks D.R.
        Learning: from association to cognition.
        Annu Rev Psychol. 2010; 61: 273-301
        • Hart T.
        • Fann J.
        • Novack T.
        The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioral treatment research.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008; 18: 1-21
        • Fuhrer M.J.
        • Keith R.A.
        Facilitating patient learning during medical rehabilitation.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 557-561
        • Ehlhardt L.A.
        • Sohlberg M.M.
        • Kennedy M.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years?.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008; 18: 300-342
        • Hart T.
        • Powell J.M.
        Principles of learning in TBI rehabilitation.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011; 26: 179-181
        • Schweighofer N.
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Goh H.T.
        • et al.
        Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke.
        J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106: 2632-2641
        • Vygotsky L.
        Mind and society: the development of higher psychological processes.
        Harvard Univ Pr, Cambridge1978
        • Massie C.
        • Malcolm M.P.
        • Greene D.
        • Thaut M.
        The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 571-579
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
        World Health Organization, Geneva2001
        • Hart T.
        • Ferraro M.
        • Myers R.
        • Ellis C.A.
        Opening the black box: lessons learned from an interdisciplinary inquiry into the learning-based contents of brain injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S66-S73
        • Hart T.
        • Evans J.
        Self-regulation and goal theories in brain injury rehabilitation.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21: 142-155
        • Clare L.
        • Jones R.S.
        Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impairment: a critical review.
        Neuropsychol Rev. 2008; 18: 1-23
        • Poldrack R.A.
        • Packard M.G.
        Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies.
        Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41: 245-251
        • Murre J.M.
        Implicit and explicit memory in amnesia: some explanations and predictions by the tracelink model.
        Memory. 1997; 5: 213-232
        • Sun R.
        • Slusarz P.
        • Terry C.
        The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach.
        Psychol Rev. 2005; 112: 159-192
        • Willingham D.B.
        • Nissen M.J.
        • Bullemer P.
        On the development of procedural knowledge.
        J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15: 1047-1060
        • Ewert J.
        • Levin H.S.
        • Watson M.G.
        • Kalisky Z.
        Procedural memory during posttraumatic amnesia in survivors of severe closed head injury: implications for rehabilitation.
        Arch Neurol. 1989; 46: 911-916
        • Ptak R.
        • Gurbrod K.
        • Schnider A.
        Association learning in the acute confusional state.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998; 65: 390-392
        • Cavaco S.
        • Anderson S.W.
        • Allen J.S.
        • Castro-Caldas A.
        • Damasio H.
        The scope of preserved procedural memory in amnesia.
        Brain. 2004; 127: 1853-1867
        • Ptak R.
        • der Linden M.V.
        • Schnider A.
        Cognitive rehabilitation of episodic memory disorders: from theory to practice.
        Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4
        • Vidoni E.D.
        • Boyd L.A.
        Achieving enlightenment: what do we know about the implicit learning system and its interaction with explicit knowledge?.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007; 31: 145-154
        • Meeus M.
        • Nijs J.
        • Van Oosterwijck J.
        • Van Alsenoy V.
        • Truijen S.
        Pain physiology education improves pain beliefs in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared with pacing and self-management education: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1153-1159
        • Lowe R.
        • Ziemke T.
        The feeling of action tendencies: on the emotional regulation of goal-directed behavior.
        Front Psychol. 2011; 2: 346
        • Prochaska J.O.
        • DiClemente C.C.
        The transtheoretical approach.
        in: Norcross J.C. Goldfried M.R. Handbook of psychotherapy integration. Oxford Univ Pr, New York2005: 147-171
        • Kazdin A.E.
        Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research.
        Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007; 3: 1-27
        • Miller W.R.
        • Rose G.S.
        Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.
        Am Psychol. 2009; 64: 527-537
        • Abraham C.
        • Michie S.
        A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions.
        Health Psychol. 2008; 27: 379-387
        • Michie S.
        • van Stralen M.M.
        • West R.
        The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.
        Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 42
        • Schultz R.
        • Czaja S.J.
        • McKay J.R.
        • Ory M.G.
        • Belle S.H.
        Intervention taxonomy (ITAX): describing essential features of interventions.
        Am J Health Behav. 2010; 34: 811-821
        • Lorig K.
        • Holman H.
        Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms.
        Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26: 1-7
        • Siemonsma P.C.
        • Schroder C.D.
        • Dekker J.H.
        • Lettinga A.T.
        The benefits of theory for clinical practice: cognitive treatment for chronic low back pain patients as an illustrative example.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30: 1309-1317
        • Siemonsma P.C.
        • Schroder C.D.
        • Roorda L.D.
        • Lettinga A.T.
        Benefits of treatment theory in the design of explanatory trials: cognitive treatment of illness perception in chronic low back pain rehabilitation as an illustrative example.
        J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42: 111-116
      3. Blanchard DL. The ABC's of animal taxonomy. The Cold Blooded News (Newsletter of the Colorado Herpetological Society). Available at: http://www.dlblanc.com/coloherp/cb-news/archive/taxonomy/Taxonomy.php. Accessed November 19, 2013.