Advertisement
Original article| Volume 95, ISSUE 2, P276-282, February 2014

Download started.

Ok

Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Clinical Practice: An Online Survey

Published:September 10, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.240

      Abstract

      Objective

      To investigate current knowledge and application in practice of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) by therapists within the United Kingdom.

      Design

      An online 19-item survey.

      Setting

      Neurological rehabilitation.

      Participants

      Occupational therapists and physiotherapists (N=489) currently working or within 3 months of working with the adult acquired brain injury population were recruited from 2 specialist interest groups.

      Interventions

      Database administrators of 2 specialist interest groups circulated an e-mail to all therapists on the database to invite them to complete the online survey.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Not applicable.

      Results

      Most therapists (62.9%, n=306) had not used CIMT. Those who had used it were only using 2 or 3 components of the core 7-component CIMT protocol. Therapists identified 2 main barriers to the implementation of CIMT: lack of resources (staffing; 20.7%, n=63) and lack of training (20%, n=61).

      Conclusions

      Adoption into practice remains limited. Despite a significant evidence base in support of CIMT, most therapists are not using CIMT in practice. This article indicates how concerns and barriers related to CIMT may be minimized to translate this robust intervention from research into clinical practice.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ABI (acquired brain injury), CIMT (constraint-induced movement therapy), EXCITE (Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (trial)), TBI (traumatic brain injury), UK (United Kingdom)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Parker V.M.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Langton Hewer R.
        Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency and recovery.
        Int Rehabil Med. 1986; 8: 69-73
        • Higgins J.
        • Mayo N.E.
        • Desrosiers J.
        • Salbach N.M.
        • Ahmed S.
        Upper limb function and recovery in the acute phase post stroke.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005; 42: 65-76
        • Blanton S.
        • Wilsey H.
        • Wolf S.L.
        Constraint induced movement therapy in stroke rehabilitation: perspectives on future clinical applications.
        NeuroRehabilitation. 2008; 23: 15-28
        • Bonaiuti D.
        • Rebasti L.
        • Sioli P.
        The constraint induced movement therapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials on the adult stroke patients.
        Eura Medicophys. 2007; 43: 139-146
        • Bjorklund A.
        • Fecht A.
        The effectiveness of constraint-induced therapy as a stroke intervention: a meta-analysis.
        Occup Ther Health Care. 2006; 20: 31-49
        • Hakkennes S.
        • Keating J.L.
        Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
        Aust J Physiother. 2005; 51: 221-231
        • Langhorne P.
        • Coupar F.
        • Pollock A.
        Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.
        Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 741-754
        • Oujamaa L.
        • Relave I.
        • Froger J.
        • Mottet D.
        • Pelissier J.Y.
        Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review.
        Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009; 52: 269-293
        • Morris D.M.
        • Taub E.
        • Mark V.W.
        Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol.
        Eura Medicophys. 2006; 42: 257-268
        • Page S.J.
        • Levine P.
        • Leonard A.
        • Szaflarski J.P.
        • Kissela B.M.
        Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke: results of a single blinded randomized controlled trial.
        Phys Ther. 2008; 88: 1-8
        • Wolf S.L.
        • Winstein C.J.
        • Miller J.P.
        • et al.
        Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 2095-2104
        • Page S.J.
        • Levine P.
        • Sisto S.
        • Bond Q.
        • Johnston M.V.
        Stroke patients and therapist's opinions of constraint induced movement therapy.
        Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 55-60
        • Daniel L.
        • Howard W.
        • Braun D.
        • Page S.J.
        Opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy among therapists in southwestern Ohio.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012; 19: 268-275
        • Eigbogba B.
        • Pedlow K.
        • Lennon S.
        Constraint induced movement therapy for the upper limb post stroke: a postal survey of therapists in Ireland.
        Phys Ther Rev. 2010; 15: 121
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Zorowitz R.
        • Bates B.
        • et al.
        Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline.
        Stroke. 2005; 36: 100-143
        • Van Peppen R.P.S.
        • Kwakkel G.
        • Harmeling-van der Wel B.C.
        • et al.
        KNGF Clinical Practice Guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Review of the evidence [translation 2008].
        Ned Tijdschr Fysiother. 2004; : 114
        • Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party
        National clinical guideline for stroke.
        4th ed. Royal College of Physicians, London2012
        • Evans J.
        • Mathur A.
        The value of online surveys.
        Internet Res. 2005; 15: 196-219
        • Schmidt W.C.
        World-Wide Web survey research: benefits, potential problems, and solutions.
        Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1997; 29: 274-279
        • Kalra L.
        • Dale P.
        • Crome P.
        Improving stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study.
        Stroke. 1993; 24: 1462-1467
        • Boake C.
        • Noser E.A.
        • Ro T.
        • et al.
        Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21: 14-24