Advertisement
Original article| Volume 95, ISSUE 2, P262-268, February 2014

Participation and Well-Being Poststroke: Evidence of Reciprocal Effects

Published:September 03, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.013

      Abstract

      Objective

      To explore reciprocal effects between participation and emotional and physical well-being during the first 2 years poststroke.

      Design

      Prospective cohort study.

      Setting

      Community.

      Participants

      An inception cohort of adults (N=67) who had been discharged from an acute stroke unit or stroke rehabilitation unit after a first stroke.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Participation (Reintegration to Normal Living Index), emotional well-being (General Well-being Schedule), and physical well-being (General Self-rating of Health Question) were measured at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months poststroke. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the association between participation and change in well-being, controlling for sex, age, impairment (discharge FIM), and median neighborhood income.

      Results

      Greater engagement in valued activities was significantly associated with subsequent improvement in emotional well-being. The effect of participation on change in physical well-being was marginal. Higher levels of well-being also predicted subsequent increases in participation, with emotional well-being effects moderated by income, and physical well-being effects moderated by level of impairment.

      Conclusions

      Our results support a 2-pronged approach to addressing well-being poststroke where efforts to improve affect and boost participation are simultaneously applied.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      GHQ (General Self-rating of Health Question), GWB (General Well-being Schedule), ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient), ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), RNLI (Reintegration to Normal Living Index)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Edwards D.F.
        • Hahn M.
        • Baum C.
        • Dromerick A.W.
        The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction.
        J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 15: 151-157
        • Carlsson G.
        • Möller A.
        • Blomstrand C.
        Managing an everyday life of uncertainty: a qualitative study of coping in persons with mild stroke.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 773-782
        • Clarke P.
        Towards a greater understanding of the experience of stroke: integrating quantitative and qualitative methods.
        J Aging Stud. 2003; 17: 171-187
        • Eriksson G.
        • Tham K.
        The meaning of occupational gaps in everyday life in the first year after stroke.
        OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2010; 30: 184-192
        • Kvigne K.
        • Kirkevold M.
        • Gjengedal E.
        Fighting back—struggling to continue life and preserve the self following a stroke.
        Health Care Women Int. 2004; 25: 370-387
        • Wood J.P.
        • Connelly D.M.
        • Maly M.R.
        “Getting back to real living”: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24: 1045-1056
        • Bornman J.
        The World Health Organisation's terminology and classification: application to severe disability.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26: 182-188
        • Korner-Bitensky N.
        • Desrosiers J.
        • Rochette A.
        A national survey of occupational therapists' practices related to participation post stroke.
        J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40: 291-297
        • Weinstock-Zlotnick G.
        • Hinojosa J.
        Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: is one better than the other?.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2004; 58: 594-599
        • Berges I.M.
        • Seale G.
        • Ostir G.V.
        The role of positive affect on social participation following stroke.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 2119-2123
        • Schmid A.
        • Damush T.
        • Tu W.
        • et al.
        Depression improvement is related to social role functioning after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 978-982
        • Brock K.
        • Black S.
        • Cotton S.
        • Kennedy G.
        • Wilson S.
        • Sutton E.
        Goal achievement in the six months after inpatient rehabilitation for stroke.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31: 880-886
        • Chau J.P.C.
        • Thompson D.R.
        • Twinn S.
        • Chang A.M.
        • Woo J.
        Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: a path analysis.
        BMC Neurol. 2009; 9: 49
        • Hoffmann T.
        • McKenna K.
        • Cooke D.
        • Tooth L.
        Outcomes after stroke: basic and instrumental activities of daily living, community reintegration and generic health status.
        Aust Occup Ther J. 2003; 50: 225-233
        • Keith R.A.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        • Sherwin F.S.
        The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation.
        in: Eisenberg M.G. Grzesiak R.C. Advances in clinical rehabilitation. Springer, New York1987: 6-18
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.L.
        • Opzoomer M.A.
        • Williams J.I.
        • Marchand B.
        • Spitzer W.O.
        Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69: 583-590
        • Salter K.
        • Jutai J.W.
        • Teasell R.
        • Foley N.C.
        • Bitensky J.
        • Bayley M.
        Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2005; 27: 507-528
        • Hemmingsson H.
        • Johnsson H.
        An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health—some critical remarks.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2005; 59: 569-576
        • Stark S.L.
        • Edwards D.F.
        • Hollingsworth H.
        • Gray D.B.
        Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 344-345
        • Tooth L.R.
        • McKenna K.T.
        • Smith M.
        • O'Rourke P.K.
        Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 433-440
        • Mayo N.E.
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.
        • Cote R.
        • et al.
        There's no place like home: an evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke.
        Stroke. 2000; 31: 1016-1023
        • Price C.M.
        • Curless R.H.
        • Rodgers H.
        Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales?.
        Stroke. 1999; 30: 1357-1361
      1. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. p 125-33.

        • Fazio A.F.
        A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule.
        U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, National Centre for Health Statistics, Hyattsville1977 (Report No. 78-1347)
        • DeSalvo K.
        • Fan V.
        • McDonell M.
        • Fihn S.
        Predicting mortality and healthcare utilization with a single question.
        Health Serv Res. 2005; 40: 1234-1246
        • Idler E.
        • Benyamini Y.
        Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
        J Health Soc Behav. 1997; 38: 21-37
        • Kozlowski A.J.
        • Pretz C.R.
        • Dams-O'Connor K.
        • Kreider S.
        • Whiteneck G.
        An introduction to applying individual growth curve models to evaluate change in rehabilitation: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems report.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94: 589-596
        • Pan J.H.
        • Song X.Y.
        • Lee S.Y.
        • Kwok T.
        Longitudinal analysis of quality of life for stroke survivors using latent curve models.
        Stroke. 2008; 39: 2795-2802
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        • Bryk A.S.
        Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods.
        2nd ed. Sage, Newbury Park2002
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        • Bryk A.S.
        • Cheong Y.F.
        • Congdon Jr., R.T.
        • du Toit M.
        HLM 7: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling.
        Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood2011
        • Little R.J.A.
        A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83: 1198-1202
        • Hox J.
        Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications.
        2nd ed. Routledge, New York2010
        • De Sepulveda L.I.B.
        • Chang B.
        Effective coping with stroke disability in a community setting: the development of a causal model.
        J Neurosci Nurs. 1994; 26: 193-203
        • Mayo N.E.
        • Fellows L.K.
        • Scott S.C.
        • Cameron J.
        • Wood-Dauphinee S.
        A longitudinal view of apathy and its impact after stroke.
        Stroke. 2009; 40: 3299-3307
        • Williamson G.
        • Shaffer D.
        The activity restriction model of depressed affect.
        in: Williamson G.M. Shaffer D.R. Parmelee P.A. Physical illness and depression in older adults. Kluver Academics/Plenum Publishers, New York2000: 173-200
        • Landreville P.
        • Desrosiers J.
        • Vincent C.
        • Verreault R.
        • Boudreault V.
        • BRAD Group
        The role of activity restriction in poststroke depressive symptoms.
        Rehabil Psychol. 2009; 54: 315-322
        • Hackett M.L.
        • Anderson C.S.
        • House A.
        • Xia J.
        Interventions for treating depression after stroke.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008; : CD003437
        • Lund A.
        • Michelet M.
        • Sandvik L.
        • Wyller T.
        • Sveen U.
        A lifestyle intervention as supplement to a physical activity programme in rehabilitation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
        Clin Rehabil. 2012; 26: 502-512
        • Graven C.
        • Brock K.
        • Hill K.
        • Joubert L.
        Are rehabilitation and/or care co-ordination interventions delivered in the community effective in reducing depression, facilitating participation and improving quality of life after stroke?.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33: 1501-1520
        • Steultjens E.M.
        • Dekker J.
        • Bouter L.M.
        • van de Nes J.C.
        • Cup E.H.
        • van den Ende C.H.
        Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review.
        Stroke. 2003; 34: 676-687
        • McEwen S.E.
        • Polatajko H.J.
        • Huijbregts M.P.J.
        • Ryan J.D.
        Inter-task transfer of meaningful, functional skills following a cognitive-based treatment: results of three multiple baseline design experiments in adults with chronic stroke.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010; 20: 541-561
        • Polatajko H.
        • McEwen S.
        • Ryan J.
        • Baum C.
        Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2012; 66: 104-109
        • Baum C.M.
        Fulfilling the promise: supporting participation in daily life.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92: 169-175
        • Asplund K.
        Down with the class society [editorial]!.
        Stroke. 2003; 34: 2628-2629
        • Cesaroni G.
        • Agabiti N.
        • Forastiere F.
        • Perucci C.
        Socioeconomic differences in stroke incidence and prognosis under a universal healthcare system.
        Stroke. 2008; 40: 2812-2819
        • Kapral M.
        • Wang H.
        • Mamdani M.
        • Tu J.
        Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke.
        Stroke. 2002; 33: 268-275
        • Weir N.
        • Gunkel A.
        • McDowall M.
        • Dennis M.
        Study of the relationship between social deprivation and outcome after stroke.
        Stroke. 2005; 36: 815-819
        • Dhamoon M.S.
        • Moon Y.P.
        • Paik M.C.
        • et al.
        Quality of life declines after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.
        Neurology. 2010; 75: 328-334
        • Mayo N.E.
        • Wood-Dauphine S.
        • Cote R.
        • Durcam L.
        • Carleton J.
        Activity, participation and quality of life 6 months post stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1035-1042
        • Sturm J.W.
        • Dewey H.M.
        • Donnan G.A.
        • Macdonell R.A.L.
        • McNeil J.J.
        • Thrift A.G.
        Handicap after stroke: how does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype? The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS).
        Stroke. 2002; 33: 762-768
        • Kissela B.M.
        • Khoury J.C.
        • Alwell K.
        • et al.
        Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population.
        Neurology. 2012; 79: 1781-1787
        • Wolf T.J.
        • Baum C.
        • Connor L.T.
        Changing face of stroke: implications for occupational therapy practice.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2009; 63: 621-625