Advertisement
Department Letter to the Editor| Volume 93, ISSUE 11, P2130-2131, November 2012

Can Quality of Care Indicators Measure Quality of Care?

      We found the recent articles
      • Rivara F.P.
      • Ennis S.K.
      • Mangione-Smith R.
      • MacKenzie E.J.
      • Jaffe K.M.
      National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality Care Indicators
      Quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury.
      • Zumsteg J.M.
      • Ennis S.K.
      • Jaffe K.M.
      • et al.
      Quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
      and commentary
      • Whyte J.
      Invited commentary on quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury, and quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
      on quality of care measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) to be informative, thought-provoking, and yet somewhat disheartening. The work of the National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Quality of Care Indicators strives to advance quality in pediatric TBI with designation of quality indicators and the demonstration of meaningful variations of adherence in a subset of indicators across rehabilitation units. The work offers a foundation to study quality in this population, and from such a platform, design and implement worthwhile quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Still, among all these data, something fundamental seems to be missing: rehabilitation is a team endeavor and interdisciplinary team care is a defining characteristic of the field and how we do our work.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rivara F.P.
        • Ennis S.K.
        • Mangione-Smith R.
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Jaffe K.M.
        • National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality Care Indicators
        Quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 381-385
        • Zumsteg J.M.
        • Ennis S.K.
        • Jaffe K.M.
        • et al.
        Quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 386-393
        • Whyte J.
        Invited commentary on quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury, and quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 394-395
        • Mohr J.J.
        • Batalden P.B.
        Improving safety on the front line: the role of clinical microsystems.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11: 45-50
        • Pardini-Kiely K.
        • Greenlee E.
        • Hopkins J.
        • Szaflarski N.L.
        • Tabb K.
        Improving and sustaining core measure performance through effective accountability of clinical microsystems in an academic medical center.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010; 36: 387-398
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        Rehabilitation team process.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997; 4: 34-39
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Smits S.J.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Herrin J.S.
        • Bowen S.E.
        Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 403-409
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Stevens A.B.
        • et al.
        Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 10-15
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        Rehabilitation team process: measuring team process for quality improvement.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 1977; 4: 34-39

      Linked Article

      • Quality of Care Indicators for the Structure and Organization of Inpatient Rehabilitation Care of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 93Issue 3
        • Preview
          Zumsteg JM, Ennis SK, Jaffe KM, Mangione-Smith R, MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, and the National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality of Care Indicators. Quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      • Invited Commentary on Quality of Care Indicators for the Rehabilitation of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury, and Quality of Care Indicators for the Structure and Organization of Inpatient Rehabilitation Care of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 93Issue 3
        • Preview
          Whyte J. Invited commentary on quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury, and quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury. Measures of structure and process in health care have been shown to be associated with care outcomes in prior research. Two articles in this issue propose measures of structure and process that may be relevant to pediatric traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      • Quality of Care Indicators for the Rehabilitation of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 93Issue 3
        • Preview
          Rivara FP, Ennis SK, Mangione-Smith R, MacKenzie EJ, Jaffe KM, and the National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality Care Indicators. Quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      • The Author Responds
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 93Issue 11
        • Preview
          I appreciate the comments of Strasser and colleagues in response to the articles on pediatric rehabilitation quality indicators,1,2 and my commentary3 on them. As they note, we are in agreement on many points, but they suggest a need to focus more intensively on rehabilitation team functioning as another quality indicator. As noted in my commentary, I view structural and process measures as indicators of the types of environments and procedures that are likely to promote delivery of optimally therapeutic experiences.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
      • The Authors Respond
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 93Issue 11
        • Preview
          We thank Drs. Strasser, Falconer, and Uomoto for their letter regarding our articles,1,2 and value the conversation regarding quality of care indicators for rehabilitation care. We agree that the methods to implement care, which meet these quality standards, are all important. All medical care is delivered by teams, and the way teams function can dramatically affect the quality of care seen by patients and their families. The indicators developed by the National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality Care Indicators serve as a starting point to assess whether the team of providers for the inpatient rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injuries is following evidence-based practices.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF