Journal-based CME article| Volume 93, ISSUE 10, P1733-1750, October 2012

Development and Initial Evaluation of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index


      Jette AM, Tulsky DS, Ni P, Kisala PA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Tate DG, Whiteneck G, Charlifue S, Houlihan B, Williams S, Kirshblum S, Dyson-Hudson T, Zanca J, Fyffe D. Development and initial evaluation of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index.


      To describe the calibration of the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index (SCI-FI) and report on the initial psychometric evaluation of the SCI-FI scales in each content domain.


      Cross-sectional survey followed by calibration data simulations.


      Inpatient and community settings.


      A sample of participants (N=855) with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) recruited from 6 SCI Model Systems and stratified by diagnosis, severity, and time since injury.



      Main Outcome Measure

      SCI-FI instrument.


      Item response theory analyses confirmed the unidimensionality of 5 SCI-FI scales: basic mobility (54 items), fine motor function (36 items), self-care (90 items), ambulation (39 items), and wheelchair mobility (56 items). All SCI-FI scales revealed strong psychometric properties. High correlations of scores on simulated computer adaptive testing (CAT) with the overall SCI-FI domain scores indicated excellent potential for CAT to accurately characterize functional profiles of adults with SCI. Overall, there was very little loss of measurement reliability or precision using CAT compared with the full item bank; however, there was some loss of reliability and precision at the lower and upper ranges of each scale, corresponding to regions where there were few questions in the item banks.


      Initial evaluation revealed that the SCI-FI achieved considerable breadth of coverage in each content domain and demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. The use of CAT to administer the SCI-FI will minimize assessment burden, while allowing for the comprehensive assessment of the functional abilities of adults with SCI.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      AIS (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale), CAT (computer adaptive testing), DIF (differential item functioning), ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), IRT (item response theory), SCI (spinal cord injury), SCI-FI (Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Steeves J.D.
        • Lammertse D.
        • Curt A.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures.
        Spinal Cord. 2007; 45: 206-221
        • Anderson K.
        • Aito S.
        • Atkins M.
        • et al.
        Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2008; 31: 133-144
        • Furlan J.C.
        • Noonan V.
        • Singh A.
        • Fehlings M.G.
        Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.
        J Neurotrauma. 2011; 28: 1413-1430
        • Hall K.M.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Wright J.
        • Call M.
        • Werner P.
        Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1471-1476
        • Haley S.M.
        • Ni P.
        • Ludlow L.H.
        • Fragala-Pinkham M.A.
        Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1223-1229
        • Jette A.M.
        • Haley S.M.
        Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment.
        J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37: 339-345
        • Wise S.L.
        • Kingsbury G.G.
        Practical issues developing and maintaining a computerized adaptive testing program.
        Psicologica. 2000; 21: 135-155
        • Slavin M.D.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • Jette A.M.
        • Tulsky D.S.
        Developing a contemporary functional outcome measure for spinal cord injury research.
        Spinal Cord. 2010; 48: 262-267
        • Tulsky D.S.
        • Jette A.M.
        • Kisala P.A.
        • et al.
        Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index: item banks to measure physical functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1722-1732
        • World Health Organization
        International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2001
        • Orlando M.
        • Thissen D.
        Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models.
        Appl Psychol Measur. 2000; 24: 50-64
        • Orlando M.
        • Thissen D.
        Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models.
        Appl Psychol Meas. 2003; 27: 289-298
        • Stone C.A.
        Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models.
        J Educ Meas. 2000; 37: 58-75
        • Stone C.A.
        Empirical power and type I error rates for an IRT fit statistic that considers the precision of ability estimates.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 2003; 63: 566-586
        • Stone C.A.
        • Zhang B.
        Assessing goodness of fit of item response theory models: a comparison of traditional and alternative procedures.
        J Educ Meas. 2003; 4: 331-352
        • Crane P.
        • Gibbons L.
        • Ocepek-Welikson K.
        • et al.
        A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression.
        Qual Life Res. 2007; 16: 69-84
        • Jodoin M.G.
        • Gierl M.J.
        Evaluating type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection.
        Appl Meas Educ. 2001; 14: 329-349
        • Mâsse L.C.
        • Heesch K.C.
        • Eason K.E.
        • Wilson M.
        Evaluating the properties of a stage-specific self-efficacy scale for physical activity using classical test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and item response modeling.
        Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: i33-i46
        • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center
        Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance.
        (Accessed May 21, 2012)
      1. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM instrument), Version 5.1.
        State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo1997
        • Marino R.J.
        Domains of outcomes in spinal cord injury for clinical trials to improve neurological function.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44: 113-122
        • Gresham G.E.
        • Labi M.L.
        • Dittmar S.S.
        • Hicks J.T.
        • Joyce S.Z.
        • Stehlik M.A.
        The Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF): sensitivity and reliability demonstrated in a study of thirty quadriplegic patients.
        Paraplegia. 1986; 24: 38-44
        • Mortenson W.B.
        • Miller W.C.
        • Auger C.
        Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1177-1186
        • Itzkovich M.
        • Gelernter I.
        • Biering-Sorensen F.
        • et al.
        The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: reliability and validity in a multi-center international study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29: 1926-1933
        • Dittuno P.L.
        • Ditunno Jr, J.F.
        Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II): scale revision.
        Spinal Cord. 2001; 39: 654-656
        • Mills T.
        • Holm M.B.
        • Trefler E.
        • Schmeler M.
        • Fitzgerald S.
        • Boninger M.
        Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24: 38-46
        • Messick S.
        Test validity and the ethics of assessment.
        Am Psychol. 1980; 35: 1012-1027