Advertisement
Original article| Volume 93, ISSUE 11, P2000-2007, November 2012

Effects of Submental Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Pharyngeal Pressure Generation

  • Frauke M. Heck
    Correspondence
    Correspondence to Frauke M. Heck, MS, Boxhagener Straβe 42, 10245 Berlin, Germany
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Van der Veer Institute for Parkinson's and Brain Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Department of Linguistics and Literature, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sebastian H. Doeltgen
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Van der Veer Institute for Parkinson's and Brain Research, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Neuromotor Plasticity and Development Research Group, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Maggie-Lee Huckabee
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Disorders, University of Canterbury, Van der Veer Institute for Parkinson's and Brain Research, Christchurch, New Zealand
    Search for articles by this author
Published:March 07, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.015

      Abstract

      Heck FM, Doeltgen SH, Huckabee M-L. Effects of submental neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pharyngeal pressure generation.

      Objective

      To investigate the immediate and late effects of submental event-related neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on pharyngeal pressure generation during noneffortful and effortful saliva swallows.

      Design

      Before-after trial.

      Setting

      Swallowing rehabilitation research laboratory.

      Participants

      Sex-matched (N=20) healthy research volunteers.

      Interventions

      Participants received 80Hz NMES of 4-second duration to floor of mouth muscles that was time-locked to 60 volitional saliva swallows.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Manometry measures of peak pressures and duration of pressure events in the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were derived during execution of noneffortful and effortful saliva swallows. Measures were taken at baseline, during stimulation, and at 5-, 30-, and 60-minutes poststimulation.

      Results

      Baseline pharyngeal and UES pressures did not differ between stimulated and nonstimulated swallows. At 5- and 30-minutes poststimulation, peak pressure decreased at the hypopharyngeal and at the UES sensor during noneffortful swallows. The effect lasted up to an hour only in the hypopharynx. No changes in duration of pressure events were observed.

      Conclusions

      Using this treatment paradigm, decreased peak amplitude in the hypopharynx up to an hour after treatment indicates a potential risk of decreased bolus flow associated with NMES. On the other hand, decreased UES relaxation pressure may facilitate bolus transit into the esophagus.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      CPG (central pattern generator), EREstim (event-related stimulation), ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient), LTD (long-term depression), LTP (long-term potentiation), MEP (motor evoked potential), NMES (neuromuscular electrical stimulation), RM-ANOVA (repeated-measures analysis of variance), UES (upper esophageal sphincter)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alon G.
        Principles of electrical stimulation.
        in: Nelson R.M. Hayes K.W. Currier D.P. Clinical electrotherapy. 3rd ed. Appleton & Lange, Stamford1999: 55-139
        • Rattay F.
        Electrical nerve stimulation.
        Springer, Wien1990
        • Park C.L.
        • O'Neill P.A.
        • Martin D.F.
        A pilot exploratory study of oral electric stimulation on swallow function following stroke: an innovative technique.
        Dysphagia. 1997; 12: 161-166
        • Food and Drug Administration
        VitalStim 510 (k) clearance document.
        (Accessed March 12, 2012)
        • Carnaby-Mann G.D.
        • Crary M.A.
        Examining the evidence on neuromuscular electric stimulation for swallowing: a meta-analysis.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133: 564-571
        • Clark H.
        • Lazarus C.
        • Arvedson J.
        • Schooling T.
        • Frymark T.
        Evidence-based systematic review: effects of neuromuscular electric stimulation on swallowing and neural activation.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 18: 361-375
        • Huckabee M.L.
        • Doeltgen S.H.
        Emerging modalities in dysphagia rehabilitation: neuromuscular electric stimulation.
        N Z Med J. 2007; 120: U2744
        • Steele C.M.
        • Thrasher A.T.
        • Popovic M.R.
        Electric stimulation approaches to the restoration and rehabilitation of swallowing: a review.
        Neurol Res. 2007; 29: 9-15
        • Suiter D.M.
        • Leder S.B.
        • Ruark J.L.
        Effects of neuromuscular electric stimulation on submental muscle activity.
        Dysphagia. 2006; 21: 56-60
        • Fraser C.
        • Power M.
        • Hamdy S.
        • et al.
        Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury.
        Neuron. 2002; 34: 831-840
        • Fraser C.
        • Rothwell J.C.
        • Power M.
        • Hobson A.
        • Thompson D.G.
        • Hamdy S.
        Differential changes in human pharyngoesophageal motor excitability induced by swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and anesthesia.
        Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003; 285: G137-G144
        • Power M.
        • Fraser C.
        • Hobson A.
        • et al.
        Changes in pharyngeal corticobulbar excitability and swallowing behavior after oral stimulation.
        Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004; 286: G45-G50
        • Doeltgen S.H.
        • Dalrymple-Alford J.
        • Ridding M.C.
        • Huckabee M.L.
        Differential effects of neuromuscular electric stimulation parameters on submental motor evoked potentials.
        Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24: 519-527
        • Ludlow C.L.
        • Humbert I.
        • Saxon K.
        • Poletto C.
        • Sonies B.
        • Crujido L.
        Effects of surface electric stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia.
        Dysphagia. 2007; 22: 1-10
        • Humbert I.A.
        • Poletto C.J.
        • Saxon K.G.
        • et al.
        The effect of surface electric stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing.
        J Appl Physiol. 2006; 101: 1657-1663
        • Carnaby-Mann G.D.
        • Crary M.A.
        Adjunctive neuromuscular electric stimulation for treatment-refractory dysphagia.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008; 117: 279-287
        • Grill W.M.
        Neuromuscular stimulation.
        in: Akay M. Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. Vol. 4. Wiley, New York2006: 22573-22597
        • Jean A.
        Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms.
        Physiol Rev. 2001; 81: 929
        • Miller A.J.
        The neuroscientific principles of swallowing and dysphagia.
        Singular Publishing Group, San Diego1999
        • Huckabee M.L.
        • Butler S.G.
        • Barclay M.
        • Jit S.
        Submental surface electromyographic measurement and pharyngeal pressures during normal and effortful swallowing.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 2144-2149
        • Castell J.A.
        • Dalton C.B.
        • Castell D.O.
        Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans.
        Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: G173-G178
        • Doeltgen S.H.
        • Witte U.
        • Gumbley F.
        • Huckabee M.L.
        Evaluation of manometric measures during tongue-hold swallows.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 18: 65-73
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.
        BMJ. 1995; 310: 170
        • Perneger T.V.
        What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.
        BMJ. 1998; 316: 1236
        • Nakagawa S.
        A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias.
        Behav Ecol. 2004; 15: 1044-1045
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        2nd ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale1988
        • Ridding M.C.
        • Brouwer B.
        • Miles T.S.
        • Pitcher J.B.
        • Thompson P.D.
        Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects.
        Exp Brain Res. 2000; 131: 135-143
        • Broussard D.L.
        • Altschuler S.M.
        Brainstem viscerotopic organization of afferents and efferents involved in the control of swallowing.
        Am J Med. 2000; 108: 79S-86S
        • Lang I.M.
        Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing.
        Dysphagia. 2009; 24: 333-348
        • Jean A.
        • Dallaporta M.
        Electrophysiologic characterization of the swallowing pattern generator in the brainstem.
        GI Motility. May 16, 2006; ([serial online]) (Accessed March 4, 2012)
        • Charlton C.S.
        • Ridding M.C.
        • Thompson P.D.
        • Miles T.S.
        Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistent changes in excitability of human motor cortex.
        J Neurol Sci. 2003; 208: 79-85
        • Malenka R.C.
        • Bear M.F.
        • Pritzker N.
        LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches.
        Neuron. 2004; 44: 5-21
        • Maletic-Savatic M.
        • Malinow R.
        • Svoboda K.
        Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity.
        Science. 1999; 283: 1923-1927
        • Matsunaki M.
        • Hinkura N.
        • Ellis-Davies G.C.
        • Kasai H.
        Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines.
        Nature. 2004; 429: 761-766
        • You H.J.
        • Tjølsen A.
        • Arendt-Nielsen L.
        High-frequency conditioning electric stimulation evokes supraspinal independent long-term depression but not long-term potentiation of the spinal withdrawal reflex in rats.
        Brain Res. 2006; 1090: 116-122
        • Kline D.D.
        Plasticity in glutamatergic NTS neurotransmission.
        Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2008; 164: 105-111
        • Bonham A.C.
        • Chen C.Y.
        • Sekizawa S.
        • Joad J.P.
        Plasticity in the nucleus tractus solitarius and its influence on lung and airway reflexes.
        J Appl Physiol. 2006; 101: 322-327
        • Hamdy S.
        • Rothwell J.C.
        • Aziz Q.
        • Singh K.D.
        • Thompson D.G.
        Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation.
        J Neurosci. 1998; 1: 64-68
        • Taylor J.L.
        Magnetic muscle stimulation produces fatigue without effort.
        J Appl Physiol. 2007; 103: 733-734
        • Russ D.W.
        • Vandenborne K.
        • Binder-Macleod S.A.
        Factors in fatigue during intermittent electric stimulation of human skeletal muscle.
        J Appl Physiol. 2002; 93: 469-478
        • Al-Toubi A.K.
        • Abu-Hijleh A.
        • Huckabee M.L.
        • Macrae P.
        • Doeltgen S.H.
        Effects of repeated volitional swallowing on the excitability of submental corticobulbar motor pathways.
        Dysphagia. 2010; 26: 311-317
        • Macrae P.
        • Myall D.
        • Jones R.
        • Huckabee M.L.
        Pharyngeal pressures during swallowing within and across three sessions: within-subject variance and order effects.
        Dysphagia. 2011; 26: 385-391