Advanced Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices: Implications for Upper Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation


      Resnik L, Meucci MR, Lieberman-Klinger S, Fantini C, Kelty DL, Disla R, Sasson N. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
      The number of catastrophic injuries caused by improvised explosive devices in the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars has increased public, legislative, and research attention to upper limb amputation. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has partnered with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and DEKA Integrated Solutions to optimize the function of an advanced prosthetic arm system that will enable greater independence and function. In this special communication, we examine current practices in prosthetic rehabilitation including trends in adoption and use of prosthetic devices, financial considerations, and the role of rehabilitation team members in light of our experiences with a prototype advanced upper limb prosthesis during a VA study to optimize the device. We discuss key challenges in the adoption of advanced prosthetic technology and make recommendations for service provision and use of advanced upper limb prosthetics. Rates of prosthetic rejection are high among upper limb amputees. However, these rates may be reduced with sufficient training by a highly specialized, multidisciplinary team of clinicians, and a focus on patient education and empowerment throughout the rehabilitation process. There are significant challenges emerging that are unique to implementing the use of advanced upper limb prosthetic technology, and a lack of evidence to establish clinical guidelines regarding prosthetic prescription and treatment. Finally, we make recommendations for future research to aid in the identification of best practices and development of policy decisions regarding insurance coverage of prosthetic rehabilitation.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      ACT (Amputation Care Teams), ADLs (activities of daily living), APOC (Amputation Points of Contact), ASoC (Amputation System of Care), DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), DoD (Department of Defense), FSR (force-sensitive resistor), IMU (inertial measurement unit), OT (occupational therapy), PANS (Polytrauma/Amputation Network Site), PT (physical therapy), RAC (Regional Amputation Center), VA (Department of Veterans Affairs)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • National Limb Loss Information Center
        Amputation statistics by cause. Limb loss in the United States. NLLIC fact sheet.
        (Accessed February 6, 2012)
        • Ziegler-Graham K.
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Ephraim P.L.
        • Travison T.G.
        • Brookmeyer R.
        Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 422-429
        • Biddiss E.A.
        • Chau T.T.
        Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007; 31: 236-257
        • Wright T.W.
        • Hagen A.D.
        • Wood M.B.
        Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995; 20: 619-622
        • Biddiss E.
        • Beaton D.
        • Chau T.
        Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.
        Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007; 2: 346-357
        • Atkins D.J.
        • Heard D.C.
        • Donovan W.H.
        Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 1996; 8: 2-11
        • Dakpa R.
        • Heger H.
        Prosthetic management and training of adult upper limb amputees.
        Curr Orthop. 1997; 11: 193-202
        • Reyburn T.V.
        A method of early prosthetics training for upper-extremity amputees.
        Artif Limbs. 1971; 15: 1-5
        • Bhaskaranand K.
        • Bhat A.K.
        • Acharya K.N.
        Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective).
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123: 363-366
        • MaGuire M.T.
        Empowering prosthetics: a team approach to prosthetics and limb loss.
        Rehab management. December 2008; (Accessed February 6, 2012)
        • Lake C.
        • Dodson R.
        Progressive upper limb prosthetics.
        Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006; 17: 49-72
        • Biddiss E.
        • Chau T.
        Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86: 977-987
        • Herberts P.
        • Körner L.
        • Caine K.
        • Wensby L.
        Rehabilitation of unilateral below-elbow amputees with myoelectric prostheses.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980; 12: 123-128
        • Berger E.
        The reimbursement challenge for advanced prosthetics.
        (Accessed November 29, 2010)
        • Kejlaa G.H.
        Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees.
        Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993; 17: 157-163
        • Hanley M.A.
        • Ehde D.M.
        • Jensen M.
        • Czerniecki J.
        • Smith D.G.
        • Robinson L.R.
        Chronic pain associated with upper-limb loss.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88 (quiz 752, 779): 742-751
        • Rock Gambrell C.
        Overuse syndrome and the unilateral upper limb amputee: consequences and prevention.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 2008; 20: 126-132
        • Atkins D.
        Adult upper limb prosthetic training.
        in: Bowker H.K. Michael J.W. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. 2nd ed. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont2002 (Accessed September 18, 2008)
        • Gaine W.J.
        • Smart C.
        • Bransby-Zachary M.
        Upper limb traumatic amputees.
        J Hand Surg [Br]. 1997; 22: 73-76
        • Fletchall S.
        Returning upper-extremity amputees to work.
        The O&P Edge. August 2005; (Accessed February 6, 2012)
        • Malone J.M.
        • Fleming L.L.
        • Roberson J.
        • et al.
        Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 1984; 21: 33-41
        • Dillingham T.R.
        • Pezzin L.E.
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        Incidence, acute care length of stay, and discharge to rehabilitation of traumatic amputee patients: an epidemiologic study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 279-287
        • Brenner C.D.
        • Brenner J.K.
        The use of preparatory/evaluation/training prostheses in developing evidenced-based practice in upper limb prosthetics.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 2008; 20: 70-82
        • Smurr L.M.
        • Gulick K.
        • Yancosek K.
        • Ganz O.
        Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success.
        J Hand Ther. 2008; 21 (quiz 176): 160-175
        • VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for rehabilitation of lower limb amputation
        Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense.
        (Accessed March 30, 2011)
        • Smurr L.
        Occupational therapy for the polytrauma casualty with limb loss.
        in: Lenhart M. Textbooks of military medicine Care of the combat amputee. Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, United States of America, Washington (DC)2009
        • Andersen R.
        • Davis S.
        • Scoville C.
        Rehabilitation of military amputees: from injury to independence.
        Orthopedics. 2008; 31: 1000
        • Amputee Coalition of America
        A team-based approach to amputee rehabilitation.
        Military in-Step. 2005; (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Esquenazi A.
        Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26: 831-836
        • Nelson V.S.
        • Flood K.M.
        • Bryant P.R.
        • Huang M.E.
        • Pasquina P.F.
        • Roberts T.L.
        Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: S3-S9
        • Granville R.
        • Menetrez J.
        Rehabilitation of the lower-extremity war-injured at the center for the intrepid.
        Foot Ankle Clin. 2010; 15: 187-199
        • Gambel J.
        The process of returning to duty or not after limb loss. Military in-Step. Amputee Coalition of America in Partnership with the US Army Amputee Patient Care Program.
        (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Beasley R.W.
        General considerations in managing upper limb amputations.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1981; 12: 743-749
        • Fairley M.
        Preprosthetic therapy: is it needed?.
        O&P Edge. October 2008; (Accessed February 6, 2012)
        • Department of Veterans Affairs
        VHA handbook 1173.3. Amputee clinic teams and artificial limbs.
        (Accessed March 30, 2011)
        • Gulick K.
        The occupational therapy role in rehabilitation for the person with an upper-limb amputation.
        American Occupational Therapy Association, 2007 (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Gram D.
        Amputees fight caps in coverage for prosthetics.
        USA Today. June 9, 2008; (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Blough D.K.
        • Hubbard S.
        • McFarland L.V.
        • Smith D.G.
        • Gambel J.M.
        • Reiber G.E.
        Prosthetic cost projections for servicemembers with major limb loss from Vietnam and OIF/OEF.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010; 47: 387-402
        • Pezzin L.E.
        • Dillingham T.R.
        • Mackenzie E.J.
        • Ephraim P.
        • Rossbach P.
        Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 723-729
        • Amputee Coalition of America
        Get the facts you need to help fight for parity! 2010.
        (Accessed December 10, 2010)
        • Pike A.C.
        • Nattress L.W.
        The changing role of the amputee in the rehabilitation process.
        Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1991; 2: 405-422
        • Nielsen C.C.
        • Psonak R.A.
        • Kalter T.R.
        Factors affecting the use of prosthetic services.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 1989; 1: 242-249
        • Fish D.
        The development of coverage policy for lower extremity prosthetics: the influence of the payer on prosthetic prescription.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 2006; 18: 125-129
        • Ignaszewski D.
        Prosthetic parity: state by state.
        (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Overview. Extension of therapy cap exceptions process.
        (Accessed March 4, 2011)
        • Amputee Coalition of America
        People with amputation speak out.
        (Accessed December 27, 2011)
        • Resnik L.
        • Etter K.
        • Klinger S.L.
        • Kambe C.
        Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upper-limb prosthesis.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48: 707-718
      1. Altobelli D, Coulter S, Perry C. Design considerations in upper extremity prostheses. Symposium Proceedings: MEC '11 Raising the Standard, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. University of New Brunswick, Institute of Biomedical Engineering. August 14-19, 2011, pages 255-8.