Abstract
Objective
Design
Setting
Participants
Interventions
Main Outcome Measures
Results
Conclusions
Key Words
List of Abbreviations:
BDI (Beck Depression Inventory), CDOMD (chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders), MVAS (million visual analog scale), NWR (nonwork retention), PRE (pretreatment (program admission)), POST (posttreatment (program discharge)), SSDI (Social Security Disability Insurance), SSI (Supplemental Security Income), WR (work retention), VAS (visual analog scale)Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationReferences
- Models of diagnosis and rehabilitation in musculoskeletal pain-related occupational disability.in: Schultz I. Gatchel R. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early identification, intervention, and prevention. Springer, New York2005: 43-66
- Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury.Spine. 1985; 10: 482-493
- A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury: an objective assessment procedure.JAMA. 1987; 258: 1763-1767
- Should extended disability be an exclusion criterion for tertiary rehabilitation?.Spine. 1998; 23: 2110-2117
- High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders.J Bone Joint Surg. 2006; 88: 317-325
- Work retention and nonspecific low back pain.Spine. 2006; 15: 1850-1857
- Recurrent or new injury outcomes after return to work in chronic disabling spinal disorders: tertiary prevention efficacy of functional restoration treatment.Spine. 1996; 21: 952-959
- Are gender, marital status, or parenthood risk factors for outcome of treatment for chronic disabling spinal disorders?.J Occup Rehabil. 2005; 15: 191-201
- Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls.Spine. 1998; 23: 589-606
- Impact of functional restoration after anterior cervical fusion on chronic disability in work-related neck pain.Spine J. 2002; 2: 267-273
- Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders.Spine. 2001; 26: 1378-1384
- Gender-related differences in treatment outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders.Spine J. 2003; 3: 197-203
- Effects of presenteeism in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders: stay at work is validated.J Occup Environ Med. 2009; 51: 724-731
- Failure to complete a functional restoration program for chronic musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective 1-year outcome study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1509-1515
- The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population.Spine. 1999; 24: 2162-2170
- The Million visual analog scale: its utility for predicting tertiary rehabilitation outcomes.Spine. 2003; 28: 1051-1060
- MMPI disability profile: the least known, most useful screen for psychopathology in chronic occupational spinal disorders.Spine. 2006; 31: 2973-2978
- Psychiatric comorbidity in chronic disabling occupational spinal disorders has minimal impact on functional restoration socioeconomic outcomes.Spine. 2007; 32: 1917-1925
- Early childhood abuse in chronic spinal disorder patients: A major barrier to treatment success.Spine. 1997; 22: 2408-2415
- Prescription opioid dependence is associated with poorer outcomes in disabling spinal disorders.Spine. 2008; 33: 2219-2227
- Higher opioid doses predict poorer functional outcome in patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders.J Bone Joint Surg. 2009; 91: 919-927
- Clinical essentials of pain management.American Psychological Association, Washington, DC2004
- The lack of association between changes in functional outcomes and work retention in a chronic disabling occupational spinal disorder population: implications for the minimum clinical important difference.Spine. 2011; 36: 474-480
- Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?.Spine. 2010; 10: 321-327
- Testing minimal clinically important difference: additional comments and scientific reality testing.Spine. 2010; 4: 330-332
- The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care.Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 632-641
- Functional restoration for spinal disorders: the sports medicine approach.Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia1988
- Spine rehabilitation: secondary and tertiary nonoperative care.Spine. 2003; 3: 28S-36S
- An inventory for measuring depression.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4: 561-571
- Psychosocioeconomic predictors of treatment success/failure in chronic low back pain patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14: 427-430
- Physical progress and residual impairment after functional restoration, part iii: isokinetic and isoinertial lifting capacity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 18: 401-405
- Chronic widespread pain in patients with occupational spinal disorders: prevalence, psychiatric comorbidity, and association with outcomes.Spine. 2008; 33: 1889-1897
- Unremitting health-care-utilization outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation of chronic musculoskeletal disorders.J Bone Joint Surg. 2004; 86: 62-69
- Outcomes comparison of treatment for chronic disabling work-related upper extremity disorders and spinal disorders.J Occup Environ Med. 1999; 41: 761-770
- G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
- Psychological evaluation of the spine patient.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16: 107-112
- Using multivariate statistics.in: 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc, Boston2007
- Job loss and employment patterns of older workers.J Lab Econ. 2001; 19: 484-521
- Work and retirement among older americans.in: Clark R.L. Mitchell O.S. Reinventing the reitrement paradigm. Oxford University Pr, New York2005: 70-91
- Annual Statistical Report on the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2008.(SSA Publication No. 13-11826) Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2009
Article info
Footnotes
Supported in part the National Institutes of Health (grant nos. K05 MH01107, 2R01 MH46402, and 2R01 DE10713).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.