Advertisement

Quality of Care Indicators for the Structure and Organization of Inpatient Rehabilitation Care of Children With Traumatic Brain Injury

Published:January 27, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.018

      Abstract

      Zumsteg JM, Ennis SK, Jaffe KM, Mangione-Smith R, MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, and the National Expert Panel for the Development of Pediatric Rehabilitation Quality of Care Indicators. Quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.

      Objectives

      To develop evidence-based and expert-driven quality indicators for measuring variations in the structure and organization of acute inpatient rehabilitation for children after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to survey centers across the United States to determine the degree of variation in care.

      Design

      Quality indicators were developed using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi method. Adherence to these indicators was determined from a survey of rehabilitation facilities.

      Setting

      Inpatient rehabilitation units in the United States.

      Participants

      A sample of rehabilitation programs identified using data from the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities yielded 74 inpatient units treating children with TBI. Survey respondents comprised 31 pediatric and 28 all age units.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Variations in structure and organization of care among institutions providing acute inpatient rehabilitation for children with TBI.

      Results

      Twelve indicators were developed. Pediatric inpatient rehabilitation units and units with higher volumes of children with TBI were more likely to have: a census of at least 1 child admitted with a TBI for at least 90% of the time; adequate specialized equipment; a classroom; a pediatric subspecialty trained medical director; and more than 75% of therapists with pediatric training.

      Conclusions

      There were clinically and statistically significant variations in the structure and organization of acute pediatric rehabilitation based on the pediatric focus of the unit and volume of children with TBI.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      CARF (Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities), CI (confidence interval), CRRN (certified rehabilitation registered nurse), RAM (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method), RR (relative risk), TBI (traumatic brain injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Faul M.
        • Xu L.
        • Wald M.M.
        • Coronado V.G.
        Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta2010
        • Jaffe K.M.
        Pediatric trauma rehabilitation: a value-added safety net.
        J Trauma. 2008; 64: 819-823
        • Whyte J.
        Directions in brain injury research: from concept to clinical implementation.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009; 19: 807-823
        • Dijkers M.
        • Harrison-Felix C.
        • Harwitz J.
        The traumatic brain injury model systems: history and contributions to clinical service and research.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010; 25: 81-91
        • Donabedian A.
        Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment.
        Health Administration Pr, Ann Arbor1980
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Velozo C.A.
        State-of-the-science on post-acute rehabilitation: measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 1482-1487
        • Carney N.
        • du Coudray H.
        • Davis-O'Reilly C.
        • et al.
        Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents.
        Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999; : 1-5
        • Clohan D.B.
        • Durkin E.M.
        • Hammel J.
        • et al.
        Postacute rehabilitation research and policy recommendations.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 1535-1541
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Jurkovich G.J.
        • et al.
        The impact of trauma-center care on functional outcomes following major lower-limb trauma.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 101-109
        • MacKenzie E.J.
        • Rivara F.P.
        • Jurkovich G.J.
        • et al.
        A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 366-378
        • Reuben D.B.
        Organizational interventions to improve health outcomes of older persons.
        Med Care. 2002; 40: 416-428
        • Committee for the Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF)
        Medical rehabilitation standards manual.
        CARF Document Production, Tucson2009
        • New Zealand Guidelines Group
        Traumatic brain injury: diagnosis, acute management and rehabilitation.
        Accident Compensation Corporation, Wellington2006
        • The ERABI Research Group
        Evidence-based review of moderate to severe acquired brain injury.
        (5th web ed.) (Accessed: November 30, 2009)
      1. Turner-Stokes L. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: national clinical guidelines. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine, London2003
      2. Emergency medical services and trauma systems. Chapter 246-976 WAC; March 22, 2011.

        • Philips B.
        • Ball C.
        • Sackett D.
        • et al.
        • Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine
        Levels of Evidence.
        (Accessed March 2009)
        • Brook R.
        The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.
        in: McCormick K.A. Moore S.R. Siegel R.A. Methodological perspectives. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville1994
        • Fitch K.
        • Bernstein S.J.
        • Aguilar M.S.
        • et al.
        The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method user's manual.
        RAND, Santa Monica2006
        • Brook R.H.
        • Chassin M.R.
        • Fink A.
        • Solomon D.
        • Kosecoff J.
        • Park R.E.
        A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986; 2: 53-63
        • Shekelle P.G.
        • Chassin M.R.
        • Park R.E.
        Assessing the predictive ability of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998; 14: 707-727
        • Kravitz R.L.
        • Park R.E.
        • Kahan J.P.
        Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery.
        Health Policy. 1997; 42: 135-143
        • Hemingway H.
        • Crook A.M.
        • Feder G.
        • et al.
        Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 645-654
        • French K.
        Methodological considerations in hospital patient opinion surveys.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 1981; 18: 7-32
        • Sitzia J.
        • Wood N.
        Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 1998; 10: 311-317
        • Donabedian A.
        The quality of care: how can it be assessed?.
        JAMA. 1988; 260: 1743-1748
        • Hoenig H.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Horner R.D.
        • et al.
        Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
        Med Care. 2002; 40: 1036-1047
        • Petrosyan M.
        • Guner Y.S.
        • Emami C.N.
        • Ford H.R.
        Disparities in the delivery of pediatric trauma care.
        J Trauma. 2009; 67: S114-S119
        • Potoka D.A.
        • Schall L.C.
        • Ford H.R.
        Improved functional outcome for severely injured children treated at pediatric trauma centers.
        J Trauma. 2001; 51 (discussion 32-4): 824-832
        • Orr R.A.
        • Felmet K.A.
        • Han Y.
        • et al.
        Pediatric specialized transport teams are associated with improved outcomes.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 40-48
        • Odetola F.O.
        • Mann N.C.
        • Hansen K.W.
        • Patrick S.
        • Bratton S.L.
        Source of admission and outcomes for critically injured children in the mountain states.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164: 277-282
        • Cortes C.
        Pediatric rehabilitation nursing: education and certification.
        J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2008; 1: 51-56
        • Kane R.L.
        • Shamliyan T.A.
        • Mueller C.
        • Duval S.
        • Wilt T.J.
        The association of registered nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: 1195-1204
        • Aiken L.H.
        • Clarke S.P.
        • Sloane D.M.
        • Sochalski J.
        • Silber J.H.
        Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 1987-1993
        • Aiken L.H.
        • Sloane D.M.
        • Cimiotti J.P.
        • et al.
        Implications of the California nurse staffing mandate for other states.
        Health Serv Res. 2010; 45: 904-921
        • Jha A.K.
        • Orav E.J.
        • Zheng J.
        • Epstein A.M.
        Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1921-1931
        • Hoenig H.
        • Sloane R.
        • Horner R.D.
        • Zolkewitz M.
        • Reker D.
        Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals.
        Health Serv Res. 2001; 35: 1293-1318
        • Nathens A.B.
        • Jurkovich G.J.
        • Maier R.V.
        • et al.
        Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 1164-1171
        • Birkmeyer J.D.
        • Siewers A.E.
        • Finlayson E.V.
        • et al.
        Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1128-1137
        • Halm E.A.
        • Lee C.
        • Chassin M.R.
        Is volume related to outcome in health care?.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 511-520

      Linked Article