Special communication| Volume 91, ISSUE 11, P1641-1649, November 2010

Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury: Recommendations From the Interagency Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment


      Maas AI, Harrison-Felix CL, Menon D, Adelson PD, Balkin T, Bullock R, Engel DC, Gordon W, Langlois Orman J, Lew HL, Robertson C, Temkin N, Valadka A, Verfaellie M, Wainwright M, Wright DW, Schwab K. Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the Interagency Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment.
      Comparing results across studies in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been difficult because of the variability in data coding, definitions, and collection procedures. The global aim of the Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment was to develop recommendations on the coding of clinical and demographic variables for TBI studies applicable across the broad spectrum of TBI, and to classify these as core, supplemental, or emerging. The process was consensus driven, with input from experts over a broad range of disciplines. Special consideration was given to military and pediatric TBI. Categorizing clinical elements as core versus supplemental proved difficult, given the great variation in types of studies and their interests. The data elements are contained in modules, which are grouped together in categories. Three levels of detail for coding data elements were developed: basic, intermediate, and advanced, with the greatest level of detail in the advanced version. In every case, the more detailed coding can be collapsed into the basic version. Templates were produced to summarize coding formats, motivation of choices, and recommendations for procedures. Work is ongoing to include more international participation and to provide an electronic data entry format with pull-down menus and automated data checks. This proposed standardization will facilitate comparison of research findings across studies and encourage high-quality meta-analysis of individual patient data.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale), CDE (common data element), GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale), ICP (intracranial pressure), IMPACT (International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in TBI), ISS (Injury Severity Score), LOC (loss of consciousness), OMB (Office of Management and Budget), PTA (posttraumatic amnesia), TBI (traumatic brain injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Maas A.I.
        • Marmarou A.
        • Murray G.D.
        • Teasdale S.G.
        • Steyerberg E.W.
        Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study.
        J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24: 232-238
        • Marmarou A.
        • Lu J.
        • Butcher I.
        • et al.
        IMPACT database of traumatic brain injury: design and description.
        J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24: 239-250
        • Thurmond V.A.
        • Hicks R.A.
        • Gleason T.
        • et al.
        Advancing integrated research in psychological health and traumatic brain injury: common data elements.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1633-1636
        • Menon D.K.
        • Schwab K.
        • Wright D.W.
        • Maas A.I.
        Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1637-1640
        • Maas A.
        Standardisation of data collection in traumatic brain injury: key to the future?.
        Crit Care. 2009; 13: 1016
        • Bullock R.M.
        • Chesnut R.M.
        • Clifton G.L.
        • et al.
        Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury.
        J Neurotrauma. 2000; 17: 451-627
        • Mushkudiani N.A.
        • Engel D.C.
        • Steyerberg E.W.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of demographic characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.
        J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24: 259-269
        • Bhopal R.
        • Donaldson L.
        White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what?.
        Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 1303-1307
        • Haga S.B.
        • Venter J.C.
        FDA faces in wrong direction.
        Science. 2003; 301: 466
        • Smart A.
        • Tutton R.
        • Martin P.
        • Ellison G.T.
        • Ashcroft R.
        The standardization of race and ethnicity in biomedical science editorials and UK biobanks.
        Soc Stud Sci. 2008; 38: 407-423
        • Ma I.W.
        • Khan N.A.
        • Kang A.
        • Zalunardo N.
        • Palepu A.
        Systematic review identified suboptimal reporting and use of race/ethnicity in general medical journals.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60: 572-578
        • Wright L.
        The New Yorker.
        in: 1994 Jul 15: 46-55
        • Jorde L.B.
        • Wooding S.P.
        Genetic variation, classification and “race.”.
        Nat Genet. 2004; 36: S28-S33
        • Caulfield T.
        • Fullerton S.M.
        • Ali-Khan S.E.
        • et al.
        Race and ancestry in biomedical research: exploring the challenges.
        Genome Med. 2009; 1: 8
        • Tutton R.
        • Smart A.
        • Martin P.A.
        • Ashcroft R.
        • Ellison G.T.
        Genotyping the future: scientists' expectations about race/ethnicity after BiDil.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2008; 36: 464-470
        • Wynia M.K.
        • Ivey S.L.
        • Hasnain-Wynia R.
        Collection of data on patients' race and ethnic group by physician practices.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 846-850
        • Suarez-Kurtz G.
        Pharmacogenomics in admixed populations.
        Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005; 26: 196-201
        • Wolf S.J.
        • Bebarta V.S.
        • Bonnett C.J.
        • Pons P.T.
        • Cantrill S.V.
        Blast injuries.
        Lancet. 2009; 374: 405-415
        • Ling G.
        • Bandak F.
        • Armonda R.
        • Grant G.
        • Ecklund J.
        Explosive blast neurotrauma.
        J Neurotrauma. 2009; 26: 815-825
        • Medicine AftAoA
        The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision.
        in: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Des Plaines1990: 15-24
        • Baker S.P.
        • O'Neill B.
        • Haddon W.
        • Long W.B.
        The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.
        J Trauma. 1974; 14: 187-196
        • Perel P.
        • Arango M.
        • et al.
        • MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators
        Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 425-429
        • Steyerberg E.W.
        • Mushkudiani N.
        • Perel P.
        • et al.
        Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.
        PLoS Med. 2008; 8: e165
        • Chesnut R.M.
        • Marshall L.F.
        • Klauber M.R.
        • et al.
        The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury.
        J Trauma. 1993; 34: 216-222
        • McHugh G.S.
        • Engel D.C.
        • Butcher I.
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.
        J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24: 287-293
        • Signorini D.F.
        • Andrews P.J.
        • Jones P.A.
        • Wardlaw J.M.
        • Miller J.D.
        Adding insult to injury: the prognostic value of early secondary insults for survival after traumatic brain injury.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999; 66: 26-31
      1. Wilde EA, Whiteneck GG, Bogner J, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1650-60.

        • AFHSC. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center
        Traumatic brain injury among members of active components, U.S. Armed Forces, 1997-2006.
        Med Surveillance Mon Rep. 2007; 14: 2-6
        • Hoge C.W.
        • McGurk D.
        • Thomas J.L.
        • Cox A.L.
        • Engel C.C.
        • Castro C.A.
        Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 453-463
        • Vasterling J.J.
        • Proctor S.P.
        • Amoroso P.
        • Kane R.
        • Heeren T.
        • White R.F.
        Neuropsychological outcomes of army personnel following deployment to the Iraq war.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 519-529
        • Schell T.L.
        • Marshall G.N.
        Survey of individuals previously deployed for OEF/OIF.
        in: Tanidian T. Jaycox L.H. Invisible wounds of war: psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Rand Corp, Santa Monica2008: 87-115
        • Shore P.M.
        • Hand L.L.
        • Roy L.
        • Trivedi P.
        • Kochanek P.M.
        • Adelson P.D.
        Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Intensity Level of Therapy (PILOT) scale: a measure of the use of intracranial pressure-directed therapies.
        Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: 1981-1987
        • Chambers I.R.
        • Stobbart L.
        • Jones P.A.
        • et al.
        Age-related differences in intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the first 6 hours of monitoring after children's head injury: association with outcome.
        Childs Nerv Syst. 2005; 21: 195-199