Advertisement
Special communication| Volume 91, ISSUE 11, P1673-1683, November 2010

Download started.

Ok

Consensus Recommendations for Common Data Elements for Operational Stress Research and Surveillance: Report of a Federal Interagency Working Group

      Abstract

      Nash WP, Vasterling J, Ewing-Cobbs L, Horn S, Gaskin T, Golden J, Riley WT, Bowles SV, Favret J, Lester P, Koffman R, Farnsworth LC, Baker DG. Consensus recommendations for common data elements for operational stress research and surveillance: report of a federal interagency working group.
      Empirical studies and surveillance projects increasingly assess and address potentially adverse psychological health outcomes from the stress of military operations, but no standards yet exist for common concept definitions, variable categories, and measures. This article reports the consensus recommendations of the federal interagency Operational Stress Working Group for common data elements to be used in future operational stress research and surveillance with the goal of improving comparability across studies. Operational stress encompasses more than just combat; it occurs everywhere service members and their families live and work. Posttraumatic stress is not the only adverse mental or behavioral health outcome of importance. The Operational Stress Working Group contends that a primary goal of operational stress research and surveillance is to promote prevention of adverse mental and behavioral outcomes, especially by recognizing the preclinical and subclinical states of distress and dysfunction that portend a risk for failure of role performance or future mental disorders. Recommendations for data elements are divided into 3 tiers: core, supplemental, and emerging, including variable domains and specific measures for assessing operational stressor exposures, stress outcomes, moderating factors, and mediating processes. Attention is drawn to the emerging construct of stress injury as a generic term for subclinical operational stress, and to emerging data elements addressing biological, psychological, and spiritual mediators of risk. Methodologies are needed for identifying preclinical and subclinical states of distress or dysfunction that are markers of risk for failure of role performance and future clinical mental disorders, so that targeted prevention interventions can be developed and evaluated.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      DRRI (Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory), IOM (Institute of Medicine), OEF (Operation Enduring Freedom), OIF (Operation Iraqi Freedom), OSWG (Operational Stress Working Group), PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thurmond V.A.
        • Hicks R.
        • Gleason T.
        • et al.
        Advancing integrated research in psychological health and traumatic brain injury: common data elements.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1633-1636
        • Nash W.P.
        Combat/operational stress adaptations and injuries.
        in: Figley C.F. Nash W.P. Combat stress injury: theory, research, and management. Routledge, New York2007: 33-64
        • Litz B.T.
        • Stein N.
        • Delaney E.
        • et al.
        Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: a preliminary model and intervention strategy.
        Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29: 695-706
        • Booth-Kewley S.
        • Larson G.E.
        • Highfill-McRoy R.M.
        • Garland C.F.
        • Gaskin T.A.
        Correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in Marines back from war.
        J Trauma Stress. 2010; 23: 69-77
        • La Bash H.A.
        • Vogt D.S.
        • King L.A.
        • King D.W.
        Deployment stressors of the Iraq War: insights from the mainstream media.
        J Interpers Violence. 2009; 24: 231-258
        • Nash W.P.
        The stressors of war.
        in: Figley C.F. Nash W.P. Combat stress injury: theory, research, and management. Routledge, New York2007: 33-64
        • Baker D.G.
        • Heppner P.
        • Niloofar A.
        • et al.
        Trauma exposure, branch of service, and physical injury in relation to mental health among U.S. veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.
        Mil Med. 2009; 174: 773-777
        • MacGregor A.J.
        • Corson K.S.
        • Larson G.E.
        • et al.
        Injury-specific predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder.
        Injury. 2009; 40: 1004-1010
        • Lester P.
        • Peterson K.
        • Reeves J.
        • Knauss L.
        • Glover D.
        • et al.
        The long war and parental combat deployment: effects on military children and at-home spouses.
        Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49: 310-320
        • Kaloupek D.G.
        • Chard K.M.
        • Freed M.C.
        • et al.
        Common data elements for posttraumatic stress disorder research.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1684-1691
        • Hoge C.W.
        • Auchterlonie J.L.
        • Milliken C.S.
        Mental health problems, use of mental health services and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan.
        JAMA. 2006; 295: 1023-1032
        • Wojcik B.E.
        • Akhtar F.Z.
        • Hassel L.H.
        Hospital admissions related to mental disorders in U.S. Army soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
        Mil Med. 2009; 174: 1010-1018
        • Wells T.S.
        • LeardMann C.A.
        • Fortuna S.O.
        • et al.
        A prospective study of depression following combat deployment in support of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
        Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 90-99
        • Mental Health Advisory Team
        Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT) VI: Operation Iraqi Freedom 07-09, 8 May 2009.
        (Accessed February 9, 2010)
        • Mental Health Advisory Team
        Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT) 6: Operation Enduring Freedom 2009 Afghanistan, 6 November 2009.
        (Accessed February 9, 2010)
        • Granado N.S.
        • Smith T.C.
        • Swanson G.M.
        • et al.
        Newly reported hypertension after military combat deployment in a large population-based study.
        Hypertension. 2009; 54: 966-973
        • Boscarino J.A.
        A prospective study of PTSD and early-age heart disease mortality among Vietnam veterans: implications for surveillance and prevention.
        Psychosom Med. 2008; 70: 668-676
        • Benedek D.M.
        • Grieger T.A.
        Post-deployment violence and antisocial behavior: the influence of pre-deployment factors, warzone experience, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
        Prim Psychiatry. 2006; 13: 51-56
        • Pietrzak R.H.
        • Goldstein M.B.
        • Malley J.C.
        • Rivers A.J.
        • Johnson D.C.
        • Southwick S.M.
        Risk and protective factors associated with suicidal ideation in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.
        J Affect Disord. 2010; 123: 102-107
        • Sareen J.
        • Cox B.J.
        • Afifi T.O.
        • et al.
        Combat and peacekeeping operations in relation to prevalence of mental disorders and perceived need for mental health care.
        Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007; 64: 843-852
        • Taylor M.K.
        • Mujica-Parodi L.R.
        • Potterat E.G.
        • et al.
        Anger expression and stress responses in military men.
        Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009; 80: 962-967
        • Prigerson H.G.
        • Jacobs S.C.
        Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: a rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test.
        in: Stroebe M.S. Hansson R.O. Stroebe W. Schut H.A.W. Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping and care. American Psychological Association, Washington (DC2001: 613-647
        • Tedeschi R.G.
        • Calhoun L.G.
        Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.
        Psychol Inq. 2004; 15: 1-18
        • Southwick S.M.
        • Vythilingam M.
        • Charney D.S.
        The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: implications for prevention and treatment.
        Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005; 1: 255-291
        • American Psychiatric Association
        Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision.
        in: American Psychiatric Association, Washington (DC)2000: 463-468
        • Defense Health Board Task Force on Mental Health
        An achievable vision: report of the Department of Defense Task Force on Mental Health.
        Defense Health Board, Falls Church2007
        • Mrazek P.J.
        • Haggerty R.J.
        Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for prevention intervention science.
        National Academies Pr, Washington (DC)1994
        • Feldner M.T.
        • Monson C.M.
        • Friedman M.J.
        A critical analysis of approaches to targeted PTSD prevention: current status and theoretically derived future directions.
        Behav Modif. 2007; 31: 80-115
        • Herman J.
        Trauma and recovery: the aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror.
        in: Basic Books, New York1992: 51-73
        • Shay J.
        Achilles in Vietnam: combat trauma and the undoing of character.
        in: Scribner, New York1994: 3-38
        • Walker M.U.
        Moral repair: reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing.
        in: Cambridge University Pr, Cambridge2006: 72-109
        • Bernstein J.M.
        Suffering injustice: misrecognition as moral injury in critical theory.
        Int J Philos Stud. 2005; 13: 303-324
        • Janoff-Bulman R.
        Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct.
        Soc Cognition. 1989; 7: 113-136
      1. Steenkamp M, Litz BT, Gray M, et al. A brief exposure-based intervention for service members with PTSD. Cogn Behav Pract. In press.

        • Prigerson H.G.
        • Horowitz M.J.
        • Jacobs S.C.
        • et al.
        Prolonged grief disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11.
        PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000121
        • Headquarters Department of the Army
        Combat and Operational Stress Control, FM 4-02.51.
        in: Department of the Army, Washington (DC)2006: 1-5 (Accessed August 30, 2009)
        • Solomon Z.
        • Shklar R.
        • Mikulincer M.
        Frontline treatment of combat stress reaction: a 20-year longitudinal study.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162: 2309-2314
      2. Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Navy Warfare Development Command. Combat and operational stress control, MCRP 6-11C/NTTP 1-15M. Quantico, VA: Marine Corps Combat Development Command. In press.

      3. Nash WP, Steenkamp M, Conoscenti L, Litz BT. The stress continuum model: a military organizational approach to resilience and recovery. In: Southwick S, Charney D, Friedman M, Litz B, editors. Resilience: responding to challenges across the lifespan. New York: Cambridge University Pr. In press.

        • Maas A.I.
        • Harrison-Felix C.L.
        • Menon D.
        • et al.
        Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the Interagency Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91: 1641-1649
        • King L.A.
        • King D.W.
        • Vogt D.S.
        • Knight J.
        • Samper R.E.
        Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory: a collection of measures for studying deployment-related experiences of military personnel and veterans.
        Mil Psychol. 2006; 18: 89-120
        • Vogt D.S.
        • Proctor S.P.
        • King D.W.
        • King L.A.
        • Vasterling J.J.
        Validation of scales from the Deployment Risk and Resilience Inventory in a sample of Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans.
        Assessment. 2008; 15: 391-403
        • Beck A.T.
        • Steer R.A.
        • Brown G.K.
        Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
        Psychological Corporation, San Antonio1996
        • Beck A.T.
        • Steer R.A.
        Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual.
        Psychological Corporation, San Antonio1993
        • Saunders J.B.
        • Aasland O.G.
        • Babor T.F.
        • dela Fuente J.R.
        • Grant M.
        Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II.
        Addiction. 1993; 8: 791-804
        • Hobfoll S.E.
        • Lilly R.S.
        Resource conservation as a strategy for community psychology.
        J Community Psychol. 1993; 21: 128-148
        • Brunet A.
        • Weiss D.S.
        • Metzler T.J.
        • et al.
        The Peritraumatic Distress Inventory: a proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2.
        Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158: 1480-1485
        • Marmar C.R.
        • Metzler T.J.
        • Otte C.
        The Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire.
        in: Wilson J.P. Keane T.M. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. 2nd ed. Guilford Pr, New York2004: 144-167
        • Nijenhuis E.R.S.
        • Spinhoven P.
        • van Dyck R.
        • van der Hart O.
        • Vanderlingen J.
        The development and psychometric characteristics of the Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire (SDQ-20).
        J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996; 184: 688-694
        • Carver C.S.
        You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the Brief COPE.
        Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4: 92-100
        • Connor K.M.
        • Davidson J.R.T.
        Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).
        Depress Anxiety. 2003; 18: 76-82
        • Bernstein E.M.
        • Putnam F.W.
        Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale.
        J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986; 174: 727-735
        • Watson D.
        • Clark L.A.
        • Tellegen A.
        Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54: 1063-1070
        • Bliese P.D.
        • Halverson R.R.
        Individual and nomothetic models of job stress: an examination of work hours, cohesion, and well-being.
        J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996; 26: 1171-1189
        • Epstein N.
        • Baldwin L.
        • Bishop D.
        The McMaster Family Assessment Device.
        J Marital Fam Ther. 1983; 9: 171-180
        • Gavin D.R.
        • Ross H.E.
        • Skinner H.A.
        Diagnostic validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders.
        Br J Addict. 1989; 84: 301-307
        • Buysse D.J.
        • Reynolds C.F.
        • Monk T.H.
        • Berman S.R.
        • Kupfer D.J.
        The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research.
        Pyschiatry Res. 1989; 28: 193-213
        • Kazis L.E.
        • Miller D.R.
        • Skinner K.M.
        • et al.
        Applications of methodologies of the Veterans Health Study in the VA Healthcare System.
        J Ambul Care Manage. 2006; 29: 182-188
        • Straus M.A.
        Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics Scales.
        J Marriage Fam. 1979; 41: 75-88
        • Tedeschi R.G.
        • Calhoun L.G.
        The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma.
        J Trauma Stress. 1996; 9: 455-471
        • U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
        Spiritual attitude inventory user guide: approach to wellness.
        USACHPPM, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD2009 (Accessed March 7, 2010)
        • Rabinowitz Y.G.
        • Breitbach J.E.
        • Warner C.H.
        Managing aviator fatigue in a deployed environment: the relationship between fatigue and neurocognitive functioning.
        Mil Med. 2009; 174: 358-362
      4. Nash WP, Goldwasser G, Lohr JB, Baker DG, Nunnink SE, Siegmann D. The Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire: a proposed observer-rated measure of combat-related stress for utilization in the war zone. Poster session: presented at the annual Veterans Affairs Mental Health Summit, Baltimore, 2009.

        • Taylor M.K.
        • Sausen K.P.
        • Mujica-Parodi L.R.
        • Potterat E.G.
        • Yanagi M.A.
        • Kim H.
        Neurophysiologic methods to measure stress during survival, evasion, resistance, and escape training.
        Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007; 78: B224-B230
        • Vasterling J.J.
        • Proctor S.P.
        • Amoroso P.
        • et al.
        Neuropsychological outcomes of Army personnel following deployment to the Iraq War.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 519-529
        • Janoff-Bulman R.
        Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct.
        Soc Cognition. 1989; 7: 113-139
        • Kubany E.S.
        • Haynes S.N.
        • Abueg F.R.
        • Manke F.P.
        • Brennan J.M.
        • Stahura C.
        Development and validation of the Trauma-Related Guilt Inventory (TRGI).
        Psychol Assess. 1996; 8: 428-444
        • Hobfoll S.E.
        Social and psychological resources and adaptation.
        Rev Gen Psychol. 2002; 6: 307-324
        • van der Hart O.
        • van Dijke A.
        • van Son M.
        Somatoform dissociation in traumatized World War I combat soldiers: a neglected clinical heritage.
        J Trauma Dissociation. 2000; 1: 33-66
        • Tutty L.M.
        Theoretical and practical issues in selecting a measure of family functioning.
        Res Social Work Pract. 1995; 5: 80-106
        • Ware J.E.
        • Sherbourne C.D.
        The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): I.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483
        • Kazis L.E.
        • Miller D.R.
        • Clark J.A.
        • et al.
        Improving the response choices on the veterans SF-36 health survey role functioning scale.
        J Ambul Care Manage. 2004; 27: 263-280