Accuracy of Diagnostic Ultrasound in Patients With Suspected Subacromial Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


      Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, van den Bruel A, Weijers RE, de Bie RA, Dinant G-J. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with suspected subacromial disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


      To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting subacromial disorders in patients presenting in primary and secondary care settings.

      Data Sources

      Medline and Embase were searched on June 9, 2010. In addition, the reference list of 1 systematic review and all included articles were searched to identify relevant studies.

      Study Selection

      Two reviewers independently selected the articles evaluating the accuracy of ultrasound for detecting subacromial disorders from the title and abstracts retrieved by the literature search. Selection criteria were ultrasound frequency greater than or equal to 7.5MHz as index test, surgery, magnetic resonance imaging and/or radiography as reference standards, and subacromial disorders as target conditions.

      Data Extraction

      Two reviewers independently extracted the data on study characteristics and results to construct 2 by 2 tables and performed a methodologic quality assessment.

      Data Synthesis

      Twenty-three studies were included: 22 reported on full-thickness rotator cuff tears, 15 on partial-thickness tears, 3 on subacromial bursitis, 2 on tendinopathy, and 2 on calcifying tendonitis, respectively. For full-thickness tears, pooled sensitivity of ultrasound was .95 (95% confidence interval, .90–.97), and specificity .96 (.93–.98). For partial-thickness tears, pooled sensitivity was .72 (.58–.83), and specificity .93 (.89–.96). Statistical pooling was not possible for the other disorders. For subacromial bursitis, sensitivity ranged from .79 to .81, and specificity from .94 to .98. For tendinopathy, sensitivity ranged from .67 to .93, specificity from .88 to 1.00. Sensitivity for calcifying tendonitis was 1.00 in both studies, with specificity ranging from .85 to .98.


      We strongly recommend ultrasound in patients for whom conservative treatment fails, to rule in or out full-thickness tears, to rule in partial-thickness tears, and to a lesser extent to diagnose tendinopathy, subacromial bursitis, and calcifying tendonitis. These results can help physicians tailor treatment.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      CI (confidence interval), HSROC (hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic), LR+ (positive likelihood ratio), LR− (negative likelihood ratio), MR (magnetic resonance), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), US (ultrasound)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Feleus A.
        • Bierma-Zeinstra S.M.
        • Miedema H.S.
        • Bernsen R.M.
        • Verhaar J.A.
        • Koes B.W.
        Incidence of non-traumatic complaints of arm, neck and shoulder in general practice.
        Man Ther. 2008; 13: 426-433
        • Picavet H.S.
        • Schouten J.S.
        Musculoskeletal pain in The Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study.
        Pain. 2003; 102: 167-178
        • Bot S.D.
        • van der Waal J.M.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • et al.
        Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64: 118-123
      1. Lewis J. Tennent D. How effective are diagnostic tests for the assessment of rotator cuff disease of the shoulder? Blackwell, BMJ Books, London2007
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Levine W.N.
        Subacromial impingement syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 1854-1868
        • Neer 2nd, C.S.
        Impingement lesions.
        Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983; 173: 70-77
      2. Fischer A.F. Dexter W.W. How evidence-based is our examination of the shoulder? Blackwell, BMJ Books, London2007
        • Hughes P.C.
        • Taylor N.F.
        • Green R.A.
        Most clinical tests cannot accurately diagnose rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review.
        Aust J Physiother. 2008; 54: 159-170
        • Bamji A.N.
        • Erhardt C.C.
        • Price T.R.
        • Williams P.L.
        The painful shoulder: can consultants agree?.
        Br J Rheumatol. 1996; 35: 1172-1174
        • de Winter A.F.
        • Jans M.P.
        • Scholten R.J.
        • Deville W.
        • van Schaardenburg D.
        • Bouter L.M.
        Diagnostic classification of shoulder disorders: interobserver agreement and determinants of disagreement.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1999; 58: 272-277
        • Liesdek C.
        • van der Windt D.A.W.M.
        • Koes B.W.
        • Bouter L.M.
        Soft-tissue disorders of the shoulder: a study of inter-observer agreement between general practitioners and physiotherapists and an overview of physiotherapeutic treatment.
        Physiotherapy. 1997; 83: 12-17
        • Baring T.
        • Emery R.J.H.
        • Reilly P.
        Management of rotator cuff disease: specific treatment for specific disorders.
        Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007; 21: 279-294
        • Kuhn J.E.
        Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 138-160
        • Millett P.J.
        • Wilcox 3rd, R.B.
        • O'Holleran J.D.
        • Warner J.J.
        Rehabilitation of the rotator cuff: an evaluation-based approach.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14: 599-609
        • Lahteenmaki H.E.
        • Hiltunen A.
        • Virolainen P.
        • Nelimarkka O.
        Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears is recommended regardless of tear size and age: a retrospective study of 218 patients.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 586-590
        • Allen G.M.
        • Wilson D.J.
        Ultrasound of the shoulder.
        Eur J Ultrasound. 2001; 14: 3-9
        • Dinnes J.
        • Loveman E.
        • McIntyre L.
        • Waugh N.
        The effectiveness of diagnostic tests for the assessment of shoulder pain due to soft tissue disorders: a systematic review.
        Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7 (iii): 1-166
        • Jacobson J.A.
        • van Holsbeeck M.T.
        Musculoskeletal ultrasonography.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29: 135-167
        • Middleton W.
        • Teefey S.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 1465-1468
        • Martinoli C.
        • Bianchi S.
        • Prato N.
        • et al.
        US of the shoulder: non-rotator cuff disorders.
        Radiographics. 2003; 23 (quiz 534): 381-401
        • de Jesus J.O.
        • Parker L.
        • Frangos A.J.
        • Nazarian L.N.
        Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 1701-1707
      3. Handbook for DTA reviews.
        • Whiting P.
        • Rutjes A.W.
        • Dinnes J.
        • Reitsma J.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Kleijnen J.
        Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8 (iii): 1-234
        • Harbord R.M.
        • Whiting P.
        • Sterne J.A.
        • et al.
        An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 1095-1103
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Glas A.S.
        • Rutjes A.W.
        • Scholten R.J.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Zwinderman A.H.
        Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 982-990
        • Al-Shawi A.
        • Badge R.
        • Bunker T.
        The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 889-892
        • Chang C.Y.
        • Wang S.F.
        • Chiou H.J.
        • Ma H.L.
        • Sun Y.C.
        • Wu H.D.
        Comparison of shoulder ultrasound and MR imaging in diagnosing full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        Clin Imaging. 2002; 26: 50-54
        • Cullen D.M.
        • Breidahl W.H.
        • Janes G.C.
        Diagnostic accuracy of shoulder ultrasound performed by a single operator.
        Australas Radiol. 2007; 51: 226-229
        • Farin P.U.
        • Jaroma H.
        • Harju A.
        • Soimakallio S.
        Shoulder impingement syndrome: sonographic evaluation.
        Radiology. 1990; 176: 845-849
        • Frei R.
        • Chladek P.
        • Trc T.
        • Kopecny Z.
        • Kautzner J.
        Arthroscopic evaluation of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear.
        Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2008; 10: 111-114
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Ciccone J.
        • Buss D.D.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 1305-1311
        • Kayser R.
        • Hampf S.
        • Pankow M.
        • Seeber E.
        • Heyde C.E.
        Validity of ultrasound examinations of disorders of the shoulder joint.
        Ultraschall Med. 2005; 26: 291-298
        • Martin-Hervas C.
        • Romero J.
        • Navas-Acien A.
        • Reboiras J.J.
        • Munuera L.
        Ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images of rotator cuff lesions compared with arthroscopy or open surgery findings.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 410-415
        • Milosavljevic J.
        • Elvin A.
        • Rahme H.
        Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison with arthroscopy in one-hundred-and-ninety consecutive cases.
        Acta Radiol. 2005; 46: 858-865
        • Moosmayer S.
        • Heir S.
        • Smith H.J.
        Sonography of the rotator cuff in painful shoulders performed without knowledge of clinical information: results from 58 sonographic examinations with surgical correlation.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 2007; 35: 20-26
        • Naredo A.E.
        • Aguado P.
        • Padron M.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with painful shoulder.
        J Clin Rheumatol. 1999; 5: 184-192
        • Paavolainen P.
        • Ahovuo J.
        Ultrasonography and arthrography in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 335-340
        • Read J.W.
        • Perko M.
        Shoulder ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy for impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tendon pathology.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7: 264-271
        • Roberts C.S.
        • Walker 2nd, J.A.
        • Seligson D.
        Diagnostic capabilities of shoulder ultrasonography in the detection of complete and partial rotator cuff tears.
        Am J Orthop. 2001; 30: 159-162
        • Rutten M.J.
        • Spaargaren G.J.
        • van Loon T.
        • de Waal Malefijt M.C.
        • Kiemeney L.A.
        • Jager G.J.
        Detection of rotator cuff tears: the value of MRI following ultrasound.
        Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 450-457
        • Sonnabend D.H.
        • Hughes J.S.
        • Giuffre B.M.
        • Farrell R.
        The clinical role of shoulder ultrasound.
        Aust N Z J Surg. 1997; 67: 630-633
        • Swen W.A.
        • Jacobs J.W.
        • Algra P.R.
        • et al.
        Sonography and magnetic resonance imaging equivalent for the assessment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1999; 42: 2231-2238
        • Swen W.A.
        • Jacobs J.W.
        • Neve W.C.
        • Bal D.
        • Bijlsma J.W.
        Is sonography performed by the rheumatologist as useful as arthrography executed by the radiologist for the assessment of full thickness rotator cuff tears?.
        J Rheumatol. 1998; 25: 1800-1806
        • Takagishi K.
        • Makino K.
        • Takahira N.
        • Ikeda T.
        • Tsuruno K.
        • Itoman M.
        Ultrasonography for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear.
        Skeletal Radiol. 1996; 25: 221-224
        • Teefey S.A.
        • Hasan S.A.
        • Middleton W.D.
        • Patel M.
        • Wright R.W.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 498-504
        • Teefey S.A.
        • Rubin D.A.
        • Middleton W.D.
        • Hildebolt C.F.
        • Leibold R.A.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears: comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases.
        J Bone Joint Surgery Am. 2004; 86-A: 708-716
        • van Holsbeeck M.T.
        • Kolowich P.A.
        • Eyler W.R.
        • et al.
        US depiction of partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff.
        Radiology. 1995; 197: 443-446
        • Wiener S.N.
        • Seitz Jr, W.H.
        Sonography of the shoulder in patients with tears of the rotator cuff: accuracy and value for selecting surgical options.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160 (discussion 9-10): 103-107
        • Altman D.G.
        • Bland J.M.
        Diagnostic tests.
        BMJ. 1994; 308: 1552
        • Deeks J.J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios.
        BMJ. 2004; 329: 168-169
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Barth J.R.
        • Richards D.P.
        • Zlatkin M.B.
        • Larsen M.
        Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 347-354
        • Matava M.J.
        • Purcell D.B.
        • Rudzki J.R.
        Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1405-1417
        • Milgrom C.
        • Schaffler M.
        • Gilbert S.
        • van Holsbeeck M.
        Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults: the effect of age, hand dominance and gender.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77: 296-298
        • Reilly P.
        • Macleod I.
        • Macfarlane R.
        • Windley J.
        • Emery R.J.H.
        Dead men and radiologists don't lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88: 116-121
        • Sher J.S.
        • Uribe J.W.
        • Posada A.
        • Murphy B.J.
        • Zlatkin M.B.
        Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77: 10-15
        • Khan K.M.
        • Cook J.L.
        • Bonar F.
        • Harcourt P.
        • Astrom M.
        Histopathology of common tendinopathies: update and implications for clinical management.
        Sports Med. 1999; 27: 393-408
        • Puddu G.
        • Ippolito E.
        • Postacchini F.
        A classification of Achilles tendon disease.
        Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4: 145-150
        • Perugia L.
        • Ippolitio E.
        • Postacchini F.
        A new approach to the pathology, clinical features and treatment of stress tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon.
        Ital J Orthop Traumatol. 1976; 2: 5-21
        • Rutjes A.W.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Di Nisio M.
        • Smidt N.
        • van Rijn J.C.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
        CMAJ. 2006; 174: 469-476
        • Leeflang M.
        • Reitsma J.
        • Scholten R.
        • et al.
        Impact of adjustment for quality on results of metaanalyses of diagnostic accuracy.
        Clin Chem. 2007; 53: 164-172
        • Whiting P.
        • Harbord R.
        • Kleijnen J.
        No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 19
        • Whiting P.F.
        • Sterne J.A.
        • Westwood M.E.
        • et al.
        Graphical presentation of diagnostic information.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008; 8: 20

      Linked Article

      • Correction
        Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 91Issue 12
        • Preview
          In Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, van den Bruel A, Weijers RE, de Bie RA, Dinant G-J. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with suspected subacromial disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1616-25, errors occurred in 2 headings in Table 3. In the column heading ‘Differential Verification' a word is missing. The heading should read ‘Differential Verification Avoided.' In addition, in the column heading ‘Reference Standard Results,' the word ‘Blinded' was missing.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF