Comparison of Trunk Proprioception Between Patients With Low Back Pain and Healthy Controls


      Lee AS, Cholewicki J, Reeves NP, Zazulak BT, Mysliwiec LW. Comparison of trunk proprioception between patients with low back pain and healthy controls.


      To determine whether proprioceptive impairments exist in patients with low back pain (LBP). We hypothesized that patients with LBP would exhibit larger trunk proprioception errors than healthy controls.


      Case-control study.


      University laboratory.


      24 patients with nonspecific LBP and 24 age-matched healthy controls.


      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measures

      We measured trunk proprioception in all 3 anatomical planes using motion perception threshold, active repositioning, and passive repositioning tests.


      LBP patients had significantly greater motion perception threshold than controls (P<.001) (1.3±0.9° vs 0.8±0.6°). Furthermore, all subjects had the largest motion perception threshold in the transverse plane (P<.001) (1.2±0.7° vs 1.0±0.8° for all other planes averaged). There was no significant difference between LBP and healthy control groups in the repositioning tasks. Errors in the active repositioning test were significantly smaller than in the passive repositioning test (P=.032) (1.9±1.2° vs 2.3±1.4°).


      These findings suggest that impairments in proprioception may be detected in patients with LBP when assessed with a motion perception threshold measure.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient), LBP (low back pain)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kandel E.R.
        • Schwartz J.H.
        • Jessell T.M.
        Principles of neural science.
        in: 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, New York2000: 443
        • Reeves N.P.
        • Narendra K.S.
        • Cholewicki J.
        Spine stability: the six blind men and the elephant.
        Clin Biomech. 2007; 22: 266-274
        • Gandevia S.C.
        • Refshauge K.M.
        • Collins D.F.
        Proprioception: peripheral inputs and perceptual interactions.
        Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 508: 61-68
        • Holm S.
        • Indahl A.
        • Solomonow M.
        Sensorimotor control of the spine.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002; 12: 219-234
        • Sjölander P.
        • Johansson H.
        • Djupsjöbacka M.
        Spinal and supraspinal effects of activity in ligament afferents.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002; 12: 167-176
        • Solomonow M.
        Sensory-motor control of ligaments and associated neuromuscular disorders.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 16: 549-567
        • Nitz A.J.
        • Peck D.
        Comparison of muscle spindle concentrations in large and small human epaxial muscles acting in parallel combinations.
        Am Surg. 1986; 52: 273-277
        • Gandevia S.C.
        • McCloskey D.I.
        • Burke D.
        Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction.
        Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15: 62-65
        • Brumagne S.
        • Cordo P.
        • Lysens R.
        • Verschueren S.
        • Swinnen S.
        The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 989-994
        • Radebold A.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Panjabi M.M.
        • Patel T.C.
        Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 947-954
        • Radebold A.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Polzhofer G.K.
        • Greene H.S.
        Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain.
        Spine. 2001; 26: 724-730
        • Reeves N.P.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Milner T.E.
        Muscle reflex classification of low-back pain.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005; 15: 53-60
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Silfies S.P.
        • Shah R.A.
        • et al.
        Delayed trunk muscle reflex responses increase the risk of low back injuries.
        Spine. 2005; 30: 2614-2620
        • Luoto S.
        • Aalto H.
        • Taimela S.
        • Hurri H.
        • Pyykko I.
        • Alaranta H.
        One-footed and externally disturbed two-footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 2081-2089
        • Takala E.-P.
        • Korhonen I.
        • Viikari-Juntura E.
        Postural sway and stepping response among working population: Reproducibility, long-term stability, and associations with symptoms of the low back.
        Clin Biomech. 1997; 12: 429-437
        • Mientjes M.I.
        • Frank J.S.
        Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing.
        Clin Biomech. 1999; 14: 710-716
        • Byl N.N.
        • Sinnott P.L.
        Variations in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults.
        Spine. 1991; 16: 325-330
        • Henry S.M.
        • Hitt J.R.
        • Jones S.L.
        • Bunn J.Y.
        Decreased limits of stability in response to postural perturbations in subjects with low back pain.
        Clin Biomech. 2006; 21: 881-892
        • Brumagne S.
        • Cordo P.
        • Verschueren S.
        Proprioceptive weighting changes in persons with low back pain and elderly persons during upright standing.
        Neurosci Lett. 2004; 366: 63-66
        • della Volpe R.
        • Popa T.
        • Ginanneschi F.
        • Spidalieri R.
        • Mazzocchio R.
        • Rossi A.
        Changes in coordination of postural control during dynamic stance in chronic low back pain patients.
        Gait Posture. 2006; 24: 349-355
        • van Dieën J.H.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Radebold A.
        Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 834-841
        • van Dieën J.H.
        • Selen L.P.
        • Cholewicki J.
        Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13: 333-351
        • Hodges P.
        • van den Hoorn W.
        • Dawson A.
        • Cholewicki J.
        Changes in the mechanical properties of the trunk in low back pain may be associated with recurrence.
        J Biomech. 2009; 42: 61-66
        • Hodges P.W.
        • Richardson C.A.
        Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1005-1012
        • Lariviere C.
        • Gagnon D.
        • Loisel P.
        The comparison of trunk muscles EMG activation between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extension and lateral bending tasks.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000; 10: 79-91
        • Field E.
        • Abdel-Moty E.
        • Loudon J.
        The effect of back injury and load on ability to replicate a novel posture.
        J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1997; 8: 199-207
        • Gill K.P.
        • Callaghan M.J.
        The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 371-377
        • O'Sullivan P.B.
        • Burnett A.
        • Floyd A.N.
        • et al.
        Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 1074-1079
        • Taimela S.
        • Kankaanpaa M.
        • Luoto S.
        The effect of lumbar fatigue on the ability to sense a change in lumbar position.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 1322-1327
        • Leinonen V.
        • Kankaanpaa M.
        • Luukkonen M.
        • et al.
        Lumbar paraspinal muscle function, perception of lumbar position, and postural control in discherniation-related back pain.
        Spine. 2003; 28: 842-848
        • Leinonen V.
        • Maatta S.
        • Taimela S.
        • et al.
        Impaired lumbar movement perception in association with postural stability and motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials in lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 975-983
        • Lam S.S.
        • Jull G.
        • Treleaven J.
        Lumbar spine kinesthesia in patients with low back pain.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999; 29: 294-299
        • Koumantakis G.A.
        • Winstanley J.
        • Oldham J.A.
        Thoracolumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain: intratester reliability, clinical applicability, and validity.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002; 32: 327-335
        • Descarreaux M.
        • Blouin J.S.
        • Teasdale N.
        Repositioning accuracy and movement parameters in low back pain subjects and healthy control subjects.
        Eur Spine J. 2005; 14: 185-191
        • Åsell M.
        • Sjölander P.
        • Kerschbaumer H.
        • Djupsjöbacka M.
        Are lumbar repositioning errors larger among patients with chronic low back pain compared with asymptomatic subjects?.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 1170-1176
        • Silfies S.P.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Reeves N.P.
        • Greene H.S.
        Lumbar position sense and the risk of low back injuries in college athletes: a prospective cohort study.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007; 8: 129
        • Preuss R.
        • Grenier S.
        • McGill S.
        The effect of test position on lumbar spine position sense.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003; 33: 73-78
        • Lönn J.
        • Crenshaw A.G.
        • Djupsjöbacka M.
        • Pedersen J.
        • Johansson H.
        Position sense testing: influence of starting position and type of displacement.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 592-597
        • Paillard J.
        • Brouchon M.
        Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense.
        in: Freedman S.E. The neurophysiology of spatially oriented behavior. The Dorsey Pr, Homewood1968: 37-55
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Shah K.R.
        • McGill K.C.
        The effects of a 3-week use of lumbosacral orthoses on proprioception in the lumbar spine.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: 225-231
        • Reeves N.P.
        • Cholewicki J.
        • Lee A.S.
        • Mysliwiec L.W.
        The effects of stochastic resonance stimulation on spine proprioception and postural control in chronic low back pain patients.
        Spine. 2009; 34: 316-321
        • Parkhurst T.M.
        • Burnett C.N.
        Injury and proprioception in the lower back.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994; 19: 282-295
        • Lönn J.
        • Crenshaw A.G.
        • Djupsjöbacka M.
        • Johansson H.
        Reliability of position sense testing assessed with a fully automated system.
        Clin Physiol. 2000; 20: 30-37
        • Pickard C.M.
        • Sullivan P.E.
        • Allison G.T.
        • Singer K.P.
        Is there a difference in hip joint position sense between young and older groups?.
        J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003; 58: 631-635
        • Delbono O.
        Neural control of aging skeletal muscle.
        Aging Cell. 2003; 2: 21-29
        • Petrella R.J.
        • Lattanzio P.J.
        • Nelson M.G.
        Effect of age and activity on knee joint proprioception.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 76: 235-241
        • Skinner H.B.
        • Barrack R.L.
        • Cook S.D.
        Age-related decline in proprioception.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; : 208-211
        • Aydin T.
        • Yildiz Y.
        • Yildiz C.
        • Atesalp S.
        • Kalyon T.A.
        Proprioception of the ankle: a comparison between female teenaged gymnasts and controls.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2002; 23: 123-129
        • Muaidi Q.I.
        • Nicholson L.L.
        • Refshauge K.M.
        Do elite athletes exhibit enhanced proprioceptive acuity, range and strength of knee rotation compared with non-athletes?.
        Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009; 19: 103-112
        • Lephart S.M.
        • Giraldo J.L.
        • Borsa P.A.
        • Fu F.H.
        Knee joint proprioception: a comparison between female intercollegiate gymnasts and controls.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996; 4: 121-124
        • Fritz J.M.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
        Phys Ther. 2001; 81: 776-788