Metabolic and Biomechanical Effects of Velocity and Weight Support Using a Lower-Body Positive Pressure Device During Walking


      Grabowski AM. Metabolic and biomechanical effects of velocity and weight support using a lower-body positive pressure device during walking.


      To determine how changes in velocity and weight support affect metabolic power and ground reaction forces (GRFs) during walking using a lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) device. To find specific velocity and weight combinations that require similar aerobic demands but different peak GRFs.


      Repeated measures.


      University research laboratory.


      Healthy volunteer subjects (N=10).


      Subjects walked 1.00, 1.25, and 1.50m/s on a force-measuring treadmill at normal weight (1.0 body weight [BW]) and at several fractions of BW (.25, .50, .75, .85 BW). The treadmill was enclosed within an LBPP apparatus that supported BW.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Metabolic power, GRFs, and stride kinematics.


      At faster velocities, peak GRFs and metabolic demands were greater. In contrast, walking at lower fractions of BW attenuated peak GRFs and reduced metabolic demand compared with normal weight walking. Many combinations of velocity and BW resulted in similar aerobic demands, yet walking faster with weight support lowered peak GRFs compared with normal weight walking.


      Manipulating velocity and weight using an LBPP device during treadmill walking can reduce force yet maintain cardiorespiratory demand. Thus, LBPP treadmill training devices could be highly effective for rehabilitation after orthopedic injury and/or orthopedic procedures.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      BW (body weight), GRF (ground reaction force), LBPP (lower-body positive pressure), NMP (net metabolic power)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Eastlack R.K.
        • Hargens A.R.
        • Groppo E.R.
        • Steinbach G.C.
        • White M.K.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        Lower body positive-pressure exercise after knee surgery.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 431: 213-219
        • Hesse S.
        • Werner C.
        • Seibel H.
        • et al.
        Treadmill training with partial body-weight support after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1767-1773
        • Bartels E.M.
        • Lund H.
        • Hagen K.B.
        • Dagfinrud H.
        • Christensen R.
        • Danneskiold-Samsøe B.
        Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 4: 1469-1493
        • Foley A.
        • Halbert J.
        • Hewitt T.
        • Crotty M.
        Does hydrotherapy improve strength and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis—a randomised controlled trial comparing a gym based and a hydrotherapy based strengthening programme.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2003; 62: 1162-1167
        • Hinman R.S.
        • Heywood S.E.
        • Day A.R.
        Aquatic physical therapy for hip and knee osteoarthritis: results of a single-blind randomized control trial.
        Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 32-43
        • Rahmann A.E.
        • Brauer S.G.
        • Nitz J.C.
        A specific inpatient aquatic physiotherapy program improves strength after total hip or knee replacement surgery: a randomized control trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 745-755
        • Ralston H.J.
        Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking.
        Int Z angew Physiol einschl Arbeitsphysiol. 1958; 17: S277-S283
        • Martin P.E.
        • Rothstein D.E.
        • Larish D.D.
        Effects of age and physical-activity status on the speed-aerobic demand relationship of walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 1992; 73: 200-206
        • Waters R.L.
        • Lunsford B.R.
        • Perry J.
        • Byrd R.
        Energy speed relationship of walking—standard tables.
        J Orthop Res. 1988; 6: 215-222
        • White S.C.
        • Yack H.J.
        • Tucker C.A.
        • Lin H.Y.
        Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30: 1537-1542
        • Griffin T.M.
        • Roberts T.J.
        • Kram R.
        Metabolic cost of generating muscular force in human walking: insights from load-carrying and speed experiments.
        J Appl Physiol. 2003; 95: 172-183
        • Nilsson J.
        • Thorstensson A.
        Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running.
        Acta Physiol Scand. 1989; 136: 217-227
        • Grabowski A.
        • Farley C.T.
        • Kram R.
        Independent metabolic costs of supporting body weight and accelerating body mass during walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 2005; 98: 579-583
        • Farley C.T.
        • McMahon T.A.
        Energetics of walking and running: insights from simulated reduced-gravity experiments.
        J Appl Physiol. 1992; 73: 2709-2712
        • Ivanenko Y.P.
        • Grasso R.
        • Macellari V.
        • Lacquaniti F.
        Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity.
        J Neurophysiol. 2002; 87: 3070-3089
        • Griffin T.M.
        • Tolani N.A.
        • Kram R.
        Walking in simulated reduced gravity: mechanical energy fluctuations and exchange.
        J Appl Physiol. 1999; 86: 383-390
        • Chevutschi A.
        • Alberty M.
        • Lensel G.
        • Pardessus V.
        • Thevenon A.
        Comparison of maximal and spontaneous speeds during walking on dry land and water.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 403-407
        • Barela A.M.
        • Stolf S.F.
        • Duarte M.
        Biomechanical characteristics of adults walking in shallow water and on land.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 16: 250-256
        • Miyoshi T.
        • Shirota T.
        • Yamamoto S.
        • Nakazawa K.
        • Akai M.
        Effect of the walking speed to the lower limb joint angular displacements, joint moments and ground reaction forces during walking in water.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26: 724-732
        • Poyhonen T.
        • Keskinen K.L.
        • Hautala A.
        • Malkia E.
        Determination of hydrodynamic drag forces and drag coefficients on human leg/foot model during knee exercise.
        Clin Biomech. 2000; 15: 256-260
        • Cutuk A.
        • Groppo E.R.
        • Quigley E.J.
        • White K.W.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • Hargens A.R.
        Ambulation in simulated fractional gravity using lower body positive pressure: cardiovascular safety and gait analyses.
        J Appl Physiol. 2006; 101: 771-777
        • Grabowski A.M.
        • Kram R.
        Effects of velocity and weight support on ground reaction forces and metabolic power during running.
        J Appl Biomech. 2008; 24: 288-297
        • Kram R.
        • Griffin T.M.
        • Donelan J.M.
        • Chang Y.H.
        A force-treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces.
        J Appl Physiol. 1998; 85: 764-769
      1. Whalen RT, Breit GA, Schwandt D. Simulation of hypo- and hyper-gravity locomotion. In Proceedings from the 18th American Society of Biomechanics Conference, Columbus, OH, 1994;209-10.

        • Brockway J.M.
        Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.
        Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1987; 41: 463-471
        • Davis B.L.
        • Cavanagh P.R.
        Decomposition of superimposed ground reaction forces into left and right force profiles.
        J Biomech. 1993; 26: 593-597
        • De Witt J.K.
        • Hagan R.D.
        • Cromwell R.L.
        The effect of increasing inertia upon vertical ground reaction forces and temporal kinematics during locomotion.
        J Exp Biol. 2008; 211: 1087-1092
        • Gottschall J.S.
        • Kram R.
        Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 2003; 94: 1766-1772
        • Ortega J.D.
        • Fehlman L.A.
        • Farley C.T.
        Effects of aging and arm swing on the metabolic cost of stability in human walking.
        J Biomech. 2008; 41: 3303-3308
        • Belli A.
        • Bui P.
        • Berger A.
        • Geyssant A.
        • Lacour J.
        A treadmill ergometer for three-dimensional ground reaction forces measurement during walking.
        J Biomech. 2001; 34: 105-112
        • Finch L.
        • Barbeau H.
        • Arsenault B.
        Influence of body-weight support on normal human gait—development of a gait retraining strategy.
        Phys Ther. 1991; 71: 842-856
        • Colby S.M.
        • Kirkendall D.T.
        • Bruzga R.F.
        Electromyographic analysis and energy expenditure of harness supported treadmill walking: implications for knee rehabilitation.
        Gait Posture. 1999; 10: 200-205
        • Ferris D.P.
        • Aagaard P.
        • Simonsen E.B.
        • Farley C.T.
        • Dyhre-Poulsen P.
        Soleus H-reflex gain in humans walking and running under simulated reduced gravity.
        J Physiol. 2001; 530: 167-180
        • Cavagna G.A.
        • Thys H.
        • Zamboni A.
        Sources of external work in level walking and running.
        J Physiol (London). 1976; 262: 639-657
        • Browning R.C.
        • Baker E.A.
        • Herron J.A.
        • Kram R.
        Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 2006; 100: 390-398
        • Waters R.L.
        • Mulroy S.
        The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait.
        Gait Posture. 1999; 9: 207-231