The Effectiveness of Walking Stick Use for Neurogenic Claudication: Results From a Randomized Trial and the Effects on Walking Tolerance and Posture


      Comer CM, Johnson MI, Marchant PR, Redmond AC, Bird HA, Conaghan PG. The effectiveness of walking stick use for neurogenic claudication: results from a randomized trial and the effects on walking tolerance and posture.


      To determine the immediate effects of using a stick on walking tolerance and on the potential explanatory variable of posture, and to provide a preliminary evaluation of the effects of daily walking stick use on symptoms and function for people with neurogenic claudication.


      A 2-phase study of neurogenic claudication patients comprising a randomized trial of 2 weeks of home use of a walking stick and a crossover study comparing walking tolerance and posture with and without a walking stick.


      A primary care–based musculoskeletal service.


      Patients aged 50 years or older with neurogenic claudication symptoms (N=46; 24 women, 22 men, mean age=71.26y) were recruited.


      Walking stick.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Phase 1 of the trial used the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire symptom severity and physical function scores to measure outcome. The total walking distance during a shuttle walking test and the mean lumbar spinal posture (measured by using electronic goniometry) were used as the primary outcome measurements in the second phase.


      Forty of the participants completed phase 1 of the trial, and 40 completed phase 2. No significant differences in symptom severity or physical function were shown in score improvements for walking stick users (stick user scores − control scores) in the 2-week trial (95% confidence interval [CI], −.24 to .28 and −.10 to .26, respectively). In the second phase of the trial, the ratio of the shuttle walking distance with a stick to without a stick showed no significance (95% CI, .959–1.096) between the groups. Furthermore, the use of a walking stick did not systematically promote spinal flexion; no significant difference was shown for mean lumbar spinal flexion for stick use versus no stick (95% CI, .351°–.836°).


      The prescription of a walking stick does not improve walking tolerance or systematically alter the postural mechanisms associated with symptoms in neurogenic claudication.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      CI (confidence interval), NC (neurogenic claudication)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Porter R.W.
        Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 2046-2052
        • Willen J.
        • Danielson B.
        • Gaulitz A.
        • Niklason T.
        • Schonstrom N.
        • Hansson T.
        Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2968-2976
        • Atlas S.J.
        • Delitto A.
        Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; Feb: 198-207
        • Gibson J.N.
        • Waddell G.
        Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 2312-2320
      1. Bulstrode C. Buckwalter J. Carr A. Oxford textbook of orthopaedics & trauma. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford2002
      2. Evans J.G. Williams T.F. Beattie B.L. Michel J.P. Wilcock G.K. The Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford University Pr, Oxford2003
        • Pratt R.K.
        • Fairbank J.C.
        • Virr A.
        The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27: 84-91
      3. Kirkwood B. Sterne J. Essential medical statistics. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford2003
      4. Watson M.S. Oxford handbook of palliative care. 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford2005
        • Singh S.J.
        • Morgan M.D.
        • Scott S.
        • Walters D.
        • Hardman A.E.
        Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction.
        Thorax. 1992; 47: 1019-1024
      5. Matthews J.N. An introduction to randomised controlled clinical trials. Arnold Publishers, London2000 (Arnold; 2000)
        • Goldman S.M.
        • Barice E.J.
        • Schneider W.R.
        • Hennekens C.H.
        Lumbar spinal stenosis: can positional therapy alleviate pain?.
        J Fam Pract. 2008; 57: 257-260
        • Zeifang F.
        • Schiltenwolf M.
        • Abel R.
        • Moradi B.
        Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9: 89
        • Goldman S.M.
        Neurogenic positional pedal neuritis.
        J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003; 93: 174-184
        • Goldman S.
        Value of a grocery cart and walker in identification and management of symptomatic spinal stenosis in diabetic patients presenting with peripheral neuropathy or claudication [Letter].
        Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 1943
        • Oğuz H.
        • Levendoğlu F.
        • Oğün T.C.
        • Tantu A.
        Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.
        Eur Spine J. 2007; 16: 913-918