Advertisement

Metabolic and Mechanical Energy Costs of Reducing Vertical Center of Mass Movement During Gait

      Abstract

      Gordon KE, Ferris DP, Kuo AD. Metabolic and mechanical energy costs of reducing vertical center of mass movement during gait.

      Objectives

      To test the hypothesis that reducing vertical center of mass (COM) displacement will lower the metabolic cost of human walking. To examine changes in joint work associated with increasing and decreasing vertical COM movement during gait.

      Design

      Randomized repeated measures.

      Setting

      Human Neuromechanics Laboratory, University of Michigan.

      Participants

      Able-bodied subjects (N=10).

      Interventions

      Subjects walked at 1.2m/s on a treadmill and overground. Subjects manipulated vertical COM displacement either by adjusting stride length or by using visual feedback to reduce COM movement.

      Main Outcome Measures

      We measured kinematic and kinetic data to calculate vertical and lateral COM displacements, joint torques, and work. In addition, we collected oxygen consumption to calculated metabolic power.

      Results

      Increasing and decreasing vertical COM displacement beyond subjects' preferred range resulted in increases in the metabolic cost of walking. When vertical COM displacement was reduced, corresponding increases in positive ankle and hip work and negative knee work were observed.

      Conclusions

      Humans are capable of walking in a manner that will reduce COM displacement from normal. Decreasing vertical COM movement results in increases in metabolic energy costs because of greater mechanical work performed at the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Thus, reducing vertical COM movement is not a successful strategy for improving either metabolic or mechanical energy economy during normal walking by able-bodied subjects.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      ANOVA (analysis of variance), COM (center of mass), PSL (preferred stride length), VFB (visual feedback), V̇o2 (oxygen consumption)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Saunders J.
        • Inman V.T.
        • Eberhart H.D.
        The major determinants in normal and pathological gait.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953; 35: 543-558
        • Cavagna G.A.
        • Kaneko M.
        Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running.
        J Physiol. 1977; 268: 647-681
        • Cavagna G.A.
        • Thys H.
        • Zamboni A.
        The sources of external work in level walking and running.
        J Physiol. 1976; 262: 639-657
        • Alexander R.M.
        Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running.
        J Exp Biol. 1991; 160: 55-69
        • Ortega J.D.
        • Farley C.T.
        Minimizing center of mass vertical movement increases metabolic cost in walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99: 2099-2107
        • Massaad F.
        • Lejeune T.M.
        • Detrembleur C.
        The up and down bobbing of human walking: a compromise between muscle work and efficiency.
        J Physiol. 2007; 582 ([published erratum appears in J Physiol 2007;583(Pt 1):413]): 789-799
        • Alexander R.M.
        Energetics and optimization of human walking and running: the 2000 Raymond Pearl Memorial Lecture.
        Am J Hum Biol. 2002; 14: 641-648
        • Bertram J.E.
        • Ruina A.
        Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization.
        J Theor Biol. 2001; 209: 445-453
        • Cavagna G.A.
        • Franzetti P.
        The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans.
        J Physiol. 1986; 373: 235-242
        • Donelan J.M.
        • Kram R.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268: 1985-1992
        • Donelan J.M.
        • Kram R.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking.
        J Exp Biol. 2002; 205: 3717-3727
        • Bertram J.E.
        Constrained optimization in human walking: cost minimization and gait plasticity.
        J Exp Biol. 2005; 208: 979-991
        • Workman J.M.
        • Armstrong B.W.
        Oxygen cost of treadmill walking.
        J Appl Physiol. 1963; 18: 798-803
        • Bastien G.J.
        • Willems P.A.
        • Schepens B.
        • Heglund N.C.
        Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005; 94: 76-83
        • Choi H.
        Physical medicine and rehabilitation pocketpedia.
        in: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2003: 26
        • Cuccurullo S.
        Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Review.
        in: Demos Medical Publishing, New York2004: 411
        • Gage J.R.
        Normal gait.
        in: Gait analysis in cerebral palsy (clinics in developmental medicine). Mac Keith, London1991: 67
        • Gross J.
        • Fetto J.
        • Rosen E.
        Musculoskeletal examination.
        in: Blackwell Science, Cambridge1996: 443
        • Houglum P.A.
        Therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal injuries.
        in: 2nd ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign2005: 359
        • Knudson D.V.
        • Morrison C.S.
        Qualitative analysis of human movement.
        in: 2nd ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign2002: 184
        • Malanga G.
        • Delisa J.A.
        Clinical Observation.
        in: DeLisa J.A. Gait analysis in the science of rehabilitation. Diane Publishing, Baltimore2000: 2
        • Medved V.
        Measurement of human locomotion.
        in: CRC Pr, Boca Raton2001: 63
        • Pedotti A.
        • Ferrarin M.
        Restoration of walking for paraplegics: recent advancements and trends.
        in: IOS Pr, Amsterdam1992: 23
        • Perry J.
        Gait analysis: normal and pathological function.
        in: Slack Inc, Thorofare1992: 40
        • Polak F.
        Gait Analysis.
        in: Pitt-Brooke J. Rehabilitation of movement: theoretical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, 1998: 292
        • Seymour R.
        Prosthetics and orthotics: lower limb and spinal.
        in: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2002: 103
        • Spivack B.S.
        Evaluation and management of gait disorders.
        in: Informa Healthcare, London1995: 318
        • Whittle M.W.
        Gait analysis: an introduction.
        in: Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston1996: 97
        • Wright V.
        • Radin E.L.
        Mechanics of human joints: physiology, pathophysiology, and treatment.
        in: Marcel Dekker, New York1993: 96
        • Perry J.
        Gait analysis of normal and pathological function.
        Slack Inc, Thorofare1992
        • Gard S.A.
        • Childress D.S.
        The influence of stance-phase knee flexion on the vertical displacement of the trunk during normal walking.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 26-32
        • Gard S.A.
        • Childress D.S.
        The effect of pelvic list on the vertical displacement of the trunk during normal walking.
        Gait Posture. 1997; 5: 233-238
        • Gard S.A.
        • Childress D.S.
        What determines the vertical displacement of the body during normal walking?.
        J Prosthet Orthot. 2001; 13: 64-67
        • Della Croce U.
        • Riley P.O.
        • Lelas J.L.
        • Kerrigan D.C.
        A refined view of the determinants of gait.
        Gait Posture. 2001; 14: 79-84
        • Kerrigan D.C.
        • Riley P.O.
        • Lelas J.L.
        • Della Croce U.
        Quantification of pelvic rotation as a determinant of gait.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 217-220
        • Rose J.
        • Gamble J.G.
        Human walking.
        3rd ed. Lippincott, Willams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2006
        • Whittle M.W.
        Gait analysis: an introduction.
        4th ed. Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, Edinburgh2007
        • Kuo A.D.
        The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: a dynamic walking perspective.
        Hum Mov Sci. 2007; 26: 617-656
        • Brockway J.M.
        Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man.
        Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1987; 41: 463-471
        • Cavagna G.A.
        Force platforms as ergometers.
        J Appl Physiol. 1975; 39: 174-179
        • Gard S.A.
        • Miff S.C.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking.
        Hum Mov Sci. 2004; 22: 597-610
        • McMahon T.A.
        • Valiant G.
        • Frederick E.C.
        Groucho running.
        J Appl Physiol. 1987; 62: 2326-2337
        • Winter D.A.
        Knee flexion during stance as a determinant of inefficient walking.
        Phys Ther. 1983; 63: 331-333
        • Gard S.A.
        • Childress D.S.
        The influence of stance-phase knee flexion on the vertical displacement of the trunk during normal walking.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 26-32
        • Doke J.
        • Donelan J.M.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg.
        J Exp Biol. 2005; 208: 439-445
        • Doke J.
        • Kuo A.D.
        Energetic cost of producing muscle force, rather than work, to swing the human leg.
        J Exp Biol. 2007; 210: 2390-2398
        • Kuo A.D.
        Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model.
        J Biomech Eng. 2002; 124: 113-120