Abstract
Brach JS, Perera S, Studenski S, Newman AB. The reliability and validity of measures
of gait variability in community-dwelling older adults.
Objective
To examine the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of variability of gait
characteristics.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Research laboratory.
Participants
Older adults (N=558) from the Cardiovascular Health Study.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Gait characteristics were measured using a 4-m computerized walkway. SD determined
from the steps recorded were used as the measures of variability. Intraclass correlation
coefficients (ICC) were calculated to examine test-retest reliability of a 4-m walk
and two 4-m walks. To establish concurrent validity, the measures of gait variability
were compared across levels of health, functional status, and physical activity using
independent t tests and analysis of variances.
Results
Gait variability measures from the two 4-m walks demonstrated greater test-retest
reliability than those from the single 4-m walk (ICC=.22–.48 and ICC=.40–.63, respectively).
Greater step length and stance time variability were associated with poorer health,
functional status and physical activity (P<.05).
Conclusions
Gait variability calculated from a limited number of steps has fair to good test-retest
reliability and concurrent validity. Reliability of gait variability calculated from
a greater number of steps should be assessed to determine if the consistency can be
improved.
Key Words
List of Abbreviations:
ADLs (activities of daily living), CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study), IADLs (instrumental activities of daily living), ICC (intraclass correlation coefficient)To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Gait changes in older adults: predictors of falls or indicators of fear?.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 313-320
- Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1050-1056
- Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005; 2: 21
- Gait variability and the risk of incident mobility disability.J Gerontol Med Sci. 2007; 62A: 983-988
- Measurement and Clinical Practice: Theory and application.in: Rothstein J.M. Measurement in physical therapy. Churchill Livingstone, New York1985: 1-46
- Are performance-based measures sufficiently reliable for use in multicenter trials?.J Gerontol. 1999; 54A: M3
- Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants.Age Aging. 1997; 26: 15-19
- Reliability of physical performance and self-reported functional measures in an older population.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998; 53A: M295-M300
- The validity and reliability of the GAITRite system's measurements: A preliminary evaluation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 419-425
- Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite).BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004; 17: 5-13
- Measuring step kinematic variability on an instrumented treadmill: how many steps are enough?.J Biomechanics. 2003; 36: 1215-1218
- Increasing the number of gait trial recordings maximises intra-rater reliability of the CODA motion analysis system.Gait Posture. 2007; 25: 303-315
- Etiology and modification of gait instability in older adults: a randomized controlled trial of exercise.J Appl Physiol. 2001; 90: 2117-2129
- Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the cardiovascular health study.Ann Epidemiol. 1993; 3: 358-366
- The cardiovascular health study:design and rationale.Ann Epidemiol. 1991; 1: 263-276
- Foot fall measurement Technology.in: Craik R.L. Oatis C.A. GaitAnalysis: theory and application. Mosby-Year Book, Inc, St. Louis1995: 125-142
- Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 278-283
- Step width variability, but not step length variability or step time variability, discriminates gait of healthy young and older adults during treadmill locomotion.J Biomech. 2004; 37: 935-938
- National Health Interview Survey.Vital Health Stat. 1987; 21 (Publication DHHS (PHS) 87-1323): 1-115
- Fundamentals of Biostatistics.4th ed. Duxbury Pr, Belmont1995
- Comparison of gait of young and elderly men.Phys Ther. 1989; 69: 144-148
- Comparison of gait of young women and elderly women.Phys Ther. 1986; 66: 1382-1387
- Studies of gait and mobility in the elderly.Age Ageing. 1981; 10: 147-156
- Functional community ambulation: what are your criteria?.Clinical Management. 1986; 6: 12-15
- The effect of age and variability in gait.J Gerontol. 1984; 39: 662-666
- Mechanical and metabolic requirments for active lateral stabilization in human walking.J Biomech. 2004; 37: 827-835
Article info
Footnotes
Supported by the National Institutes of Health Public Health Service (grant no. TG32 AG00181) and the National Institutes of Health contracts (grant no. N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, N01-HC-85079 through 85085, and HL 87079 through 87086); and the University of Pittsburgh Older American's Independence Center (grant no. P30 AG024827); the National Institutes of Health Public Health Service (grant no. TG32 AG00181); a National Institutes on Aging and American Federation of Aging Research Paul Beeson Career Development Award (grant no. K23 AG026766). The sponsor had no direct role in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Reprints are not available from the author.
Identification
Copyright
© 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
