Spinal Cord Injury Medicine. 3. Rehabilitation Phase After Acute Spinal Cord Injury


      Kirshblum SC, Priebe MM, Ho CH, Scelza WM, Chiodo AE, Wuermser LA. Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury.
      This self-directed learning module highlights the rehabilitation aspects of care for people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). It is part of the chapter on SCI medicine in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation. This article specifically focuses on the formulation of a rehabilitation plan based on functional goals by level of injury. Such a plan includes mobility, activities of daily living, equipment needs, and adjustment issues after injury. The effect of a concomitant brain injury on rehabilitation is discussed. Medical complications seen in the rehabilitation stage such as autonomic dysreflexia, heterotopic ossification, neurogenic bowel, and orthostasis are addressed. Preparation for discharge is crucial to allow for a smooth transition to home. There have been advances in SCI rehabilitation research including in wheelchair technology, functional electric stimulation, and partial body weight−supported ambulation.

      Overall Article Objective

      To describe outcomes and issues that may arise during the rehabilitation phase after spinal cord injury.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Key reference.
        • Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine
        Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical practice guidelines for health-care professionals. Paralyzed Veterans of America, Washington (DC)1999
        • Kirshblum S.
        • Ho C.H.
        • House J.G.
        • Druin E.
        • Nead C.
        • Drastal S.
        Rehabilitation of spinal cord injury.
        in: Kirshblum S.C. Campagnolo D.I. DeLisa J.A. Spinal cord medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2002: 275-298
        • Scivoletto G.
        • Morganti B.
        • Molinari M.
        Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 512-516
        • Sumida M.
        • Fujimoto M.
        • Tokuhiro A.
        • Tominaga A.
        • Uchida R.
        Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 391-395
        • Smith M.
        Efficacy of specialist versus non-specialist management of spinal cord injury within the UK.
        Spinal Cord. 2002; 40: 11-16
        • Wilmot C.B.
        • Cope D.N.
        • Hall K.M.
        • Acker M.
        Occult head injury: its incidence in spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985; 66: 227-231
        • Macciocchi S.N.
        • Bowman B.
        • Coker J.
        • Apple D.
        • Leslie D.
        Effect of co-morbid traumatic brain injury on functional outcome of persons with spinal cord injuries.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 83: 22-26
      2. Key reference.
        • Davidoff G.N.
        • Roth E.J.
        • Richards J.S.
        Cognitive deficits in spinal cord injury: epidemiology and outcome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 275-284
        • Davidoff G.
        • Thomas P.
        • Johnson M.
        • Berent S.
        • Dijkers M.
        • Doljanac R.
        Closed head injury in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: incidence and risk factors.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69: 869-872
        • Strubreither W.
        • Hackbusch B.
        • Hermann-Gruber M.
        • Stahr G.
        • Jonas H.P.
        Neuropsychological aspects of the rehabilitation of patients with paralysis from a spinal injury who also have a brain injury.
        Spinal Cord. 1997; 35: 487-492
        • Sommer J.L.
        • Witkiewicz P.M.
        The therapeutic challenges of dual diagnosis: TBI/SCI.
        Brain Inj. 2004; 18: 1297-1308
        • Lombard L.A.
        • Zafonte R.D.
        Agitation after traumatic brain injury: considerations and treatment options.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84: 797-812
      3. Key reference.
        • Dowler R.N.
        • Harrington D.L.
        • Haaland K.Y.
        • Swanda R.M.
        • Fee F.
        • Fiedler K.
        Profiles of cognitive functioning in chronic spinal cord injury and the role of moderating variables.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1997; 3: 464-472
        • Teasell R.
        • Arnold J.
        • Krassioukov A.
        Cardiovascular consequences of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 506-516
        • Lindan R.
        • Joiner E.
        • Freehafer A.A.
        • Hazel C.
        Incidence and clinical features of autonomic dysreflexia in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Paraplegia. 1980; 18: 285-292
        • Kirshblum S.C.
        • House J.G.
        • O’Connor K.C.
        Silent autonomic dysreflexia during a routine bowel program in persons with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1774-1776
      4. Key reference.
        • Stiens S.A.
        • Lutrel W.
        • Binard J.E.
        Polyethylene glycol versus vegetable oil based bisacodyl suppositories to initiate side-lying bowel care: a clinical trial in persons with spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 777-781
        • Stiens S.A.
        • Bergman S.B.
        • Goetz L.L.
        Neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: S86-S102
      5. Key reference.
        • Rosito O.
        • Nino-Murcia M.
        • Wolfe V.A.
        • Kiralti J.
        • Perkash I.
        The effects of colostomy on the quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2002; 25: 174-183
        • Massagli T.L.
        • Cardenas D.D.
        Immobilization hypercalcemia treatment with pamidronate disodium after spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80 (998-100)
        • Estores I.
        • Harrington A.
        • Banovac K.
        C-reactive protein and ESR rate in patients with HO.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2004; 27: 434-437
        • Singh R.S.
        • Craig M.C.
        • Katholi C.R.
        • Jackson A.B.
        • Mountz J.M.
        The predictive value of creatine phosphokinase and alkaline phosphatase in identification of heterotopic ossification in patients after spinal cord injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1584-1588
        • Banovac K.
        • Sherman A.L.
        • Estores I.M.
        • Banovac F.
        Prevention and treatment of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2004; 27: 376-382
      6. Key reference.
        • Kirshblum S.
        New rehabilitation interventions in spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2004; 27;: 342-350
        • Peckham P.H.
        • Gorman P.H.
        Functional electrical stimulation in the 21st century.
        Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2005; 10: 126-150
      7. Key reference.
        • DiMarco A.F.
        • Onders R.P.
        • Ignagni A.
        • Kowalski K.E.
        Inspiratory muscle pacing in spinal cord injury: case report and clinical commentary.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 29: 95-108
        • DiMarco A.F.
        • Kowalski K.E.
        • Geertman R.T.
        • Hromyal D.R.
        Spinal cord stimulation: a new method to produce an effective cough in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173: 1386-1389
        • Bogie K.M.
        • Wang X.
        • Triolo R.J.
        Long-term prevention of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: a single case study of the use of gluteal neuromuscular electric stimulation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87: 585-591
        • Algood S.D.
        • Cooper R.A.
        • Fitzgerald S.G.
        • Cooper R.
        • Boninger M.L.
        Effect of a pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair on the functional capabilities of persons with tetraplegia.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 380-386
        • Boninger M.L.
        • Koontz A.M.
        • Sisto S.A.
        • et al.
        Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005; 42: 9-19
        • Dobkin B.
        Overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: a neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials.
        NeuroRehabil Neural Repair. 1999; 13: 157-165
        • Barbeau H.
        Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts.
        NeuroRehabil Neurol Repair. 2003; 17: 3-11
        • Protas E.J.
        • Holmes S.A.
        • Qureshy H.
        • Johnson A.
        • Lee D.
        • Sherwood A.M.
        Supported treadmill ambulation training after spinal cord injury: a pilot study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 825-831
        • Wernig A.
        • Nanassy A.
        • Muller S.
        Maintenance of locomotor abilities following Laufband (treadmill) therapy in para- and tetraplegic persons: follow-up studies.
        Spinal Cord. 1998; 36: 744-749
        • Dobkin B.
        • Apple D.
        • Barbeau H.
        • et al.
        • Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial Group
        Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI.
        Neurology. 2006; 66: 484-493
      8. Key reference.
        • Field-Fote E.C.
        • Lindley S.D.
        • Sherman A.L.
        Locomotor training approaches for individuals with spinal cord injury: a preliminary report of walking-related outcomes.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005; 29: 127-137



      1. Elge, 1000 Cole, Rosenberg, TX 77471.

      2. Independence Technology, PO Box 7338, Endicott, NY 13760.

      3. Hocoma AG, Industriestr 4, CH-8604 Volketswil, Zurich, Switzerland.

      4. Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, 100 Foxborough Blvd, Ste 240, Foxborough, MA 02035.