Objective: To evaluate the effects of early versus delayed environmental enrichment on motor
and cognitive function after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: Experimental research laboratory. Animals: 30 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Interventions: Anesthetized rats received a cortical impact or sham injury and then were randomly
assigned to either early or delayed environmental enrichment. Early environmental
enrichment consisted of housing rats (n=10 per cage) in a large 3-level cage with
multiple sensory stimuli immediately after surgery for 1 week and then transferring
them to standard conditions (n=2 per cage) for the remainder of the study (ie, 12d).
Delayed environmental enrichment consisted of placing rats in a standard environment
after surgery for 1 week and then transferring them to an environmental enrichment.
Function was assessed by established motor (beam balance, walk) and cognitive (spatial
learning, memory) tests on postoperative days 1 through 5 and 14 through 18, respectively.
Main Outcome Measures: Latency (in seconds) to maintain beam balance, traverse a narrow elevated beam, and
to locate a submerged platform in a Morris water maze. Results: No significant differences in any task or condition were observed between sham controls.
In TBI, early environmental enrichment facilitated beam walking versus delayed (P=.000), but did not affect beam balance (P=.953). This finding may be explained by increased locomotor opportunity afforded
to rats in larger cages versus the minimal experience in standard cages. In marked
contrast, early environmental enrichment yielded worse water maze performance than
delayed environmental enrichment (P<.001). Explanations for this finding are more complex and may include an attenuation
of early environmental enrichment benefits, necessity of environmental enrichment
during the task, or more days of enrichment in the delayed paradigm. Conclusions: These data suggest that environmental enrichment as a therapeutic strategy after
TBI provides significant benefit, but is more complicated than previously thought
and requires further investigation.
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Footnotes
Disclosure: None.
Identification
Copyright
© 2006 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.