Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion Scales: Do the Verbal Anchors Mean the Same for Different Clinical Groups?


      Dawes HN, Barker KL, Cockburn J, Roach N, Scott O, Wade D. Borg’s rating of perceived exertion scales: do the verbal anchors mean the same for different clinical groups?


      To examine the interpretation of the verbal anchors used in the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scales in different clinical groups and a healthy control group.


      Prospective experimental study.


      Rehabilitation center.


      Nineteen subjects with brain injury, 16 with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and 20 healthy controls.


      Not applicable.

      Main outcome measures

      Subjects used a visual analog scale (VAS) to rate their interpretation of the verbal anchors from the Borg RPE 6–20 and the newer 10-point category ratio scale.


      All groups placed the verbal anchors in the order that they occur on the scales. There were significant within-group differences (P>.05) between VAS scores for 4 verbal anchors in the control group, 8 in the CLBP group, and 2 in the brain injury group. There was no significant difference in rating of each verbal anchor between the groups (P>.05).


      All subjects rated the verbal anchors in the order they occur on the scales, but there was less agreement in rating of each verbal anchor among subjects in the brain injury group. Clinicians should consider the possibility of small discrepancies in the meaning of the verbal anchors to subjects, particularly those recovering from brain injury, when they evaluate exercise perceptions.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Barker K.L.
        • Dawes H.
        • Hansford P.
        • Shamley D.
        Perceived and measured levels of exertion of patients with chronic back pain exercising in a hydrotherapy pool.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1319-1323
        • Bateman A.
        • Culpan F.J.
        • Pickering A.D.
        • Powell J.H.
        • Scott O.M.
        • Greenwood R.J.
        The effect of aerobic training on rehabilitation outcomes after recent severe brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 174-182
        • American College of Sports Medicine
        Guidelines for graded exercise testing and training. 5th ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia1995
        • Hamilton A.L.
        • Killian K.J.
        • Summers E.
        • Jones N.
        Quantification of intensity of sensations during muscular work by normal subjects.
        J Appl Physiol. 1996; 81: 1156-1161
        • Kinsman R.A.
        • Weiser P.C.
        Subjective symptomatology during work and fatigue.
        in: Simonson E. Weiser P. Psychological aspects and physiological correlates of work and fatigue. CC Thomas, Springfield1975: 336-405
        • Weiser P.C.
        • Stamper D.A.
        Psychophysiological interactions leading to increased effort, leg fatigue, and respiratory distress during prolonged strenuous bicycle riding.
        in: Borg G. Physical work and effort. Pergamon Pr, Oxford1977: 410-416
        • Laming D.
        The measurement of sensation. Oxford Univ Pr, Oxford1997: 87-106
        • Borg G.
        • Hassmen P.
        • Lagerstrom M.
        Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987; 65: 679-685
        • Borg G.
        Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign1998
        • Borg G.
        Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970; 2: 92-98
        • Borg G.
        • Lindblad I.
        The determination of subjective intensities in verbal descriptions of symptoms. Reports from the Institute of Applied Psychology. Univ Stockholm, Stockholm1976: 75
        • Borg G.
        A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons.
        in: Geissler H. Petzold P. Psychophysical judgement and the process of perception. VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin1982: 25-34
        • Borg G.
        • Ljunggren G.
        • Ceci R.
        The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer.
        Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985; 54: 343-349
        • Mosier C.I.
        A psychometric study of meaning.
        J Soc Psychol. 1941; 13: 123-140
        • Cliff N.
        Adverbs as multipliers.
        Psychol Rev. 1959; 66: 27-44
        • Stephens D.E.
        • Janz K.F.
        • Mahoney L.T.
        Goal orientation and ratings of perceived exertion in graded exercise testing of adolescents.
        Percept Mot Skills. 2000; 90: 813-822
        • Swensen T.C.
        • Harnish C.R.
        • Beitman L.
        • Keller B.A.
        Noninvasive estimation of maximal lactate steady state in trained cyclists.
        Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1999; 31: 742-746
        • Sparrow W.A.
        • Hughes K.M.
        • Russell A.P.
        • Le Rossignol P.F.
        Effects of practice and preferred rate on perceived exertion, metabolic variables and movement control.
        Hum Mov Sci. 1999; 8: 137-153
        • Clinical Standards Advisory Group
        Report on low back pain. HMSO, London1994
        • Sports Council, Health Education Authority
        Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey.
        SC, HEA, Northampton1992
        • Wade D.T.
        • Vergis E.
        The short orientation memory concentration test. A study of its reliability and validity.
        Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13: 164-170
        • Katzman R.
        • Brown T.
        • Fuld P.
        • Peck A.
        • Schechter R.
        • Schimmel H.
        Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment.
        Am J Psychiatry. 1983; 140: 734-739
        • Enderby P.M.
        • Wood V.A.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Hewer R.L.
        The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test.
        Int Rehabil Med. 1986; 8: 166-170
        • Collin C.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Davies S.
        • Horne V.
        The Barthel ADL Index.
        Int Disabil Stud. 1988; 10: 61-63
        • Wade D.T.
        Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford Univ Pr, Oxford1992: 170-171
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Schemitsch E.
        Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function.
        Clin Orthop. 2003; Aug: 90-105
        • Dawes H.
        • Cockburn J.
        • Roach N.K.
        • Wade D.T.
        • Bateman A.
        • Scott O.
        The effect of a perceptual cognitive task on the exercise performance.
        Clin Rehabil. 2003; 17: 535-539
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; i: 307-310