Impairment and Partial Recovery of Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study


      Marson DC, Dreer LE, Krzywanski S, Huthwaite JS, DeVivo MJ, Novack TA. Impairment and partial recovery of medical decision-making capacity in traumatic brain injury: a 6-month longitudinal study.


      To investigate empirically change in medical decision-making capacity (MDC) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).


      Longitudinal study comparing control and TBI groups at hospitalization and at 6 months postinjury.


      Inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit.


      Twenty healthy controls and 24 patients with moderate to severe TBI.


      Not applicable.

      Main outcome measures

      MDC was measured by using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI). The CCTI evaluates performance on a series of 4 accepted consent abilities, or standards: S1 (evidencing/communicating choice), S3 (appreciating consequences), S4 (reasoning about treatment), and S5 (understanding the treatment situation and choices), and 1 experimental standard [S2] (making the reasonable treatment choice when the alternative choice is unreasonable). In addition, TBI patients were assigned 1 of 3 capacity outcomes (capable, marginally capable, incapable) for each standard.


      At hospitalization, TBI patients performed equivalently with controls on standards S1 and [S2] but significantly below controls on S3 (P<.001), S4 (P<.02), and S5 (P<.001). At 6-month follow-up, TBI patients showed significant within-group improvement on these 3 standards (S3, S4, S5) but continued to fall significantly below controls on S3 (P<.006) and S5 (P<.001). A group by time interaction emerged on S5 (P<.02). The TBI group showed increasing proportions of capable outcomes on all standards over the 6 months.


      Patients with TBI showed initial impairment and subsequent partial recovery of MDC over a 6-month period. Complex consent abilities of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding were significantly impaired in hospitalized acute TBI patients. At follow-up, TBI patients showed substantial recovery of reasoning and partial recovery of appreciation and understanding consent abilities. The study suggests the importance in the rehabilitation setting of serial evaluations of MDC in patients with TBI.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Banja J.
        Proxy consent to medical treatment.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67: 790-792
        • Simon R.
        Ethical and legal issues.
        in: Silver J. Yudofsky S. Hales R. Neuropsychiatry of traumatic brain injury. Am Psychiatric Assoc, Washington (DC)1994: 569-627
        • Wong T.
        Ethical issues in the evaluation of treatment of traumatic brain injury avoiding ethical misconduct in psychology specialty areas. CC Thomas, Springfield1998: 187-200
        • Wong J.
        • Clare C.
        • Gunn M.
        • Holland A.
        Capacity to make health care decisions.
        Psychol Med. 1999; 29: 437-446
        • Bamdad M.
        • Ryan L.
        • Warden D.
        Functional assessment of executive abilities following traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2003; 17: 1011-1020
        • Dijkers M.
        Quality of life after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: S21-S35
        • Dikmen S.
        • Ross B.
        • Machamer J.
        • Temkin N.
        One year psychosocial outcome in head injury.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995; 1: 66-77
        • Dikmen S.
        • Machamer J.
        • Powell J.
        • Temkin N.
        Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1449-1457
        • Fann J.
        • Katon W.
        • Uomoto J.
        • Esselman P.C.
        Psychiatric disorders and functional disability in outpatients with traumatic brain injuries.
        Am J Psychiatry. 1995; 152: 1493-1499
        • Fisher S.
        • Trexler L.
        • Gauggel S.
        Awareness of activity limitations and prediction of performance in patients with brain injuries and orthopedic disorders.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10: 190-199
        • Flemming J.
        • Strong J.
        • Ashton R.
        Self-awareness of deficits in adults with traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 1996; 10: 1-15
        • Gray D.
        Slow-to-recover severe traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2000; 14: 1003-1014
        • Hillier S.
        • Sharpe M.
        • Metzer J.
        Outcomes 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability).
        Brain Inj. 1997; 11: 661-675
        • Kersel D.
        • Marsh N.
        • Havill J.
        • Sleighs J.
        Psychosocial functioning during year following severe traumatic brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2001; 15: 683-696
        • Oddy M.
        Head injury and social adjustment.
        in: Brooks N. Closed head injury psychological, social, and family consequences. Oxford Univ Pr, New York1984: 108-122
        • Thomsen I.
        Late psychosocial outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. Preliminary results of a third follow-up after 20 years.
        Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1992; 26: 142-152
        • Ylvisaker M.
        • Feeney T.
        Executive functions after traumatic brain injury.
        Semin Speech Lang. 1996; 17: 217-232
        • Marson D.C.
        • Ingram K.K.
        • Cody H.A.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards.
        Arch Neurol. 1995; 52: 949-954
        • Marson D.C.
        • Hawkins L.
        • McInturff B.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 458-464
        • Kapp M.
        Geriatrics and the law. Springer, New York1992
        • Grisso T.
        Evaluating competencies. Plenum Pr, New York1986
        • Tepper A.
        • Elwork A.
        Competency to consent to treatment as a psychological construct.
        Law Hum Behav. 1984; 8: 205-223
        • Appelbaum P.
        • Grisso T.
        Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 1635-1638
        • Grisso T.
        • Appelbaum P.
        • Mulvey E.
        • Fletcher K.
        The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment.
        Law Hum Behav. 1995; 19: 127-148
        • Dymek M.P.
        • Marson D.C.
        • Harrell L.
        Factor structure of capacity to consent to medical treatment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Forensic Neuropsychol. 1999; 1: 27-48
        • Marson D.C.
        • Cody H.A.
        • Ingram K.K.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Neuropsychologic predictors of competency in Alzheimer’s disease using a rational reasons legal standard.
        Arch Neurol. 1995; 52: 955-959
        • Marson D.C.
        • Chatterjee A.
        • Ingram K.K.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Toward a neurologic model of competency.
        Neurology. 1996; 46: 666-672
        • Earnst K.
        • Marson D.
        • Harrell L.
        Cognitive models of physicians’ legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 919-927
        • Rosenthal M.
        • Ricker J.
        Traumatic brain injury.
        in: Frank R. Elliott T. Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Am Psychol Assoc, Washington (DC)2000: 49-74
        • Marson D.
        • Strickland A.
        • Hethcox A.
        • et al.
        Assessing competency to consent to treatment in traumatic brain injury [abstract].
        Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001; 16: 754
        • Reid-Proctor G.M.
        • Galin K.
        • Cummings M.A.
        Evaluation of legal competency of patients with frontal lobe injury.
        Brain Injury. 2001; 15: 377-386
        • Dymek M.
        • Atchison P.
        • Harrell L.
        • Marson D.
        Competency to consent to treatment in cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson’s disease.
        Neurology. 2001; 56: 17-24
        • Marson D.
        • Annis S.
        • McInturff B.
        • Bartolucci A.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Error behaviors associated with loss of competency in Alzheimer’s disease.
        Neurology. 1999; 53: 1983-1992
        • Marson D.
        • Sawrie S.
        • Snyder S.
        • et al.
        Assessing financial capacity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        Arch Neurol. 2000; 57: 877-884
        • Marson D.
        • Earnst K.
        • Jamil F.
        • Bartolucci A.
        • Harrell L.
        Consistency of physicians’ legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 911-918
        • Marson D.C.
        • McInturff B.
        • Hawkins L.
        • Bartolucci A.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45: 453-457
        • Teasdale G.
        • Jennett B.
        Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness.
        Lancet. 1974; 2: 81-84
        • Marson D.
        • Briggs S.
        Assessing competency in Alzheimer’s disease.
        in: Gauthier S. Cummings J.L. Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders annual 2001. Martin Dunitz, London2001: 165-192
        • Roth L.
        • Meisel A.
        • Lidz C.
        Tests of competency to consent to treatment.
        Am J Psychiatry. 1977; 134: 279-284
        • Grisso T.
        • Appelbaum P.
        A comparison of standards for assessing patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions.
        Am J Psychiatry. 1995; 19: 149-166
        • Griffith H.
        • Belue K.
        • Sicola A.
        • et al.
        Impaired financial abilities in mild cognitive impairment.
        Neurology. 2003; 60: 449-457
        • McNemar Q.
        Psychological statistics. 5th ed. Wiley, New York1975
        • SPSS Inc.
        SPSS base 10.0 applications guide. SPSS, Chicago2000
        • Center for Disease Control and Prevention
        Traumatic brain injury—Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Utah, 1990–1993.
        MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 1997; 48: 8-11
        • Levin H.
        • O’Donnell V.
        • Grossman R.
        The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test.
        J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979; 20: 694-705
        • Johnson R.
        • Balleny H.
        Behaviour problems after brain injury.
        Clin Rehabil. 1996; 10: 173-181
        • Leathem J.
        • Murphy L.
        • Flett R.
        Self and informant ratings on the Patient Competency Rating Scale in patients with traumatic brain injury.
        J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998; 20: 694-705
        • Oddy M.
        • Humphrey M.
        • Uttley D.
        Subjective impairment and social recovery after closed head injury.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978; 41: 611-616
        • Stuss D.
        • Benson D.
        The frontal lobes. Raven Pr, New York1986
        • Christensen K.
        • Haroun A.
        • Schneiderman L.
        • Jeste D.
        Decision-making capacity for informed consent in the older population.
        Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995; 18: 221-238
        • Fitten L.J.
        • Waite M.S.
        Impact of medical hospitalization on treatment decision-making capacity in the elderly.
        Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150: 1717-1721
        • Marson D.C.
        • Schmitt F.
        • Ingram K.K.
        • Harrell L.E.
        Determining the competency of Alzheimer’s patients to consent to treatment and research.
        Alzheimers Dis Assoc Disord. 1994; 8: 5-18