Reproducibility of walking at self-preferred and maximal speed in patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome


      Horemans HL, Beelen A, Nollet F, Lankhorst GJ. Reproducibility of walking at self-preferred and maximal speed in patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome.


      To assess the reproducibility of walking performance, heart rate, and perceived exertion at self-preferred speed and maximal walking speed in patients with the postpoliomyelitis syndrome (PPS).


      Repeated measurement at a 3-week interval.


      University hospital.


      Convenience sample of 65 patients with PPS.


      Not applicable.

      Main outcome measures

      Walking performance: the distance walked in 2 minutes at a self-preferred speed and the time needed to walk 75m at maximal speed, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) on an 11-point scale.


      Test-retest reliability of walking performance was excellent for both tests (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .94–.97). No systematic differences existed between test and retest. The smallest detectable change for an individual was 15% for both tests. Test-retest reliability for heart rate was good (ICC=.86) but moderate for RPE (Spearman ρ range, .67–.70). The smallest detectable change for RPE was between 4 and 6 scale points. The variability in walking performance was significantly correlated with the variability in heart rate at self-preferred speed (r=.36, P<.01) but not with the variability in RPE (r=.20, P=.11).


      Both walking tests showed good reproducibility and may be appropriate to monitor (individual) changes in walking capacity in patients with PPS. Because of its moderate reproducibility, RPE does not seem to be suitable to monitor physical exertion. The usefulness of an objective measure such as heart rate for this purpose needs further investigation.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Lonnberg F.
        Late onset polio sequelae in Denmark. Results of a nationwide survey of 3,607 polio survivors.
        Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1993; 28: 1-32
        • Ramlow J.
        • Alexander M.
        • LaPorte R.
        • Kaufmann C.
        • Kuller L.
        Epidemiology of the post-polio syndrome.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 136: 769-786
        • Ivanyi B.
        • Nollet F.
        • Redekop W.K.
        • et al.
        Late onset polio sequelae.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 687-690
        • Westbrook M.T.
        A survey of post-poliomyelitis sequelae.
        Aust J Physiother. 1991; 37: 89-102
        • Nollet F.
        • Beelen A.
        • Prins M.H.
        • et al.
        Disability and functional assessment in former polio patients with and without postpolio syndrome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 136-143
        • Burger H.
        • Marincek C.
        The influence of post-polio syndrome on independence and life satisfaction.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2000; 22: 318-322
        • Willen C.
        • Cider A.
        • Sunnerhagen K.S.
        Physical performance in individuals with late effects of polio.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999; 31: 244-249
        • Thoren-Jonsson A.L.
        • Grimby G.
        Ability and perceived difficulty in daily activities in people with poliomyelitis sequelae.
        J Rehabil Med. 2001; 33: 4-11
        • Butland R.J.
        • Pang J.
        • Gross E.R.
        • Woodcock A.A.
        • Geddes D.M.
        Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease.
        Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 284: 1607-1608
        • Pinna D.G.
        • Opasich C.
        • Mazza A.
        • Tangenti A.
        • Maestri R.
        • Sanarico M.
        Reproducibility of the six-minute walking test in chronic heart failure patients.
        Stat Med. 2000; 19: 3087-3094
        • Rossier P.
        • Wade D.T.
        Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 9-13
        • Agre J.C.
        • Rodriquez A.A.
        • Franke T.M.
        • Swiggum E.R.
        • Harmon R.L.
        • Curt J.T.
        Low-intensity, alternate-day exercise improves muscle performance without apparent adverse effect in postpolio patients.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 75: 50-58
        • Borg G.A.
        Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.
        Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970; 2: 92-98
      1. March of Dimes. Post-polio syndrome. identifying best practices in diagnosis and care. March of Dimes, White Plains2001
        • Russell W.D.
        On the current status of rated perceived exertion.
        Percept Mot Skills. 1997; 84: 799-808
        • Whaley M.H.
        • Brubaker P.H.
        • Kaminsky L.A.
        • Miller C.R.
        Validity of rating of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults and cardiac patients.
        J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1997; 17: 261-267
        • Halstead L.S.
        Post-polio syndrome.
        in: Munsat T.L. Post-polio syndrome. Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham1991: 23-38
        • Halstead L.S.
        • Silver J.K.
        Nonparalytic polio and postpolio syndrome.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 79: 13-18
        • Borg K.
        Post-polio muscle dysfunction.
        Neuromuscul Disord. 1996; 6: 75-80
        • Rankin G.
        • Stokes M.
        Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation.
        Clin Rehabil. 1998; 12: 187-199
        • Fleiss J.
        Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed, 10th print ed. Wiley, New York1988
        • Lee J.
        • Koh D.
        • Ong C.N.
        Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.
        Comput Biol Med. 1989; 19: 61-70
        • Bland J.M.
        • Altman D.G.
        Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
        Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310
        • Morris M.E.
        • Cantwell C.
        • Vowels L.
        • Dodd K.
        Changes in gait and fatigue from morning to afternoon in people with multiple sclerosis.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 72: 361-365
        • Connelly D.M.
        • Stevenson T.J.
        • Vandervoort A.A.
        Between- and within-rater reliability of walking tests in a frail elderly population.
        Physiother Can. 1996; 48: 47-51
        • Green J.
        • Forster A.
        • Young J.
        Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 306-314
        • Fransen M.
        • Crosbie J.
        • Edmonds J.
        Reliability of gait measurements in people with osteoarthritis of the knee.
        Phys Ther. 1997; 77: 944-953
        • Knox A.J.
        • Morrison J.F.
        • Muers M.F.
        Reproducibility of walking test results in chronic obstructive airways disease.
        Thorax. 1988; 43: 388-392
        • Nollet F.
        • Beelen A.
        Strength assessment in postpolio syndrome.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1316-1323
        • Grant S.
        • McMillan K.
        • Newell J.
        • et al.
        Reproducibility of the blood lactate threshold, 4 mmol.l(-1) marker, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion during incremental treadmill exercise in humans.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002; 87: 159-166
        • Lamb K.L.
        • Eston R.G.
        • Corns D.
        Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise.
        Br J Sports Med. 1999; 33: 336-339
        • Buckley J.P.
        • Eston R.G.
        • Sim J.
        Ratings of perceived exertion in braille.
        Br J Sports Med. 2000; 34: 297-302
        • Mercer T.H.
        Reproducibility of blood lactate-anchored ratings of perceived exertion.
        Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 85: 496-499
        • Rodriquez A.A.
        • Agre J.C.
        Physiologic parameters and perceived exertion with local muscle fatigue in postpolio subjects.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72: 305-308
        • Borg G.
        Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign1998
        • Chen M.J.
        • Fan X.
        • Moe S.T.
        Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals.
        J Sports Sci. 2002; 20: 873-899