Advertisement

The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility1

      Abstract

      Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.

      Objective

      To determine the measurement properties and diagnostic utility of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

      Design

      Analysis of interrater and test-retest reliability, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy.

      Setting

      Acute inpatient brain injury rehabilitation hospital.

      Participants

      Convenience sample of 80 patients with severe acquired brain injury admitted to an inpatient Coma Intervention Program with a diagnosis of either vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main outcome measures

      The CRS-R, the JFK Coma Recovery Scale (CRS), and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS).

      Results

      Interrater and test-retest reliability were high for CRS-R total scores. Subscale analysis showed moderate to high interrater and test-retest agreement although systematic differences in scoring were noted on the visual and oromotor/verbal subscales. CRS-R total scores correlated significantly with total scores on the CRS and DRS indicating acceptable concurrent validity. The CRS-R was able to distinguish 10 patients in an MCS who were otherwise misclassified as in a VS by the DRS.

      Conclusions

      The CRS-R can be administered reliably by trained examiners and repeated measurements yield stable estimates of patient status. CRS-R subscale scores demonstrated good agreement across raters and ratings but should be used cautiously because some scores were underrepresented in the current study. The CRS-R appears capable of differentiating patients in an MCS from those in a VS.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Plum F.
        • Posner J.
        The diagnosis of stupor and coma. 3rd ed. FA Davis, Philadelphia1982
      1. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). Multi-Society Task Force Report on PVS [see comments].
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1499-1508
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Ashwal S.
        • Childs N.
        • et al.
        The minimally conscious state.
        Neurology. 2002; 58: 349-353
        • Ansell B.J.
        • Keenan J.E.
        The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70: 104-108
        • Rader M.A.
        • Alston J.B.
        • Ellis D.W.
        Sensory stimulation of severely brain-injured patients.
        Brain Inj. 1989; 3: 141-147
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Kezmarsky M.A.
        • DeLuca J.
        • Cicerone K.D.
        Monitoring rate of recovery to predict outcome in minimally responsive patients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 72: 897-901
        • Rappaport M.
        • Dougherty A.M.
        • Kelting D.L.
        Evaluation of coma and vegetative states.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: 628-634
        • Teasdale G.
        • Jennett B.
        Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.
        Lancet. 1974; 2: 81-84
        • Hagan C.
        • Malkmus D.
        • Durham P.
        Levels of cognitive function.
        Rehabilitation of the head injured adult. Professional Staff Association, Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Downey (CA)1979
        • O’Dell M.W.
        • Jasin P.
        • Lyons N.
        • Stivers M.
        • Meszaro F.
        Standardized assessment instruments for minimally-responsive, brain-injured patients.
        NeuroRehabil. 1996; 6: 45-55
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Kalmar K.
        • Chase R.F.
        The JFK Coma Recovery Scale.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 662
        • O’Dell M.W.
        • Jasin P.
        • Stivers M.
        • Lyons N.
        • Schmidt S.
        • Moore D.E.
        Interrater reliability of the Coma Recovery Scale.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996; 11: 61-66
        • Rappaport M.
        • Hall K.M.
        • Hopkins K.
        • Belleza T.
        • Cope D.N.
        Disability rating scale for severe head trauma.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982; 63: 118-123
        • Giacino J.T.
        • Kalmar K.
        The vegetative and minimally conscious states.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997; 12: 36-51
        • Thompson N.
        • Sherer M.
        • Nick T.
        • et al.
        Predicting change in functional outcomes in minimally responsive patients using the Coma Recovery Scale [abstract].
        Arch Clin Neuropsyhol. 1999; 14: 790-791
        • Hamilton B.B.
        • Granger C.V.
        • Sherwin F.S.
        • Zielezny M.
        • Tashman J.S.
        A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation.
        in: Fuhrer M.J. Rehabilitation outcomes analysis and measurement. Brookes, Baltimore1987: 137-147
        • Kalmar K.
        • Giacino J.
        The JFK Coma Recovery Scale: an ordinal or interval measure? [abstract].
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 1619
        • Wright B.D.
        • Masters G.
        Rating scale analysis. Mesa Pr, Chicago1982
        • Johnston M.V.
        • Keith R.A.
        • Hinderer S.R.
        Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: S3-S23
        • Hall K.
        • Cope D.N.
        • Rappaport M.
        Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985; 66: 35-37
        • Gouvier W.D.
        • Blanton P.D.
        • LaPorte K.K.
        • Nepomuceno C.
        Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987; 68: 94-97
        • Hall K.M.
        • Johnston M.V.
        Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. Part II: measurement tools for a nationwide data system.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75 (discussion SC27-8): SC10, SC18
        • Whyte J.
        • DiPasquale M.C.
        Assessment of vision and visual attention in minimally responsive brain injured patients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 804-810
        • Whyte J.
        • DiPasquale M.C.
        • Vaccaro M.
        Assessment of command-following in minimally conscious brain injured patients.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 653-660
        • Whyte J.
        • Laborde A.
        • DiPasquale M.C.
        Assessment and treatment of the vegetative and minimally conscious patient.
        in: Rosenthal M. Griffith E.R. Kreutzer J. Pentland B. Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury. 3rd ed. FA Davis, Philadelphia1999: 435-452
        • Tresch D.D.
        • Sims F.H.
        • Duthie E.H.
        • Goldstein M.D.
        • Lane P.S.
        Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991; 151: 930-932
        • Childs N.L.
        • Mercer W.N.
        • Childs H.W.
        Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state.
        Neurology. 1993; 43: 1465-1467
        • Andrews K.
        • Murphy L.
        • Munday R.
        • Littlewood C.
        Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state.
        BMJ. 1996; 313: 13-16