Advertisement
Articles| Volume 85, ISSUE 12, P1977-1981, December 2004

The effects of pilates training on flexibility and body composition: An observational study1

      Abstract

      Segal NA, Hein J, Basford JR. The effects of Pilates training on flexibility and body composition: an observational study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1977–81.

      Objective

      To assess claims regarding the effects of Pilates training on flexibility, body composition, and health status.

      Design

      An observational prospective study.

      Setting

      A community athletic club.

      Participants

      A sample of 47 adults (45 women, 2 men) who presented for Pilates training.

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main outcome measures

      Fingertip-to-floor distance, truncal lean body mass by bioelectric impedance, health status by questionnaire and visual analog scale were assessed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months (±1wk).

      Results

      Thirty-two of 47 enrolled subjects met the protocol requirements of missing no more than 1 weekly 1-hour session Pilates mat class during each 2-month period. Investigators were blinded to measurements from previous time points. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) fingertip-to-floor distance improved from baseline by 3.4cm (1.3–5.7cm), 3.3cm (0.3– 7.8cm), and 4.3cm (1.5–7.6cm) at 2, 4, and 6 months, respectively (paired nonparametric analysis, all P<.01). There were no statistically significant changes in truncal lean body mass, height, weight, or other body composition parameters. Self-assessment of health also did not change in a statistically significant manner from its baseline median (IQR) value of 77mm (69–85mm).

      Conclusions

      Pilates training may result in improved flexibility. However, its effects on body composition, health status, and posture are more limited and may be difficult to establish. Further study might involve larger sample sizes, comparison with an appropriate control group, and assessment of motor unit recruitment as well as strength of truncal stabilizers.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • World Health Organization
        WHO definition of health. 2001 (Available at: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en. Accessed March 16)
        • Chang Y.
        Grace under pressure. Ten years ago, 5,000 people did the exercise routine called Pilates. The number now is 5 million in America alone. But what is it, exactly?.
        Newsweek. 2000; 135: 72-73
        • Merrithew Corporation
        FAQ answers to some of the most commonly asked questions. 2001 (Available at: http://www.stottpilates.com/faq.html. Accessed February 19, 2004)
        • Anderson B.
        Introduction to Pilates-based rehabilitation.
        Orthop Phys Ther Clin North Am. 2000; 9: 395-410
      1. Jurvelin J, Kiviranta I, Tammi M, Helminen JH. Softening of canine articular cartilage after immobilization of the knee joint. Clin Orthop 1986;Jun(207):246–52.

        • Merrithew Corporation
        What are the benefits of Stott Pilates?2001 (Available at: www.stottpilates.com. Accessed February 19, 2004)
      2. Stott Pilates comprehensive matwork manual. Lindsay G. Merrithew, Toronto2001
        • Perret C.
        • Poiraudeau S.
        • Fermanian J.
        • Colau M.M.
        • Benhamou M.A.
        • Revel M.
        Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the fingertip-to-floor test.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1566-1570
        • Utter A.C.
        • Nieman D.C.
        • Ward A.N.
        • Butterworth D.E.
        Use of the leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance method in assessing body-composition change in obese women.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1999; 69: 603-607
        • Lukaski H.C.
        Assessing regional muscle mass with segmental measurements of bioelectrical impedance in obese women during weight loss.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 904: 154-158
        • Cha K.
        • Shin S.
        • Shon C.
        • Choi S.
        • Wilmore D.
        Evaluation of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (SBIA) for measuring muscle distribution. J ICHPER SD-ASIA, 1997 (p 11–4)
        • Pace N.
        • Rathburn E.
        Studies on body composition. III. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content.
        J Biol Chem. 1945; 158: 685-691
        • Pfeifer B.
        • Daltroy L.
        Report of the validity, reliability and sensitivity testing of the MODEMS lumbar, cervical and scoliosis spine outcomes questionnaire. Paper presented to: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, New Orleans (LA)1998 (March 19; Paper No. 047)
        • Daltroy L.H.
        • Cats-Baril W.L.
        • Katz J.N.
        • Fossel A.H.
        • Liang M.H.
        The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 741-749
        • Miller M.H.
        • Lee P.
        • Smythe H.A.
        • Goldsmith C.H.
        Measurements of spinal mobility in the sagittal plane.
        J Rheumatol. 1984; 11: 507-511
        • Friedrich M.
        • Gittler G.
        • Halberstadt Y.
        • Cermak T.
        • Heiller I.
        Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 475-487
      3. Physical activity and health. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta1996
        • Segal K.R.
        • Van Loan M.
        • Fitzgerald P.I.
        • Hodgdon J.A.
        • Van Itallie T.B.
        Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1988; 47: 7-14
        • Kendall F.
        • McCreary E.
        • Provance P.
        Muscles, testing and function. 4th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1993