Advertisement

Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury1

      Abstract

      Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:943–50.

      Objective

      To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive cognitive rehabilitation program (ICRP) compared with standard neurorehabilitation (SRP) for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

      Design

      Nonrandomized controlled intervention trial.

      Setting

      Community-based, postacute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation program.

      Participants

      Fifty-six persons with TBI.

      Interventions

      Participants in ICRP (n=27) received an intensive, highly structured program of integrated cognitive and psychosocial interventions based on principles of holistic neuropsychologic rehabilitation. Participants in SRP (n=29) received comprehensive neurorehabilitation consisting primarily of physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychologic treatment. Duration of treatment was approximately 4 months for both interventions.

      Main outcome measures

      Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); and Quality of Community Integration Questionnaire assessing satisfaction with community functioning and satisfaction with cognitive functioning. Neuropsychologic functioning was evaluated for the ICRP participants.

      Results

      Both groups showed significant improvement on the CIQ, with the ICRP group exhibiting a significant treatment effect compared with the SRP group. Analysis of clinically significant improvement indicated that ICRP participants were over twice as likely to show clinical benefit on the CIQ (odds ratio=2.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.8–7.2). ICRP participants showed significant improvement in overall neuropsychologic functioning; participants with clinically significant improvement on the CIQ also showed greater improvement of neuropsychologic functioning. Satisfaction with community functioning was not related to community integration after treatment. Satisfaction with cognitive functioning made a significant contribution to posttreatment community integration; this finding may reflect the mediating effects of perceived self-efficacy on functional outcome.

      Conclusions

      Intensive, holistic, cognitive rehabilitation is an effective form of rehabilitation, particularly for persons with TBI who have previously been unable to resume community functioning. Perceived self-efficacy may have significant impact on functional outcomes after TBI rehabilitation. Measures of social participation and subjective well-being appear to represent distinct and separable rehabilitation outcomes after TBI.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Malec J.F
        • Basford J.S
        Post-acute brain injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 198-207
        • Malec J.F
        • Smigielski J.S
        • DePompolo R.W
        • Thompson J.M
        Outcome evaluation and prediction in a comprehensive-integrated post-acute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation programme.
        Brain Inj. 1993; 7: 15-29
        • Ben-Yishay Y
        • Gold J
        Therapeutic milieu approach to neuropsychological rehabilitation.
        in: Woods R.L Neurobehavioral sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Taylor & Francis, New York1990: 194-218
        • Rattok J
        • Ben-Yishay Y
        • Ezrachi O
        • et al.
        Outcome of different treatment mixes in a multidimensional neuropsychological rehabilitation program.
        Neuropsychology. 1992; 6: 395-415
        • Cicerone K.D
        • Dahlberg C
        • Kalmar K
        • et al.
        Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 1596-1615
        • Malec J.F
        Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 885-895
        • Sander A.M
        • Roebuck T.M
        • Struchen M
        • Sherer M
        • High W.M
        Long-term maintenance of gains obtained in postacute rehabilitation by persons with traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001; 16: 356-373
        • Seale G.S
        • Caroselli J.S
        • High W.M
        • Becker C.L
        • Neese L.E
        • Scheibel R
        Use of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) to characterize changes in functioning for individuals with traumatic brain injury who participated in a post-acute brain injury rehabilitation programme.
        Brain Inj. 2002; 16: 955-967
        • Willer B
        • Rosenthal M
        • Kreutzer J.S
        • Gordon W.A
        • Rempel R
        Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993; 8: 75-87
        • Dijkers M
        Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997; 12: 74-91
        • Webb C.R
        • Wrigley M
        • Yoels W
        • Fine P.R
        Explaining quality of life for persons with traumatic brain injuries 2 years after injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76: 1113-1119
        • Corrigan J.D
        • Smith-Knapp K
        • Granger C.V
        Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 298-305
        • Corrigan J.D
        • Bogner J.A
        • Mysiw W.J
        • Clinchot D
        • Fugate L
        Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001; 16: 543-555
        • Bezner J.R
        • Hunter D.L
        Wellness perception in persons with traumatic brain injury and its relation to functional independence.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 787-792
        • Koskinen S
        Quality of life 10 years after a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
        Brain Inj. 1998; 12: 631-648
        • Schalen W
        • Hansson L
        • Nordstom G
        • Nordstrom C.H
        Psychosocial outcome 5–8 years after severe traumatic brain lesions and the impact of rehabilitation services.
        Brain Inj. 1994; 8: 49-64
        • Steadman-Pare D
        • Colantonio A
        • Ratcliff G
        • Chase S
        • Vernich L
        Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001; 16: 330-342
        • Azouvi P
        • Mailhan L
        • Truelle J.L
        • Dazor A
        Quality of life 2 to 6 years after a severe traumatic brain injury. 2001 (Paper presented at: The 4th World Congress on Brain Injury: May 5–9; Turin, Italy)
        • Heinemann A.W
        • Whiteneck G.G
        Relationships among impairment, disability, handicap and life satisfaction in persons with traumatic brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995; 10: 54-63
        • Burleigh S.A
        • Farber R.S
        • Gillard M
        Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1998; 52: 45-52
        • Smith J.L
        • Magill-Evans J
        • Brintnell A
        Life satisfaction following traumatic brain injury.
        Can J Rehabil. 1998; 11: 131-140
        • Bergquist T
        • Boll T.J
        • Corrigan J.D
        • et al.
        Neuropsychological rehabilitation.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1994; 9: 50-61
        • Zakzanis K.K
        Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
        Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001; 16: 653-667
        • Jacobson N.S
        • Truax P
        Clinical significance.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991; 59: 12-19
        • Bullinger M
        • Azouvi P
        • Brooks N
        • et al.
        Quality of life in participants with traumatic brain injury—basic issues, assessment and recommendations.
        Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002; 20: 111-124
        • Johnston M.V
        • Miklos C.S
        Activity-related quality of life in rehabilitation and traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 26-38
        • Heaton R.K
        • Grant I
        • Matthews C.G
        Comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (FL)1991
        • Delis D.C
        • Kramer J.H
        • Kaplan E
        • Ober B.A
        California Verbal Learning Test, research edition. Psychological Corp, New York1987
        • Meyers J.F
        • Meyers K.R
        Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (FL)1995
        • Gladsjo J.A
        • Schuman C.C
        • Evans J.D
        • Peavy B.M
        • Miller S.W
        • Heaton R.K
        Norms for letter and category fluency.
        Assessment. 1999; 6: 147-178
        • Millis S.R
        • Rosenthal M
        • Lourie I.F
        Predicting community integration after traumatic brain injury with neuropsychological measures.
        Int J Neurosci. 1994; 79: 165-167
        • Hanks R.A
        • Rapport L.J
        • Millis S.R
        • Deshpande S.A
        Measures of executive functioning as predictors of functional ability and social integration in a rehabilitation sample.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1030-1037
        • Malec J.F
        • Degiorgio L
        Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful completers of 3 postacute brain injury rehabilitation pathways.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1759-1764
        • Powell J.M
        • Machamer J.E
        • Temkin N.R
        • Dikmen S.S
        Self-report of extent of recovery and barriers to recovery after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 1025-1030
        • Sherer M
        • Hart T
        • Nick T.G
        • Whyte J
        • Nakese-Thompson R
        • Yablon S.A
        Early impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 168-176
        • Evans C
        • Sherer M
        • Nakase-Thompson R
        • Novack T
        • Nick T
        Early impaired self-awareness, depression, and subjective well-being following TBI.
        J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003; 9: 253-254
        • Bandura A
        Self-efficacy. WH Freeman, New York1997
        • Dijkers M
        Measuring quality of life.
        in: Fuhrer M.J Assessing medical rehabilitation practices the promise of outcomes research. PH Brookes, Baltimore1997: 153-180
        • Fuhrer M.J
        Subjective well being.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 73: 358-364
        • Kohler C.L
        • Fish L
        • Greene P.G
        The relationship of perceived self-efficacy to quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
        Health Psychol. 2002; 21: 610-614
        • Robinson-Smith G
        • Johnston M.V
        • Allen J
        Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 460-464
        • Holden G
        The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health-related outcomes.
        Soc Work Health Care. 1991; 16: 53-93
        • Holroyd K.A
        • Penzien D.B
        • Hursey K.G
        • et al.
        Change mechanisms in EMG biofeedback training.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984; 52: 1039-1053
        • Schiaffiano K.M
        • Revenson T.A
        • Gibofshy A
        Assessing the impact of self-efficacy beliefs on adaptation to rheumatoid arthritis.
        Arthritis Care Res. 1991; 4: 150-157
        • Berry J.M
        • West R.L
        • Dennehey D
        Reliability and validity of the memory self-efficacy questionnaire.
        Dev Psychol. 1989; 25: 701-713
        • Lachman M.E
        • Steinberg E.S
        • Trotter S.D
        Effects of control beliefs and attributions on memory self-assessments and performance.
        Psychol Aging. 1987; 2: 266-271
        • Lachman M.E
        • Weaver S.L
        • Bandura M.M
        • Elliott E
        • Lewkowicz C.J
        Improving memory and control beliefs through cognitive restructuring and self-generated strategies.
        J Gerontol. 1992; 47: 293-299
        • Rebok G.W
        • Balcerak L.J
        Memory self-efficacy and performance differences in young and old adults.
        Dev Psychol. 1989; 25: 714-721
        • Bandura A
        Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy.
        Dev Psychol. 1989; 25: 729-735
        • Gist M
        • Mitchell T
        Self-efficacy.
        Acad Manage Rev. 1992; 17: 183-211
        • Bandura A
        Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory.
        Psychol Health. 1998; 13: 623-649