Advertisement

The canary in the mine

  • Lisa I. Iezzoni
    Affiliations
    Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; the Charles A. Dana Research Institute; and the Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory, Boston, MA.
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Iezzoni LI. The canary in the mine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1476-8. Many Americans are concerned about their access to health care in the future, especially their ability to pay for needed services. However, a person with a disabling condition requiring ongoing clinical vigilance, supportive care, and other assistive services or technologies faces special difficulties: that person is the “canary in the mine,” warning others about fundamental problems within our health care system. Persons with disabilities who have health insurance are often unable to get items and services not covered by their plans. They experience more problems than others with follow-up care, availability of specialists, getting to doctors, and obtaining help during off hours. These problems suggest that people with disabilities fall into the “quality chasm,” the metaphor used by the Institute of Medicine to describe the gap between ideal care and current reality. The Crossing the Quality Chasm report suggests 6 aims for fundamental reform, exhorting the health care system to become safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. Each of these aims holds special resonance for persons with disabilities. Despite the compelling need to overhaul the health care system, the American public as yet seems little inclined to fundamental change. Perhaps the impetus must come from subgroups within the population who are particularly at risk from the current system, such as persons with disabilities. As solutions are crafted, people with disabilities, their families, and communities should help design and direct fundamental changes to the health care system. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • National Public Radio
        NPR/Kaiser/Kennedy School Poll on Health Care: Americans face problems, but don't want radical change.
        (Available at) (Accessed)
        • Cassel CK
        • Besdine RW
        • Siegel LC.
        Restructuring Medicare for the next century: what will beneficiaries really need?.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 1999; 18: 118-131
      1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Acad Pr, Washington (DC)2001
        • Mitchell LR.
        LRM's Home Page.
        (Available at) (Accessed)
      2. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. Care without coverage. Too little, too late. National Acad Pr, Washington (DC)2002
        • Harris Interactive Inc
        NOD/Harris survey of Americans with disabilities.
        in: Harris Interactive, New York2000: 2000
        • Iezzoni LI
        • McCarthy EP
        • Davis RB
        • Harris-David L
        • O'Day B.
        Use of screening and preventive services among women with disabilities.
        Am J Med Qual. 2001; 16: 135-144
        • Jha A
        • Patrick DL
        • MacLehose RF
        • Doctor JN
        • Chan L.
        Dissatisfaction with medical services among Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83: 1335-1341
        • Marmor TR.
        The politics of Medicare.
        2nd ed. Aldine de Gruyter, New York2000
        • Iezzoni LI
        • Davis RB
        • Soukup J
        • O'Day B.
        Satisfaction with quality and access to health care among people with disabling conditions.
        Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14 (In press)
        • Berwick DM.
        A user's manual for the IOM's “Quality Chasm” report.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 80-90
        • Iezzoni LI
        • McCarthy EP
        • Davis RB
        • Siebens H.
        Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services.
        Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 955-961
        • Chan L
        • Doctor JN
        • MacLehose RF
        • et al.
        Do Medicare patients with disabilities receive preventive services? A population-based study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 642-646
      3. Roetzheim R, Chirikos T. Breast cancer detection and outcomes in a disability beneficiary population. J Health Care Poor Underserved. In press.

      4. 2nd ed. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. Vol I. US Government Printing Office, Washington (DC)Nov 2000