Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees


      Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1464-6. Objective: To evaluate the Pennebaker Emotional Disclosure paradigm with lower-limb amputee patients in terms of compliance and efficacy. Design: Repeated measures. Setting: Home based. Participants: Low compliance, both with the initial mailed request (28%) and the subsequent writing task (48%), resulted in 23 lower-limb amputees who had been fitted with a prosthesis participating. Interventions: Patients completed a 15-minute writing task, 6 times, over 2 weeks, with initial baseline and 2-month follow-up assessments. Main Outcome Measures: Cognitive processing, well-being, adjustment to an artificial limb, pain, and prosthetic use. Results: Stronger emotional disclosure was associated with significant reductions in psychologic and physical aspects of amputees' satisfaction with their prosthesis, some of which were mediated by positive changes in affect immediately after the writing tasks. Conclusions: Our results failed to support previous findings with nonclinical samples; in fact, our results contradicted previous findings. We therefore caution that written emotional disclosure may be contraindicated with lower-limb amputee patients. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Grise MC
        • Gauthier-Gagnon C
        • Martineau GG.
        Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of follow-up questionnaire.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 862-870
        • Davis W.
        Phantom sensation, phantom pain, and stump pain.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74: 79-91
        • Rybatcyzk BD
        • Nicholas JJ
        • Nyenhuis DL.
        Coping with a leg amputation: integrating research and clinical practice.
        Rehabil Psychol. 1997; 42: 241-256
        • Gallagher P
        • MacLachlan M.
        Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs.
        Behav Med. 1999; 25: 117-124
        • Pennebaker JW.
        Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process.
        Psychol Sci. 1997; 8: 162-166
        • Smyth JM.
        Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables.
        J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998; 66: 174-184
        • Horowtiz M
        • Wilner N
        • Alvarez W.
        Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
        Psychosom Med. 1979; 41: 209-218
      1. Psychol Med. 1998; 28: 551-558
        • Gallagher P
        • MacLachlan M.
        The development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES).
        Rehabil Psychol. 2000; 45: 130-155
        • Watson D
        • Clark LA
        • Tellegen A.
        Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
        J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54: 1063-1070