Advertisement

The effectiveness of a hands-free environmental control system for the profoundly disabled

      Abstract

      Craig A, Moses P, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Kirkup L. The effectiveness of a hands-free environmental control system for the profoundly disabled. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1455-8. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a hands-free environmental control system (ECS) that allows profoundly disabled persons to activate and control electric devices in their home by using consciously controlled changes in their brain signals. Design: A cohort study with a field trial testing of the ECS on 3 occasions. Setting: Participants' homes. Participants: Ten profoundly disabled persons (mean age, 42.9y), all of whom had very limited movement from the neck downward. Six had spinal cord injury with lesions ranging from C2 to C5–6. The other 4 had profound disability (1 each from polio, spinal muscular atrophy, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy). Interventions: Participants performed tasks on each of 3 test occasions. The tasks consisted of turning a television on at the beginning of the trial, changing channels (up, down), changing volume, and turning it off at the conclusion of each trial. Main Outcome Measures: Time participants took to select the correct option and number of errors made in selecting the correct option. Measures were taken for each trial, so that any improvement in switching could be detected. Results: All participants effectively used the ECS to operate their television sets. Selecting a correct option took about 30 seconds (with the majority of this time attributed to machine cycling time), with an error rate of 1.8 per 5 options selected. The time taken to operate the ECS reduced slightly over the 3 trials and selection errors reduced by around 50% (to less than 1 error per 5 options). Conclusions: With minimal training, profoundly disabled persons were able to use an ECS that uses changes in brain wave signals. This result demonstrates the efficacy of an additional and novel ECS in an area in which few switches are available. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anke AG
        • Stenehjem AE
        • Stanghelle JK.
        Pain and life quality within 2 years of spinal cord injury.
        Paraplegia. 1995; 33: 555-559
        • Craig A
        • Hancock K.
        Living with spinal cord injury: longitudinal factors, interventions and outcomes.
        Clin Psychol Psychother. 1998; 5: 102-108
        • Craig AR
        • Hancock KM
        • Dickson HG
        • Chang E.
        Long-term psychological outcomes in spinal cord injured persons: results of a controlled trial using cognitive behavior therapy.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 33-38
        • Craig AR
        • Hancock KM
        • Chang E
        • Dickson HG.
        Improving life outcomes of spinal injured persons post injury: results of a controlled trial.
        Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 345-350
        • Kishi Y
        • Robinson RG
        • Forrester AW.
        Prospective longitudinal study of depression following spinal cord injury.
        J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994; 6: 237-244
        • Krause JS.
        Adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 9-year longitudinal study.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 651-657
        • Stover SL
        • DeLisa JA
        • Whiteneck GG.
        Spinal cord injury: clinical outcomes from the model systems.
        Aspen, Gaithersburg (MD)1995
        • Barnes MP.
        Switching devices and independence of disabled people.
        BMJ. 1994; 309: 1181-1182
        • Wellings DJ
        • Unsworth J.
        Fortnightly review: environmental control systems for people with a disability: an update.
        BMJ. 1997; 315: 409-412
        • Thornett CE.
        Designing special switches and control systems for multiply handicapped young people—a problem-led approach.
        J Med Eng Technol. 1990; 14: 87-91
        • Craig A
        • McIsaac P
        • Kirkup L
        • Searle A
        • Moses P.
        Mind over matter: alpha electroencephalographic activity in the brain.
        Today's Life Sci. 1997; 9: 12-15
        • Kirkup L
        • Searle A
        • Craig A
        • McIsaac P
        • Moses P.
        EEG-based system for rapid on-off switching without prior learning.
        Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997; 35: 504-509
        • Craig A
        • McIsaac P
        • Tran Y
        • Kirkup L
        • Searle A.
        Alpha wave reactivity following eye closure: a potential method of remote hands free control for the disabled.
        Technol Disabil. 1999; 10: 187-194
        • Craig A
        • Tran Y
        • McIsaac P
        • Moses P
        • Kirkup L
        • Searle A.
        The effectiveness of activating electrical devices using alpha wave synchronisation contingent with eye closure.
        Appl Ergon. 2000; 31: 377-382
        • Fisch BJ.
        Spehlmann's EEG primer.
        Elsevier Science, Amsterdam1991
        • Kirkup L
        • Searle A
        • Craig A
        • McIsaac P
        • Larsen G.
        Three methods compared for detecting onset of alpha wave synchronisation following eye closure.
        Physiol Meas. 1998; 19: 213-224
        • Sackett DL
        • Rosenberg WM
        • Muir Gray JA
        • Haynes RB
        • Richardson WS.
        Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't: It's about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 71-72