Advertisement

Opening the Black Box: Lessons Learned From an Interdisciplinary Inquiry Into the Learning-Based Contents of Brain Injury Rehabilitation

      Abstract

      This article describes challenges encountered and lessons learned in an effort to explore the black box of rehabilitation. A multidisciplinary team created detailed, mutually exclusive operational definitions for the contents of learning-based treatments administered in a brain injury unit. The function and activity levels of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health were used to organize content definitions, which included examples of therapy activities and therapist behaviors, such as cues. Pairs of trained coders independently identified defined learning episodes within each minute of 128 videotaped physical, occupational, or speech therapy sessions. Interrater agreement was generally acceptable and did not vary by discipline of session, discipline of coder, or whether coders were clinically trained. Disagreements typically involved the threshold for determining that a learning episode had occurred, or deciding between function and activity codes where the surface content of the sessions were similar. The focus on individual therapy sessions allowed for rich qualitative detail, but a less granular analysis will be necessary for comprehensive efforts to characterize the contents of therapy.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), OT (occupational therapy), PBE (practice-based evidence), PT (physical therapy), RA (research assistant), RTT (rehabilitation treatment taxonomy), ST (speech therapy), TBI (traumatic brain injury), TR (therapeutic recreation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • Tsaousides T.
        • Whyte J.
        • Zanca J.M.
        Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: past, present, and prospects.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S6-S16
        • Whyte J.
        • Hart T.
        It's more than a black box, it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82: 639-652
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.
        • Gassaway J.
        • Slavin M.
        • Dijkers M.
        Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 678-686
        • Whyte J.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • et al.
        Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: conceptual issues.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S24-S32
        • Hale L.A.
        • Piggot J.
        Exploring the content of physiotherapeutic home-based stroke rehabilitation in New Zealand.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 1933-1940
        • Tyson S.
        • Selley A.
        A content analysis of physiotherapy for postural control in people with stroke: an observational study.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 865-872
        • Latham N.K.
        • Jette D.U.
        • Coster W.
        • et al.
        Occupational therapy activities and intervention techniques for clients with stroke in six rehabilitation hospitals.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60: 369-378
        • Ballinger C.
        • Ashburn A.
        • Low J.
        • Roderick P.
        Unpacking the black box of therapy: a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13: 301-309
        • Putman K.
        • De Wit L.
        • Schupp W.
        • et al.
        Use of time by physiotherapist and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: a comparison between four European rehabilitation centres.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28: 1417-1424
        • De Wit L.
        • Putman K.
        • Lincoln N.
        • et al.
        Stroke rehabilitation in Europe: what do physiotherapists and occupational therapists actually do?.
        Stroke. 2006; 37: 1483-1489
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • Postma K.
        • Leenders J.
        • Pons K.
        Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1454-1459
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • et al.
        Reliability of a new classification system for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the Spinal Cord Injury-Interventions Classification System.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1229-1236
        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Semik P.
        • Mallinson T.
        Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels:p inside the black box of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1901-1908
        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Semik P.
        • Mallinson T.
        Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke.
        Stroke. 2004; 35: 2537-2542
        • Hart T.
        • Dijkers M.
        • Whyte J.
        • Braden C.
        • Trott C.
        • Fraser R.
        Vocational interventions and supports following job placement for persons with traumatic brain injury.
        J Vocat Rehabil. 2010; 32: 135-150
        • Phillips J.
        • Drummond A.
        • Radford K.
        • Tyerman A.
        Return to work after traumatic brain injury: recording, measuring and describing occupational therapy intervention.
        Br J Occup Ther. 2010; 73: 1-9
        • Gassaway J.
        • Horn S.D.
        • DeJong G.
        • Smout R.J.
        • Clark C.
        • James R.
        Applying the clinical practice improvement approach to stroke rehabilitation: methods used and baseline results.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S16-S33
        • Horn S.D.
        • Gassaway J.
        Practice based evidence: incorporating clinical heterogeneity and patient-reported outcomes for comparative effectiveness research.
        Med Care. 2010; 48: S17-S22
        • DeJong G.
        • Tian W.
        • Smout R.J.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of joint replacement rehabilitation patients discharged from skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1306-1316
        • Ottenbacher K.J.
        The post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes project.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S121-S123
        • Fuhrer M.J.
        • Keith R.A.
        Facilitating patient learning during medical rehabilitation.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 557-561
      1. Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Schell BAB, editors. Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2003.

      2. Umphred D. Neurological rehabilitation. 4th ed. Mosby, St Louis2001
        • Rosenthal M.
        • Griffith E.R.
        • Kreutzer J.S.
        • Pentland B.
        Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury.
        FA Davis, Philadelphia1999
        • Occupational Therapy Practice Framework
        Domain and process.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2002; 56: 609-639
      3. American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to physical therapist practice. Revised 2nd ed. Alexandria: American Physical Therapy Association; 2003.

        • World Health Organization
        ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2001
        • Hart T.
        • Tsaousides T.
        • Zanca J.M.
        • et al.
        Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S33-S44