Advertisement

Treatment Taxonomy for Rehabilitation: Past, Present, and Prospects

      Abstract

      The idea of constructing a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions has been around for quite some time, but other than small and mostly ad hoc efforts, not much progress has been made, in spite of articulate pleas by some well-respected clinician scholars. In this article, treatment taxonomies used in health care, and in rehabilitation specifically, are selectively reviewed, with a focus on the need to base a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy (RTT) on the “active ingredients” of treatments and their link to patient/client deficits/problems that are targeted in therapy. This is followed by a description of what we see as a fruitful approach to the development of an RTT that crosses disciplines, settings, and patient diagnoses, and a discussion of the potential uses in and benefits of a well-developed RTT for clinical service, research, education, and service administration.

      Keywords

      List of abbreviations:

      ADL (activities of daily living), CPT (Current Procedural Terminology), ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), NIC (Nursing Interventions Classification), OT (occupational therapy), PBE (practice-based evidence), PT (physical therapy), RTT (rehabilitation treatment taxonomy), SCI (spinal cord injury), TBI (traumatic brain injury)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Semik P.
        • Mallinson T.
        Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the “black box” of inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1901-1908
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Conroy B.
        • Nichols D.
        • Healton E.B.
        Opening the black box of poststroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S1-S7
        • Whyte J.
        • Hart T.
        It's more than a black box; it's a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 82: 639-652
        • Wade D.T.
        Research into the black box of rehabilitation: the risks of a type III error.
        Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15: 1-4
        • Ballinger C.
        • Ashburn A.
        • Low J.
        • Roderick P.
        Unpacking the black box of therapy—a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke.
        Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13: 301-309
        • Johnston M.V.
        • Keith R.A.
        • Hinderer S.R.
        Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73: S3-23
        • Dijkers M.
        • Kropp G.C.
        • Esper R.M.
        • Yavuzer G.
        • Cullen N.
        • Bakdalieh Y.
        Quality of intervention research reporting in medical rehabilitation journals.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81: 21-33
      1. Dijkers MPJM, Gordon WA. Should we do more research on treatments after TBI? In: The 2nd Federal Interagency Conference on Traumatic Brain Injury: Integrating Models of Research and Service Delivery. Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation. p 57.

        • van Heugten C.
        • Wolters Gregorio G.
        • Wade D.
        Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a systematic review of content of treatment.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012; 22: 653-673
        • DeJong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Gassaway J.A.
        • Slavin M.D.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the “black box” of rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 678-686
        • Keith R.A.
        Treatment strength in rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 1298-1304
        • Bode R.K.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Zahara D.
        • Lovell L.
        Outcomes in two post-acute non-inpatient rehabilitation settings.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14: 38-47
        • Whyte J.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Hart T.
        • et al.
        Development of a theory-driven rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: conceptual issues.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S24-S32
        • Page S.J.
        • Schmid A.
        • Harris J.E.
        Optimizing terminology for stroke motor rehabilitation: recommendations from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1395-1399
        • Barak A.
        • Klein B.
        • Proudfoot J.G.
        Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions.
        Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38: 4-17
        • Bruton A.
        • Garrod R.
        • Thomas M.
        Respiratory physiotherapy: towards a clearer definition of terminology.
        Physiotherapy. 2011; 97: 345-349
        • Hoenig H.
        • Lee J.
        • Stineman M.
        Conceptual overview of frameworks for measuring quality in rehabilitation.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010; 17: 239-251
        • Whyte J.
        A grand unified theory of rehabilitation (we wish!). The 57th John Stanley Coulter Memorial Lecture.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 203-209
        • Bailey K.
        Typologies and taxonomies: an introduction to classification techniques.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks1994 (Quantitative applications in the social sciences, no. 07-102.)
        • Lambe P.
        Organising knowledge: taxonomies, knowledge and organisational effectiveness.
        Chandos Publishing, Oxford2007
        • Kane R.L.
        Improving outcomes in rehabilitation. A call to arms (and legs).
        Med Care. 1997; 35: JS21-JS27
        • Bickman L.
        The functions of program theory.
        in: Bickman L. Using program theory in evaluation. Sage, London1987: 5-18
        • Chen H.
        • Rossi P.H.
        The multi-goal, theory-driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science.
        Soc Forces. 1980; 59: 106-122
        • Hart T.
        • Fann J.R.
        • Novack T.A.
        The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008; 18: 1-21
        • Whyte J.
        Using treatment theories to refine the designs of brain injury rehabilitation treatment effectiveness studies.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21: 99-106
        • Hess L.M.
        Designing conceptual model-based research in chemotherapy-related changes in cognitive function.
        Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010; 678: 37-54
        • Keith R.A.
        • Lipsey M.W.
        The role of theory in rehabilitation assessment, treatment, and outcomes.
        in: Glueckauf R.L. Sechrest L.B. Bond G.R. McDonel E.C. Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health. Sage, Newbury Park1993: 33-58
        • Whyte J.
        Distinctive methodologic challenges.
        in: Fuhrer M. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices. The promise of outcomes research. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore1997: 43-59
        • Duncan P.
        • Hoenig H.
        • Samsa G.
        • Hamilton B.
        Characterizing rehabilitation interventions.
        in: Fuhrer M. Assessing medical rehabilitation practices. The promise of outcomes research. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore1997: 307-317
        • Fuhrer M.J.
        • Jutai J.W.
        • Scherer M.J.
        • DeRuyter F.
        A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25: 1243-1251
        • Cordray D.S.
        • Pion G.M.
        Psychosocial rehabilitation assessment: a broader perspective.
        in: Glueckauf R.L. Bond G. Sechrest L. McDonel B. Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health. Sage, Newbury Park1993: 215-240
        • Warren S.F.
        • Fey M.E.
        • Yoder P.J.
        Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions.
        Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007; 13: 70-77
        • Baker E.
        Optimal intervention intensity.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14: 401-409
        • Baker E.
        Optimal intervention intensity in speech-language pathology: discoveries, challenges, and unchartered territories.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14: 478-485
        • Robey R.R.
        A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research.
        J Commun Disord. 2004; 37: 401-411
        • Whyte J.
        • Gordon W.
        • Rothi L.J.
        A phased developmental approach to neurorehabilitation research: the science of knowledge building.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: S3-10
        • Whyte J.
        • Barrett A.
        Advancing the evidence base of the rehabilitation treatments: a developmental approach.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: S101-S110
        • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
        Department of Education. Notice of proposed long-range plan for fiscal years 2013-2017.
        Fed Regist. 2012; 77: 23231-23237
        • Michie S.
        • Fixsen D.
        • Grimshaw J.M.
        • Eccles M.P.
        Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 40
      2. American Medical Association. CPT: Current Procedural Terminology. 4th revised ed. American Medical Association, Chicago2004
      3. SNOMED International Web site. Available at: http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/. Accessed June 13, 2007.

        • Martin K.S.
        The Omaha system: a key to practice, documentation, and information management.
        2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia2005
        • Bowles K.H.
        • Martin K.S.
        • Naylor M.D.
        Using the Omaha system to describe what's inside the black box.
        Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006; 17: 21
      4. Bulecheck G.M. Butcher H.K. Dochterman J.M. Wagner C. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 6th ed. Elsevier, St Louis2013
        • Saba V.K.
        Home health care classification.
        Caring. 1992; 11: 58-60
        • Saba V.
        Clinical Care Classification (CCC) system manual. A guide to nursing documentation.
        Springer, New York2006
      5. International Council of Nurses. EHEALTH. Available at: http://www.icn.ch/pillarsprograms/international-classification-fornursing-practice-icnpr/. Accessed June 13, 2007.

        • Bulechek G.M.
        • Butcher H.K.
        • McCloskey Dochterman J.
        Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC).
        5th ed. Elsevier, Philadelphia2008
        • Kunstaetter D.
        Occupational therapy treatment in home health care.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1988; 42: 513-519
        • Neistadt M.E.
        • Seymour S.G.
        Treatment activity preferences of occupational therapists in adult physical dysfunction settings.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1995; 49: 437-443
        • Taylor E.
        • Manguno J.
        Use of treatment activities in occupational therapy.
        Am J Occup Ther. 1991; 45: 317-322
        • DeRosa C.P.
        • Porterfield J.A.
        A physical therapy model for the treatment of low back pain.
        Phys Ther. 1992; 72: 261-269
      6. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings. Vol 45. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda2004
        • Sigelman C.
        • Vengroff L.
        • Spanhell C.
        Disability and the concept of life functions.
        Rehabil Couns Bull. 1979; 23: 103-113
        • Coulton C.J.
        Person-environment fit as the focus in health care.
        Soc Work. 1981; 26: 26-35
        • Scofield M.E.
        • Pape D.A.
        • McCracken N.
        • Maki D.R.
        An ecological model for promoting acceptance of disability.
        J Appl Rehabil Couns. 1980; 11: 183-187
        • Livneh H.
        Rehabilitation intervention strategies: their integration and classification.
        J Rehabil. 1989; 55: 21-30
      7. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva2001
        • Finger M.E.
        • Cieza A.
        • Stoll J.
        • Stucki G.
        • Huber E.O.
        Identification of intervention categories for physical therapy, based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a Delphi exercise.
        Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 1203-1220
        • Xu K.
        • Wang L.
        • Mai J.
        • He L.
        Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy and electrical stimulation on hand function of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a controlled clinical trial.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34: 337-346
        • Hart T.
        • Tsaousides T.
        • Zanca J.M.
        • et al.
        Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S33-S44
        • Hoenig H.
        • Horner R.D.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Clipp E.
        • Hamilton B.
        New horizons in stroke rehabilitation research.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999; 36: 19-31
        • Hoenig H.
        • Sloane R.
        • Horner R.D.
        • Zolkewitz M.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Hamilton B.B.
        A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81: 853-862
        • Hoenig H.
        • Duncan P.W.
        • Horner R.D.
        • et al.
        Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
        Med Care. 2002; 40: 1036-1047
        • Reker D.M.
        • Hoenig H.
        • Zolkewitz M.A.
        • et al.
        The structure and structural effects of VA rehabilitation bedservice care for stroke.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000; 37: 483-491
      8. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: Vol I: The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1980.

        • Strasser D.C.
        • Smits S.J.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Herrin J.S.
        • Bowen S.E.
        The influence of hospital culture on rehabilitation team functioning in VA hospitals.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002; 39: 115-125
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Herrin J.S.
        • Bowen S.E.
        • Stevens A.B.
        • Uomoto J.
        Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 403-409
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Falconer J.A.
        • Stevens A.B.
        • et al.
        Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 10-15
        • Finkenflugel H.
        • Cornielje H.
        • Velema J.
        The use of classification models in the evaluation of CBR programmes.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30: 348-354
        • Hart T.
        • Dijkers M.
        • Fraser R.
        • et al.
        Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: treatment definition and diversity within model systems of care.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21: 467-482
        • Malec J.F.
        • Basford J.S.
        Postacute brain injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 198-207
        • Glenn M.B.
        • Rotman M.
        • Goldstein R.
        • Selleck E.A.
        Characteristics of residential community integration programs for adults with brain injury.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005; 20: 393-401
        • Glenn M.B.
        • Selleck E.A.
        • Goldstein R.
        • Rotman M.
        Characteristics of home-based community integration programmes for adults with brain injury.
        Brain Inj. 2005; 19: 1243-1247
        • Whyte J.
        Invited commentary on quality of care indicators for the rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury, and quality of care indicators for the structure and organization of inpatient rehabilitation care of children with traumatic brain injury.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: 394-395
        • Conroy B.E.
        • Hatfield B.
        • Nichols D.
        Opening the black box of stroke rehabilitation with clinical practice improvement methodology.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005; 12: 36-48
        • Latham N.K.
        • Jette D.U.
        • Coster W.
        • et al.
        Occupational therapy activities and intervention techniques for clients with stroke in six rehabilitation hospitals.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2006; 60: 369-378
        • Richards L.G.
        • Latham N.K.
        • Jette D.U.
        • Rosenberg L.
        • Smout R.J.
        • DeJong G.
        Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: S51-S60
        • DeJong G.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Gassaway J.
        • et al.
        Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90: 1269-1283
        • Tian W.
        • Dejong G.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Putman K.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Davanzo J.E.
        Efficient rehabilitation care for joint replacement patients: skilled nursing facility or inpatient rehabilitation facility?.
        Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 176-187
        • Whiteneck G.
        • Gassaway J.
        • Dijkers M.
        • Jha A.
        New approach to study the contents and outcomes of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the SCIRehab Project.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 251-259
        • Gassaway J.
        • Whiteneck G.
        • Dijkers M.
        SCIRehab: clinical taxonomy development and application in spinal cord injury rehabilitation research.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32: 260-269
      9. Zanca J, Dijkers MP, Bennet R, Seel R, Young J. Variations in patient characteristics and inpatient rehabilitation interventions among TBI case mix groups. In: Proceedings of the Federal Interagency Conference on Traumatic Brain Injury. Available at: http://tbi-interagency-conference.org/materials/presentations/TBI-36.html.

        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Brandstater M.
        • Horn S.
        • Ryser D.
        • Barrett R.
        Inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: the influence of age on treatments and outcomes.
        Neurorehabilitation. 2013; 32: 23-52
        • Horn S.D.
        • Gassaway J.
        Practice-based evidence study design for comparative effectiveness research.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S50-S57
        • Horn S.D.
        • DeJong G.
        • Deutscher D.
        Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 93: S127-S137
        • Zanca J.M.
        • Dijkers M.P.
        Describing what we do: a qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on classifying rehabilitation interventions.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S55-S65
        • van Langeveld S.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.
        • Postma K.
        • Leenders J.
        • Pons K.
        Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89: 1454-1459
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • Postma K.
        • Ten Dam D.
        • Pons K.
        Development of a classification of physical therapy, occupational therapy and sports therapy interventions to document mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
        J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008; 32: 2-7
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • et al.
        Comparing content of therapy for people with a spinal cord injury in postacute inpatient rehabilitation in Australia, Norway, and The Netherlands.
        Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 210-224
        • van Langeveld S.A.
        • Post M.W.
        • van Asbeck F.W.
        • et al.
        Contents of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy sessions for patients with a spinal cord injury in three Dutch rehabilitation centres.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33: 412-422
        • Pomeroy V.M.
        • Niven D.S.
        • Barrow S.
        • Faragher E.B.
        • Tallis R.C.
        Unpacking the black box of nursing and therapy practice for post-stroke shoulder pain: a precursor to evaluation.
        Clin Rehabil. 2001; 15: 67-83
        • Hart T.
        • Ferraro M.
        • Myers R.
        • Ellis C.A.
        Opening the black box: lessons learned from an interdisciplinary inquiry into the learning-based contents of brain injury rehabilitation.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S66-S73
        • Dijkers M.P.
        • Kropp G.C.
        • Esper R.M.
        • Yavuzer G.
        • Cullen N.
        • Bakdalieh Y.
        Reporting on reliability and validity of outcome measures in medical rehabilitation research.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24: 819-827
        • Lincoln N.B.
        • Parry R.H.
        • Vass C.D.
        Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke.
        Stroke. 1999; 30: 573-579
        • Heinemann A.W.
        • Hamilton B.
        • Linacre J.M.
        • Wright B.D.
        • Granger C.
        Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 74: 315-326
        • Partridge C.
        • Mackenzie M.
        • Edwards S.
        • et al.
        Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
        Physiother Res Int. 2000; 5: 230-240
        • Kwakkel G.
        • Wagenaar R.C.
        • Koelman T.W.
        • Lankhorst G.J.
        • Koetsier J.C.
        Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis.
        Stroke. 1997; 28: 1550-1556
        • Baker J.G.
        • Fiedler R.C.
        • Ottenbacher K.J.
        • Czyrny J.J.
        • Heinemann A.W.
        Predicting follow-up functional outcomes in outpatient rehabilitation.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 202-212
        • DeJong G.
        • Hsieh C.H.
        • Putman K.
        • Smout R.J.
        • Horn S.D.
        • Tian W.
        Physical therapy activities in stroke, knee arthroplasty, and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: their variation, similarities, and association with functional outcomes.
        Phys Ther. 2011; 91: 1826-1837
        • Gassaway J.
        • Horn S.D.
        • DeJong G.
        • Smout R.J.
        • Clark C.
        • James R.
        Applying the clinical practice improvement approach to stroke rehabilitation: methods used and baseline results.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86: 16-33
        • Tripp Reimer T.
        • Woodworth G.
        • McCloskey J.C.
        • Bulechek G.
        The dimensional structure of nursing interventions.
        Nurs Res. 1996; 45: 10-17
      10. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: domain and process.
        Am J Occup Ther. 2002; 56: 609-639
      11. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. Available at: http://www.asha.org/policy/SP2007-00283/.

      12. Zielstorff RD. Characteristics of a good nursing nomenclature from an informatics perspective. Online J Issues Nurs September 30, 1998;4:manuscript no. 4. Available at: www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol31998/No2Sept1998/CharacteristicsofNomenclaturefromInformaticsPerspective.aspx.

        • Hart T.
        Treatment definition in complex rehabilitation interventions.
        Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009; 19: 824-840
        • Stevens A.B.
        • Strasser D.C.
        • Uomoto J.
        • Bowen S.E.
        • Falconer J.A.
        Utility of treatment implementation methods in clinical trial with rehabilitation teams.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007; 44: 537-546
        • Slade S.C.
        • Keating J.L.
        Unloaded movement facilitation exercise compared to no exercise or alternative therapy on outcomes for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007; 30: 301-311
        • Piazzini D.B.
        • Aprile I.
        • Ferrara P.E.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
        Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21: 299-314
        • Nijhuis B.J.
        • Reinders-Messelink H.A.
        • de Blecourt A.C.
        • et al.
        A review of salient elements defining team collaboration in paediatric rehabilitation.
        Clin Rehabil. 2007; 21: 195-211
        • Boutron I.
        • Moher D.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Ravaud P.
        CONSORT Group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
        Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 295-309
        • Hagstrom F.
        Using and building theory in clinical action.
        J Commun Disord. 2001; 34: 371-384
        • Mintken P.E.
        • DeRosa C.
        • Little T.
        • Smith B.
        AAOMPT clinical guidelines: a model for standardizing manipulation terminology in physical therapy practice.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008; 38: A1-A6
      13. Paralyzed Veterans of America. The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Available at: http://www.pva.org/site/c.ajIRK9NJLcJ2E/b.6431479/k.3D9E/Consortium_for_Spinal_Cord_Medicine.htm. Accessed June 13, 2007.

        • Kwan J.
        Care pathways for acute stroke care and stroke rehabilitation: from theory to evidence.
        J Clin Neurosci. 2007; 14: 189-200
        • Playford E.D.
        • Sachs R.
        • Thompson A.J.
        Integrated care pathways: outcome from inpatient rehabilitation following nontraumatic spinal cord lesion.
        Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 269-275
        • Mcilvoy L.
        • Spain D.A.
        • Raque G.
        • Vitaz T.
        • Boaz P.
        • Meyer K.
        Successful incorporation of the severe head injury guidelines into a phased-outcome clinical pathway.
        J Neurosci Nurs. 2001; 33 (82): 72-78
        • Healy W.L.
        • Ayers M.E.
        • Iorio R.
        • Patch D.A.
        • Appleby D.
        • Pfeifer B.A.
        Impact of a clinical pathway and implant standardization on total hip arthroplasty: a clinical and economic study of short-term patient outcome.
        J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13: 266-276
        • Burns S.P.
        • Nelson A.L.
        • Bosshart H.T.
        • et al.
        Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury.
        J Spinal Cord Med. 2005; 28: 33-42
        • Essock S.M.
        • Covell N.H.
        • Weissman E.M.
        Inside the black box: the importance of monitoring treatment implementation.
        Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30: 613-615
        • Whyte J.
        Contributions of treatment theory and enablement theory to rehabilitation research and practice.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95: S17-S23
        • Hart T.
        • Evans J.
        Self-regulation and goal theories in brain injury rehabilitation.
        J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006; 21: 142-155