Advertisement

A Distinct Pattern of Myofascial Findings in Patients After Whiplash Injury

      Abstract

      Ettlin T, Schuster C, Stoffel R, Brüderlin A, Kischka U. A distinct pattern of myofascial findings in patients after whiplash injury.

      Objective

      To identify objective clinical examinations for the diagnosis of whiplash syndrome, whereby we focused on trigger points.

      Design

      A cross-sectional study with 1 measurement point.

      Setting

      A quiet treatment room in a rehabilitation center.

      Participants

      Patients (n=124) and healthy subjects (n=24) participated in this study. Among the patient group were patients with whiplash-associated disorders (n=47), fibromyalgia (n=21), nontraumatic chronic cervical syndrome (n=17), and endogenous depression (n=15).

      Interventions

      Not applicable.

      Main Outcome Measure

      Each patient and control subject had a manual examination for trigger points of the semispinalis capitis, trapezius pars descendens, levator scapulae, scalenus medius, sternocleidomastoideus, and masseter muscles bilaterally.

      Results

      Forty (85.1%) of the patients with whiplash had positive trigger points in the semispinalis capitis muscle. The patients with whiplash had a significantly higher prevalence of positive trigger points in the semispinalis capitis muscle than any of the control groups (P<.05). For the other examined muscles, the prevalence of trigger points in the patients with whiplash did not differ significantly from the patients with fibromyalgia or nontraumatic chronic cervical syndrome. It did differ from the patients with endogenous depression and the healthy controls.

      Conclusions

      Patients with whiplash showed a distinct pattern of trigger point distribution that differed significantly from other patient groups and healthy subjects. The semispinalis capitis muscle was more frequently affected by trigger points in patients with whiplash, whereas other neck and shoulder muscles and the masseter muscle did not differentiate between patients with whiplash and patients with nontraumatic chronic cervical syndrome or fibromyalgia.

      Key Words

      List of Abbreviations:

      BDI (Beck Depression Inventory), ROM (range of motion), VAS (visual analog scale)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Radanov B.P.
        • Sturzenegger M.
        • di Stefano G.
        Long-term outcome after whiplash injury: a 2-year follow-up considering features of injury mechanism and somatic, radiologic and psychosocial findings.
        Medicine. 1996; 74: 291-297
        • Kischka U.
        • Ettlin T.
        • Heim S.
        • et al.
        Long term cerebral symptoms following whiplash injury.
        Eur Neurol. 1991; 31: 136-140
        • Ettlin T.
        • Kischka U.
        • Reichmann S.
        • et al.
        Cerebral symptoms after whiplash injury of the neck: a prospective clinical and neuropsychological study of whiplash injury.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992; 55: 943-948
        • Spitzer W.O.
        • Skovron M.L.
        • Salmi L.R.
        • et al.
        Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 1S-73S
        • Barnsley L.
        • Lord S.
        • Bogduk N.
        Comparative local anesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain.
        Pain. 1993; 55: 99-106
        • Taylor J.R.
        • Twomey L.T.
        Acute injuries to cervical joints: an autopsy study of neck sprain.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1115-1122
        • Taylor J.R.
        Cervical spine injuries in fatal motor vehicle trauma.
        in: Griffiths M. Brown J. The biomechanics of neck injury: proceedings. Institution of Engineers, Canberra1995: 11-19
        • Alexandre A.
        • Corò L.
        • Azuelos A.
        • Pellone M.
        Thoracic outlet syndrome due to hyperextension-hyperflexion cervical injury.
        Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005; 92: 21-24
        • Barnsley L.
        • Lord S.M.
        • Wallis B.J.
        • Bogduk N.
        The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 20-25
        • Lord S.M.
        • Barnsley L.
        • Wallis B.J.
        • Bogduk N.
        Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash: a placebo-controlled prevalence study.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 1737-1744
        • Sola A.E.
        • Rodenberger M.L.
        • Gettys B.B.
        Incidence of hypersensitive areas in posterior shoulder muscles; a survey of two hundred young adults.
        Am J Phys Med. 1955; 34: 585-590
        • Imboden J.
        • Hellmann D.
        • Stone J.
        Current rheumatology diagnosis and treatment.
        2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York2007
        • Beck A.T.
        • Steer R.A.
        Internal consistencies of the original and revised Beck Depression Inventory.
        J Clin Psychol. 1984; 40: 1365-1367
        • Simons D.G.
        • Travell J.G.
        • Simons L.S.
        2nd ed. Myofascial pain and dysfunction, the trigger point manual, the upper extremities. Vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1999
        • Simons D.G.
        Myofascial trigger points and the whiplash syndrome.
        Clin J Pain. 1989; 5: 279
        • Mannion A.F.
        • Klein G.N.
        • Dvorak J.
        • Lanz C.
        Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device.
        Eur Spine J. 2000; 9: 379-385
        • Castro W.H.
        • Sautmann A.
        • Schilgen M.
        • Sautmann M.
        Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex: an experimental examination.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 443-449
        • Gerwin R.D.
        • Shannon S.
        • Hong C.Z.
        • Hubbard D.
        • Gevirtz R.
        Inter-rater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination.
        Pain. 1997; 69: 65-73
        • Sciotti V.M.
        • Mittak V.L.
        • DiMarco L.
        • et al.
        Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle.
        Pain. 2001; 93: 259-266
        • Simons D.G.
        • Travell J.G.
        Myofascial trigger points, a possible explanation.
        Pain. 1981; 10: 106-109
        • Mense S.
        Referral of muscle pain: new aspects.
        Am Pain Soc J. 1994; 3: 1-9
        • Simons D.G.
        • Hong C.Z.
        • Simons L.S.
        Endplate potentials are common to midfiber myofascial trigger points.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 81: 212-222
        • Gerwin R.D.
        • Dommerholt J.
        • Shah J.P.
        An expansion of Simons' integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation.
        Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004; 8: 468-475
        • Mense S.
        • Simons D.
        • Russell I.J.
        Muscle pain: understanding its nature, diagnosis, and treatment.
        Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore2001