Article| Volume 73, ISSUE 10, P893-898, October 1992

Intertester reliability of judgments of the presence of trigger points in patients with low back pain

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      The purpose of this study was to determine the intertester reliability of assessments of the presence of trigger points in the region of the lumbar spine of patients with low back pain (LBP). A total of six trigger points described by Travell and Simons were studied. The trigger point examination procedures described by Travell and Simons were used by 12 physical therapists. Randomly paired therapists examined 50 patients for 197 trigger points. The Kappa coefficient, percent agreement, the observed proportion of positive agreement (Ppos), and the observed proportion of negative agreement (Pneg) were used to describe reliability. Kappa values ranged from .29 to .38. Percent agreement ranged from 76% to 79%. Ppos ranged from .43 to .52. The low Kappa and Ppos values suggest different therapists are unable to reliably determine when a trigger point is present in a patient with LBP. This study suggests the usefulness of examining for the presence of trigger points in patients with LBP should be questioned.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kellgren JH
        Observation on referred pain arising from muscle.
        Clin Sci. 1938; 3: 175-190
        • Steindler A
        The interpretation of sciatic radiation and the syndrome of low back pain.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 1940; 22: 28-34
        • Elliott FA
        Tender muscles in sciatica.
        Lancet. 1944; 1: 47-49
        • Inman VT
        • Saunders JB
        Referred pain from skeletal structures.
        J Nerv Ment Dis. 1944; : 660-667
        • Sola AE
        • Kuitert JH
        Myofascial trigger point pain in the neck and shoulder girdle.
        Northwest Med. 1955; 54: 980-984
        • Travell JG
        • Simons DG
        Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The trigger point manual.
        Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore1983
        • Bogduk N
        Innervation, pain patterns and mechanisms of pain production.
        in: Twomey LT Taylor JR Physical therapy of the low back. Churchill Livingstone, New York1987: 85-101
        • Grieve GP
        Common vertebral joint problems.
        in: Churchill Livingstone, New York1981: 110-120
        • Grieve GP
        Common vertebral joint problems.
        in: Churchill Livingstone, New York1981: 196-199
        • Mennell JM
        Trigger points in referred spinal pain.
        in: Grieve GP Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. Churchill Livingstone, New York1986: 250-258
        • Calliett R
        Low back pain syndromes.
        in: 3rd ed. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia1987: 86-87
        • Travell JG
        Myofascial trigger point: Clinical view.
        in: Bonica JJ Albe-Fessard D Advances in pain research and therapy. Raven Press, New York1976: 919-926
      1. Kerlinger Foundations of behavioral research. 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York1973: 442-478
        • Cohen J
        A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1960; 20: 37-46
        • Cicchetti DV
        • Feinstein AR
        High agreement but low kappa: II Resolving the paradoxes.
        J Clin Epid. 1990; 43: 551-558
        • McClure PW
        • Rothstein JM
        • Riddle DL
        Intertester reliability of clinical judgments of medial knee ligament injury.
        Phys Ther. 1989; 69: 268-275