Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Retrospective comparison and three-year follow-up of two conservative treatment programs

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Forty-eight patients with symptomatic back pain secondary to spondylolisthesis who were treated conservatively were followed for three years after initial examination to compare the outcomes of two exercise programs. The patients were divided into two groups—those doing flexion and those doing extension back strengthening exercises. All patients received instructions on posture, lifting techniques, and the use of heat for relief of symptoms. After three months, only 27% of patients who were instructed in flexion exercises had moderate or severe pain and only 32% were unable to work or had limited their work. Of the patients who were instructed in extension exercises, 67% had moderate or severe pain and 61% were unable to work or had limited their work. At three-year follow-up, only 19% of the flexion group had moderate or severe pain and 24% were unable to work or had limited their work. The respective figures for the extension group were 67% and 61%. The overall recovery rate after three months was 58% for the flexion group and 6% for the extension group. At three years these figures improved to 62% for the flexion group and dropped to 0% for the extension group. The literature is scarce regarding the applicability of conservative treatment programs for lumbar spondylolisthesis. On the basis of our findings, we suggest that if a conservative treatment program is elected, back flexion or isometric back strengthening exercises should be considered. The three-year follow-up data presented here lend support to this point of view.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Eingorn D
        • Pizzutillo PD
        Pars interarticularis fusion of multiple levels of lumbar spondylolysis.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 250-252
        • Feffer HL
        • Wiesel SW
        • Cuckler JM
        • Rothman RH
        Degenerative spondylolisthesis. To fuse or not to fuse.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 287-289
        • Fredrickson BE
        • Baker D
        • McHolick WJ
        • Yuan HA
        • Lubicky JP
        Natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1984; 66: 699-707
        • Gertzbein SD
        • Seligman J
        • Holtby R
        • Chan KH
        • Kapasouri A
        • Tile M
        • Cruickshank B
        Centrode patterns and segmental instability in degenerative disc disease.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 257-261
        • Gramse RR
        • Sinaki M
        • Ilstrup DM
        Lumbar spondylolisthesis: rational approach to conservative treatment.
        in: Ed 2. Mayo Clin Proc. 55. 1980: 681-686
        • Johnson AC
        • Power TC
        Combined neurosurgical-orthopedic approach to correction of radiculopathy and instability in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
        Int Surg. 1984; 69: 345-350
        • Lowe J
        • Schachner E
        • Hirschberg E
        • Shapiro Y
        • Libson E
        Significance of bone scintigraphy in symptomatic spondylolysis.
        Spine. 1984; 9: 653-655
        • Magora A
        Conservative treatment in spondylolisthesis.
        Clin Orthop. 1976; 117: 74-79
        • Meyerding HW
        in: Ed 2. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 9. 1934: 666-671
        • Nachemson A
        Lumbar spine instability.
        in: Critical update and symposium summary. Ed 2. Spine. 10. 1985: 290-291
        • Paris SV
        Physical signs of instability.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 277-279
        • Pearcy M
        • Shepherd J
        Is there instability in spondylolisthesis?.
        Spine. 1985; 10: 175-177
        • Ravichandran G
        Reevaluation of radiological signs in spondylolisthesis.
        CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1983; 20: 175-190
        • Schlegel K-F
        • Pon A
        Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in spondylolisthesis.
        Clin Orthop. 1985; 193: 115-119
        • Speck GR
        • McCall IW
        • O'Brien JP
        Spondylolisthesis: angle of kyphosis.
        Spine. 1984; 9: 659-660