Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 80, Issue 5 , Pages 540-544, May 1999

Electromyographic effects of foot orthotics on selected lower extremity muscles during running☆☆☆★★★

  • Deborah A. Nawoczenski, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Deborah A. Nawoczenski, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Ithaca College-University of Rochester campus, 300 E. River Road, Suite 1–102, Rochester, NY 14623.
    • Department of Physical Therapy, Ithaca College-University of Rochester campus, Rochester, NY, USA
    • ,
  • Paula M. Ludewig, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Received 17 August 1998; accepted 12 November 1998.

Article Outline

Abstract 

Objective: To study the effects of foot orthotics on the mean electromyographic amplitude of proximal and distal lower extremity muscle groups during the first 50% of the stance phase during treadmill running.

Design: Repeated measures.

Setting: Subjects were recruited from the general community.

Participants: Twelve recreational runners who were symptomatic for lower extremity pain. Clinical and radiographic findings confirmed the presence of structural malalignment of the foot.

Intervention: Semirigid orthotics were fabricated for each subject, and like footwear provided.

Main Outcome Measures: Surface electromyogram activity from the tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and biceps femoris was collected during treadmill running at self-selected speeds for orthotic and nonorthotic conditions. Root mean square values were averaged across 10 cycles, normalized to time and expressed as a percentage of the nonorthotic condition.

Results: Paired t test results showed statistically significant changes (p < .05) for the biceps femoris (−11.1%) and tibialis anterior (+37.5%) muscle groups during the orthotic condition. Electromyographic activity in the medial gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis with orthotic use was not significantly different from the nonorthotic condition.

Conclusion: Although subjects' electromyographic responses to orthotic use were highly individualized, the findings of this study may enhance our understanding of muscle activity changes associated with positive outcomes from orthotic use.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. James S, Jones D. Biomechanical aspects of distance running injuries. In:  Cavanagh PR editors. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Books; 1990;p. 249–269
  2. Simkin A, Leicher I, Giladi M, Stein M, Milgrom C. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle. 1989;10:25–29
  3. Cowan DN, Jones BH, Robinson JR. Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:773–777
  4. Smith L, Clarke T, Hamill C, Santopietro F. The effects of soft and semi-rigid orthoses upon rearfoot movement in running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1986;76:227–233
  5. Apkarian J, Naumann S, Cairns B. A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. J Biomech. 1989;22:143–155
  6. Lockard MA. Foot orthoses. Phys Ther. 1988;68:1866–1873
  7. D'Ambrosia R. Orthotic devices in running injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1985;4:611–617
  8. Gross M, Davlin L, Evanski M. Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:409–412
  9. Donatelli R, Hurlbert C, Conaway D, St. Pierre R. Biomechanical foot orthotics: a retrospective study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;10:205–212
  10. McCulloch M, Brunt D, Vanderlinden D. The effect of foot orthotics and gait velocity on lower limb kinematics and temporal events of stance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17:2–10
  11. Novick A, Kelley D. Position and movement changes of the foot with orthotic intervention during the loading response of gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;11:301–312
  12. Rodgers MM, Leveau B. Effectiveness of foot orthotic devices used to modify pronation in runners. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1982;4:86–90
  13. Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. The effect of soft orthotics on three-dimensional lower limb kinematics during walking and running. Phys Ther. 1994;74:836–844
  14. Nawoczenski DA, Cook TM, Saltzman CL. The effect of foot orthotics on three-dimensional kinematics of the leg and rearfoot during running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21:317–327
  15. Nigg BM, Khan A, Fisher V, Stefanyshyn D. Effect of shoe insert construction on foot and leg movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:550–555
  16. Tomaro J, Burdett RG. The effects of foot orthotics on the EMG activity of selected leg muscles during gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18:532–536
  17. Simkin A, Leichter I. Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot—a biomechanical model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28:149–152
  18. Komi PV, Gollhofer A, Schmidtbleicher D, Frick U. Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach. Int J Sports Med. 1987;8:196–202
  19. Elliott BC, Blanksby BA. The synchronization of muscle activity and body segment movements during a running cycle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1979;11:322–327
  20. McClay IS, Lake MJ, Cavanagh PR. Muscle activity in running. In:  Cavanagh PR editors. Biomechanics of distance running. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Books; 1990;p. 249–269
  21. Engsberg JR, Andrews JG. Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/ talocrual joint during running support. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;19:275–284
  22. Areblad M, Nigg B, Ekstrand J, Olsson K, Ekstrom H. Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. J Biomech. 1990;23:933–940
  23. Clarke TE, Frederick E, Hamill C. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15:376–381
  24. Brand PW, Coleman WC. A standard for dorsal-plantar and lateral radiographic projections of the feet. Orthopedics. 1987;10:117–120
  25. Nawoczenski DA, Saltzman CL, Cook TM. The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rear foot. Phys Ther. 1998;78:404–416
  26. Zipp P. Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1982;50:41–54
  27. Eng JJ, Pierrynowski MR. Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther. 1993;73:62–69
  28. MacIntyre DL, Robertson GE. Quadriceps muscle activity in women runners with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:10–14
  29. Taunton J, Clement D, Smart G. A triplanar electrogoniometric investigation of running mechanics in runners with compensatory overpronation. Can J Appl Sports Sci. 1985;10:104–115

☆ This work was initiated while both authors were affiliated with the Graduate Program in Physical Therapy at The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.

☆☆ Supported in part by the Foundation for Physical Therapy.

★ Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Physical Therapy Association, June 1993, Cincinnati, OH.

★★ No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(99)90196-X

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 80, Issue 5 , Pages 540-544, May 1999

Article Tools