Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 78, Issue 11 , Pages 1231-1236, November 1997

Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: Effects on function and spasticity☆☆

  • Shelley A. Sharp, MSc
  • ,
  • Brenda J. Brouwer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Brenda J. Brouwer, PhD, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Louise D. Acton Building, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.

School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Received 13 January 1997; accepted 24 March 1997.

Abstract 

Purpose: To determine whether isokinetic training can improve the strength of the hemiparetic knee musculature, functional mobility, and physical activity and to evaluate its effect on spasticity in long-term stroke survivors.

Design: Nonrandomized self-controlled trial.

Subjects: A volunteer sample of 15 community-dwelling stroke survivors of at least 6 months.

Intervention: A 6-week (3 days/week, 40 minutes/day) program consisting of warm-up, stretches, reciprocal knee extension and flexion isokinetic strengthening, and cool-down for the paretic limb.

Main Outcome Measures: Peak isokinetic hamstring and quadriceps torque, quadriceps spasticity, gait velocity, timed Up and Go, timed stair climb, and the Human Activity Profile (HAP) scores were recorded at baseline, after training, and 4 weeks after training cessation (follow-up).

Results: Paretic muscle strength improved after training (p < .05) while tone remained consistent (p > .87). Gait velocity increased after training (p < .05) and at follow-up (p < .05). Changes in stair climbing and timed Up and Go were not significant (p > .37; p > .91), although subjects perceived gains in their physical abilities at follow-up (p < .01).

Conclusions: Gains in strength and gait velocity without concomitant increases in muscle tone are possible after a shortterm strengthening program for stroke survivors. The psychological benefit associated with physical activity is significant.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

 Supported in part by grant ST2714 from the the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

☆☆ No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(97)90337-3

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 78, Issue 11 , Pages 1231-1236, November 1997