Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 78, Issue 11 , Pages 1204-1210, November 1997

Kinematics of the elbow during wheelchair propulsion: A comparison of two wheelchairs and two stroking techniques☆☆

  • Andrew Rudins, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Edward R. Laskowski, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Edward R. Laskowski, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Eric S. Growney, BS

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas D. Cahalan, PT

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Kai-Nan An, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA

Received 8 October 1996; accepted 17 March 1997.

Abstract 

Objective: The kinematics of the elbow joint were studied for two types of wheelchairs and during two types of propulsive strokes.

Participants: Ten serially selected healthy volunteers propelled a standard and a lightweight wheelchair on a roller system with both circular and pumping strokes.

Design: Kinematic data for the wheelchair and the upper extremity were collected by an optical tracking system. These kinematic descriptors were subsequently time-normalized with a spline algorithm to provide a graphic description of the wheelchair strokes.

Main Outcome Measures: Thirteen discrete variables were compared for the two chairs and the two propulsive strokes.

Results: Total elbow motion ranged from 60.9° of flexion to 5.2° of extension. Maximal elbow flexion velocity ranged from 515.4° to 572.8° per second. Kinematic differences between the two wheelchairs were minimal, with a trend for 8.3° to 5.2° more elbow flexion in the lightweight wheelchair (p < .05), depending on the stroke used. With the use of any one chair, the style of the stroke had no significant effect on elbow kinematics, but the use of a pumping stroke did decrease propulsion arc by 12° to 14° (p < .05).

Conclusion: No major differences regarding elbow kinematics were seen between the two types of wheelchairs. The pumping-stroke technique resulted in a shortened handrim contact arc.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

 Supported by Research Grant AR26287 from the National Institutes of Health.

☆☆ No commercial party having a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(97)90333-6

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 78, Issue 11 , Pages 1204-1210, November 1997