Volume 90, Issue 12 , Pages 1989-1996, December 2009
Circuit-Based Rehabilitation Improves Gait Endurance but Not Usual Walking Activity in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Mudge S, Barber PA, Stott NS. Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walking activity in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Objective
To determine whether circuit-based rehabilitation would increase the amount and rate that individuals with stroke walk in their usual environments.
Design
Single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Rehabilitation clinic.
Participants
Sixty participants with a residual gait deficit at least 6 months after stroke originally enrolled in the study. Two withdrew in the initial phase, leaving 58 participants (median age, 71.5y; range, 39.0–89.0y) who were randomized to the 2 intervention groups.
Interventions
The exercise group had 12 sessions of clinic-based rehabilitation delivered in a circuit class designed to improve walking. The control group received a comparable duration of group social and educational classes.
Main Outcome Measures
Usual walking performance was assessed using the StepWatch Activity Monitor. Clinical tests were gait speed (timed 10-meter walk) and endurance (six-minute walk test [6MWT]), confidence (Activities-Based Confidence Scale), self-reported mobility (Rivermead Mobility Index [RMI]), and self-reported physical activity (Physical Activity and Disability Scale).
Results
Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the exercise group showed a significantly greater distance for the 6MWT than the control group immediately after the intervention (P=.030) but that this effect was not retained 3 months later. There were no changes in the StepWatch measures of usual walking performance for either group. The exercise and control groups had significantly different gait speed (P=.038) and scores on the RMI (P=.025) at the 3-month follow-up. These differences represented a greater decline in the control group compared with the exercise group for both outcome measures.
Conclusions
Circuit-based rehabilitation leads to improvements in gait endurance but does not change the amount or rate of walking performance in usual environments. Clinical gains made by the exercise group were lost 3 months later. Future studies should consider whether rehabilitation needs to occur in usual environments to improve walking performance.
Key Words: Rehabilitation, Stroke, Walking
Abbreviations: ABC, Activities-Specific Balance and Confidence Scale, 6MWT, six-minute walk test, PADS, Physical Activity and Disability Scale, RMI, Rivermead Mobility Index
Supported by the Neurological Foundation, the New Zealand Society of Physiotherapists' Scholarship Fund, and the Health Research Council. The research was conducted during tenure of a Clinical Research Training Fellowship from the Health Research Council of New Zealand.
Trial registration number: ACTRN12607000081415 on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry at http://www.anzctr.org.au/default.aspx.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(09)00680-7
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.015
© 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 90, Issue 12 , Pages 1989-1996, December 2009
