Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 11 , Pages 1821-1828, November 2009

Association of Dynamic Joint Power With Functional Limitations in Older Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Presented to the Association of Academic Physiatrists, 2008, Anaheim, CA, and the American Geriatrics Society, Washington, DC.

  • Neil A. Segal, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Neil A. Segal, MD, MS, Dept of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Dr, 0728 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242-1088
  • ,
  • H. John Yack, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Graduate Program in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • ,
  • Morgan Brubaker, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • ,
  • James C. Torner, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
  • ,
  • Robert Wallace, MS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Abstract 

Segal NA, Yack HJ, Brubaker M, Torner JC, Wallace R. Association of dynamic joint power with functional limitations in older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Objectives

To determine which lower-limb joint moments and powers characterize the level of gait performance of older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Design

Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting

University motion analysis laboratory.

Participants

Community-dwelling adults (N=60; 27 men, 33 women; age 50–79y) with symptomatic knee OA.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Physical function was measured using the long-distance corridor walk, the Short Physical Performance Battery, and the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI Function). Joint moments and power were estimated using an inverse dynamics solution after 3-dimensional computerized motion analysis.

Results

Subjects aged 64.2±7.4 years were recruited. Ranges (mean ± SD) for the 400-m walk time and the LLFDI Advanced Lower-Limb Function score were 215.3 to 536.8 (304.1±62.3) seconds and 31.5 to 100 (57.0±14.9) points, respectively. In women, hip abductor moment (loading response), hip abductor power (midstance), eccentric hamstring moment (terminal stance), and power (terminal swing) accounted for 41%, 31%, 14%, and 48% of the variance in the 400-m walk time, respectively (model R2=.61, P<.003). In men, plantar flexor and hip flexor power (preswing) accounted for 19% and 24% of the variance in the 400-m walk time, respectively (model R2=.32, P=.025).

Conclusions

There is evidence that men and women with higher mobility function tend to rely more on an ankle strategy rather than a hip strategy for gait. In higher functioning men, higher knee extensor and flexor strength may contribute to an ankle strategy, whereas hip abductor weakness may bias women with lower mobility function to minimize loading across the knee via use of a hip strategy. These parameters may serve as foci for rehabilitation interventions aimed at reducing mobility limitations.

Key Words: Aging, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations: LLFDI, Late Life Function and Disability Instrument, MOST, Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, OA, osteoarthritis, SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery, WOMAC, Western Ontario McMasters Knee Osteoarthritis Index

 

 Supported by a 2006 Dennis W. Jahnigen Career Development Scholars Award through the American Geriatrics Society and by the following NIH/NIA grants: U01-AG-18832, U01-AG-18820, U01-AG-18947, and U01-AG-19069.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00644-3

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.009

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 11 , Pages 1821-1828, November 2009