Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 11, Supplement , Pages S22-S35 , November 2009

Difficult to Measure Constructs: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Concerning Participation and Environmental Factors

Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Washington, DC, October 3–7, 2007; and as the Norington Lecture to the Annual Meeting of the Autralasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Queenstown, New Zealand, July 24, 2009.

  • Gale Whiteneck, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Gale Whiteneck, PhD, Craig Hospital, Dept of Research, 3425 S Clarkson St, Englewood, CO 80113
    • ,
  • Marcel P. Dijkers, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

References 

  1. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001;
  2. Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present and future. In:  Field MJ,  Jette AM,  Martin L editor. Workshop on disability in America: a new look—summary and background papers. Washington (DC): National Academies Pr; 2006;p. 50–66
  3. Institute of Medicine. The future of disability in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Pr; 2007;
  4. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980;
  5. Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. In press.
  6. Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT. Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct?. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35:145–149
  7. Simeonsson RJ, Leonardi M, Lollar D, Bjorck-Akesson E, Hollenweger J, Martinuzzi A. Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to measure childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:602–610
  8. Nordenfelt L. Action theory, disability and ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1075–1079
  9. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:577–587
  10. Barral C. ICF: internal and external obstacles to implementation. http://www.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/Catherine_Barral.pdf2004;Accessed July 29, 2009
  11. Schuntermann MF. The implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Germany: experiences and problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28:93–102
  12. Chapireau F. The environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. J Appl Res Intell Disabil. 2005;18:305–311
  13. Reed GM, Lux JB, Bufka LF, et al. Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:122–131
  14. Okochi J, Utsunomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:46
  15. Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:2335–2345
  16. Marino RJ. Domains of outcomes in spinal cord injury for clinical trials to improve neurological function. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:113–122
  17. Institute of Medicine. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington (DC): National Academy Pr; 1991;
  18. Institute of Medicine. Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington (DC): National Academy Pr; 1997;
  19. Nagi SZ. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976;54:439–467
  20. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In:  Sussman MB editors. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington (DC): American Sociological Association; 1965;p. 100–113
  21. Parsons T. The social system. New York: Free Pr; 1951;
  22. Nagi S. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Institute of Medicine, editor. Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington (DC): National Academy Pr; 1991;p. 316–332
  23. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–526
  24. Mellick D, Walker N, Brooks CA, Whiteneck G. Incorporating the cognitive independence domain into CHART. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas. 1999;3:12–21
  25. Brown M, Dijkers M, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H. Participation Objective, Participation Subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19:459–481
  26. WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the world health organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res. 1993;2:153–159
  27. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale Univ Pr; 1987;
  28. Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine, IV: the development of clinimetrics. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:843–848
  29. Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953;32:260–267
  30. Lewin K. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969;
  31. Barker RG. Ecological psychology; concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford Univ Pr; 1968;
  32. Wright BA. Physical disability, a psychosocial approach. 2nd ed.. New York: Harper & Row; 1983;
  33. Masala C, Petretto DR. From disablement to enablement: conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1233–1244
  34. Oliver M. Understanding disability: from theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1996;
  35. Finkelstein V. The social model of disability repossessed. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/finkelstein/soc%20mod%20repossessed.pdf2001;Accessed March 16, 2009
  36. Oliver M, Barnes C. Disabled people and social policy: from exclusion to inclusion. Harlow: Longman; 1998;
  37. Shakespeare T. Redefining the disability problem. Crit Publ Health. 1995;6:4–8
  38. Fougeyrollas P. Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contributions relating to ICIDH and social participation of people with functional differences. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:145–153
  39. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Boschen KA. Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Rehabil. 2002;7:1–16
  40. Pfeiffer D. The categorization and control of people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:106–107
  41. Pfeiffer D. The problem of disability definition: again. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21:392–395
  42. Hahn H. Reconceptualizing disability: a political science perspective. Rehabil Lit. 1984;45:362–365374
  43. Fougeyrollas P, Cloutier R, Bergeron H, Coté J, Coté M, St Michel G. Revision of the Quebec Classification: Handicap Creation Process. Quebec: International Network on the Disability Creation Process; 1997;
  44. Jelsma J. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1–12
  45. Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustun B. The role of environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:588–595
  46. Jonsson G, Ekholm J, Schult ML. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health environmental factors as facilitators or barriers used in describing personal and social networks: a pilot study of adults with cerebral palsy. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31:119–129
  47. Stokols D. The paradox of environmental psychology. Am Psychol. 1995;50:821–837
  48. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Pr; 1979;
  49. Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr TD. Comparing the Disability Creation Process and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health models. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:Spec No:233-42
  50. Steinfeld E, Schroeder S, Duncan J, Faste R, Chollet D, Bishop M. Access to the built environment: a review of the literature. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 1979;
  51. Jensen G, Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Theoretical understanding and methodological challenges in accessibility assessments, focusing the environmental component: an example from travel chains in urban public bus transport. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:231–242
  52. Iwarsson S. The housing enabler: an objective tool for assessing accessibility. Br J Occup Ther. 1999;62:491–497
  53. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. Development of a novel instrument for occupational therapy assessment of the physical environment in the home—a methodologic study on “the enabler.”. Occup Ther J Res. 1996;16:227–244
  54. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å. Housing standards, environmental barriers in the home, and subjective general apprehension of housing situation among the rural elderly. Scan J Occup Ther. 1996;3:52–61
  55. Yuker HE, Block JR, Campbell WJ. A scale to measure attitudes toward disabled persons. Albertson: Human Resource Center; 1960;Human Resource study #5
  56. Antonak RF. Development and psychometric analysis of the scale of attitudes toward disabled persons. J Appl Rehabil Couns. 1982;13:22–29
  57. Gething L, Wheeler B. The interaction with disabled persons scale: a new Australian instrument to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities. Aust J Psychol. 1992;44:75–82
  58. Roach MJ. Community social structure as an indicator of social integration and its effect on quality of life for persons with a spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002;7:101–111
  59. Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Tate D, et al. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1501–1506
  60. Gontkovsky ST, Sherer M, Nick TG, Nakase-Thompson R, Yablon SA. Effect of urbanicity of residence on TBI outcome at one year post-injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20:701–709
  61. Stark S, Hollingsworth HH, Morgan KA, Gray DB. Development of a measure of receptivity of the physical environment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:123–137
  62. Wright JG, Feinstein AR. A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1201–1218
  63. Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J Royal Stat Soc Series A. 2002;165:233–253
  64. Fayers PM, Hand DJ, Bjordal K, Groenvold M. Causal indicators in quality of life research. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:393–406
  65. Feinstein AR. Multi-item “instruments” vs Virginia Apgar's principles of clinimetrics. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:125–128
  66. Stark SL, Hollingsworth H, Morgan K, Chang M, Gray DB. The interrater reliability of the Community Health Environment Checklist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:2218–2219
  67. Keysor J, Jette A, Haley S. Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:37–44
  68. Keysor JJ, Jette AM, Coster W, Bettger JP, Haley SM. Association of environmental factors with levels of home and community participation in an adult rehabilitation cohort. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1566–1575
  69. Whiteneck GG, Brooks CA, Melick D. The creation of the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF). Englewood Cliffs: Craig Hospital; 1999;
  70. Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, Brooks CA, Charlifue SB, Gerhart KA. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1324–1335
  71. In:  Fougeyrollas P,  Noreau L,  Michel G,  Boschen K editor. Measure of the Quality of Environment (MQE) Version 2. Charles: INDCP-CP; 1999;
  72. Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:559–569
  73. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark S, Morgan KA. A subjective measure of environmental facilitators and barriers to participation for people with mobility limitations. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:434–457
  74. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:189–197
  75. Lysack C, Komanecky M, Kabel A, Cross K, Neufeld S. Environmental factors and their role in community integration after spinal cord injury. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:243–254
  76. Dijkers MP, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, Weitzenkamp D, Whiteneck GG. A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:351–362
  77. Keysor JJ. How does the environment influent disability? (examining the evidence). In:  Field MJ,  Jette AM,  Martin L editor. Workshop on disability in America: a new look—summary and background papers. Washington (DC): National Academies Pr; 2006;p. 88–100
  78. Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Mellick D, Harrison-Felix C. The relationship among disability, participation, and environmental factors (Presentation at the American Public Health Association Meeting). http://www.apha.confex.com/apha/128am/techprogram/paper_12152.htm2000;Accessed October 13, 2009
  79. Conroy L, McKenna K. Vocational outcome following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:624–633
  80. Wang PP, Badley EM, Gignac M. Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:135–140
  81. Mann WC, Ottenbacher KJ, Fraas L, Tomita M, Granger CV. Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:210–217
  82. Samuelsson KA, Tropp H, Nylander E, Gerdle B. The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:65–74
  83. Foster L, Brown R, Phillips B, Schore J, Carlson BL. Improving the quality of Medicaid personal assistance through consumer direction. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;(Suppl Web Exclusives):W3-162-75
  84. Liang H, Tomey K, Chen D, Savar NL, Rimmer JH, Braunschweig CL. Objective measures of neighborhood environment and self-reported physical activity in spinal cord injured men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1468–1473
  85. Mojtahedi MC, Boblick P, Rimmer JH, Rowland JL, Jones RA, Braunschweig CL. Environmental barriers to and availability of healthy foods for people with mobility disabilities living in urban and suburban neighborhoods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:2174–2179
  86. Kendig H. Directions in environmental gerontology: a multidisciplinary field. Gerontologist. 2003;43:611–615
  87. In:  Friedman SL,  Wachs TD editor. Measuring environment across the life span: emerging methods and concepts. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1999;
  88. Garling T. Introduction—conceptualization of human environments. J Environ Psychol. 1998;18:69–73
  89. Nuckols JR, Ward MH, Jarup L. Using geographic information systems for exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1007–1015
  90. Spivock M, Gauvin L, Riva M, Brodeur JM. Promoting active living among people with physical disabilities evidence for neighborhood-level buoys. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:291–298
  91. Graves BA. Integrative literature review: a review of literature related to geographical information systems, healthcare access, and health outcomes. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008;5:11
  92. Edelman LS. Using geographic information systems in injury research. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39:306–311
  93. Clarke P, Ailshire JA, Bader M, Morenoff JD, House JS. Mobility disability and the urban built environment. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:506–513

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, U.S. Department of Education, to Craig Hospital (grant nos. H133N060005 and H133A070022), and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (grant nos. H133B040033 and H133N060027).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

 Reprints are not be available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00610-8

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.009

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 11, Supplement , Pages S22-S35 , November 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution