Journal Home
Search for

Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 1523-1531 (September 2009)


View previous. 14 of 35 View next.

Models for Integrating Rehabilitation and Primary Care: A Scoping Study

Mary Ann McColl, PhD, MTSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Samuel Shortt, MD, PhDd, Marshall Godwin, MD, MScb, Karen Smith, MDa, Kirby Rowe, BScc, Patti O'Brien, MSca, Catherine Donnelly, MSca

Abstract 

McColl MA, Shortt S, Godwin M, Smith K, Rowe K, O'Brien P, Donnelly C. Models for integrating rehabilitation and primary care: a scoping study.

Objective

To describe the scope and breadth of knowledge currently available regarding the integration of rehabilitation and primary care services.

Data Sources

Peer-reviewed journals were searched using CINAHL, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews for the years 1995 through 2007. This process identified 172 items.

Study Selection

To be considered for the subsequent review, the article had to describe a service delivery program that offered primary care and rehabilitation, or services specifically designed for people with chronic conditions/disabilities. Further, it had to be available in English or French. No methodological limitations were applied to screen for levels of evidence.

Data Extraction

Based on these criteria, 38 articles remained that pertained to both primary care and rehabilitation. These were reviewed, sorted, and categorized to discover commonalities and differences among the approaches used to integrating rehabilitation into primary care.

Data Synthesis

In consultation with the team of investigators, it was determined that there were 6 different models for providing primary health care and rehabilitation services in an integrated approach: clinic, outreach, self-management, community-based rehabilitation, shared care, and case management. In addition, a number of themes were identified across models that may act as either supports or impediments to the integration of rehabilitation services into primary care settings: team approach, interprofessional trust, leadership, communication, compensation, accountability, referrals, and population-based approach.

Conclusions

Rehabilitation providers interested in working in the primary care sector may be assisted in conceptualizing the benefits that they bring to the setting by considering these models and issues.

List of AbbreviationCBR, community-based rehabilitation

a Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

b Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada

c Canadian Paraplegic Association-Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

d Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Mary Ann McColl, PhD, MTS, Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen's University, Abramsky Hall, 3rd Fl, Kingston, ON, Canada

 Supported by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Rehabilitation Research and Advisory Network, and Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00394-3

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.017


View previous. 14 of 35 View next.