Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 10 , Pages 1668-1671, October 2009

Hydrophilic Catheters Versus Noncoated Catheters for Reducing the Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Diana D. Cardenas, MD, MHA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to Diana D. Cardenas, MD, MHA, Dept of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th St, Room 958, C-206, Miami, FL 33136
  • ,
  • Jeanne M. Hoffman, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Abstract 

Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM. Hydrophilic catheters versus noncoated catheters for reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To test the hypotheses that hydrophilic catheters reduce the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs) in persons with spinal cord injury on self–intermittent catheterization (IC).

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Community.

Participants

Subjects (N=56) on IC with recurrent UTIs and who met eligibility criteria.

Intervention

Use of hydrophilic catheters for IC.

Main Outcome Measure

Symptomatic UTIs treated with antibiotics.

Results

Of the 56 subjects enrolled, 45 completed the study (22 in the treatment group, 23 in the control group). There were no significant differences in demographics, including sex, between the treatment group and the controls except for more tetraplegic subjects in the control group (P<.05). Seventy-one percent of the treatment group and 52% of the control group were men. The total number of symptomatic UTIs treated with antibiotics was significantly smaller in the treatment group than in the control group (P<.05). Seventy percent of the control group had at least 1 antibiotic treatment episode compared with only 50% of those with the hydrophilic catheter (P=.18). There was no significant difference in the incidence of bacteriuria or symptomatic UTIs among the 2 groups. Level of injury and years with injury were unrelated to symptomatic UTIs, but being female increased the risk of UTIs (P<.01).

Conclusions

Although there was no difference in the number of symptomatic UTIs in the 2 groups, hydrophilic catheter usage was associated with reduced numbers of treated UTIs as compared with standard nonhydrophilic catheters in persons with spinal cord injury who used self-IC; however, the study is limited by a small sample size. Women on self-IC were more likely to develop UTIs regardless of the catheter type, suggesting that the benefits of the lubrication may be more important in men.

Key Words: Rehabilitation, Spinal cord injuries, Urinary catheterization, Urinary tract infections

List of Abbreviations: IC, intermittent catheterization, SCI, spinal cord injury, UTI, urinary tract infection

 

 Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, United States Department of Education, Washington, DC (grant no. H133N000003).

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

 Reprints are not available from the author.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00374-8

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.010

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 10 , Pages 1668-1671, October 2009