« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 10
, Pages 1692-1698
, October 2009
Observation of Amounts of Movement Practice Provided During Stroke Rehabilitation
References
- . Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:3321–3325
- . Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:785–807
- . Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794
- . Motor adaptation to single force pulses: sensitive to direction but insensitive to within-movement pulse placement and magnitude. J Neurophysiol. 2006;96:710–720
- . Explicit information interferes with implicit motor learning of both continuous and discrete movement tasks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:46–57discussion 58-49
- . Early locomotor training with clonidine in spinal cats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:392–409
- . Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1329–1340
- . Locomotor ability in spinal rats is dependent on the amount of activity imposed on the hindlimbs during treadmill training. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1000–1012
- . Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:S225–S239
- . Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats. Synapse. 2004;54:187–199
- Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the excite randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296:2095–2104
- . Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823–830
- . The relation between therapy intensity and outcomes of rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:373–379
- . Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196
- . The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke—a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985;16:928–931
- . A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:260–266
- . Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004;35:1005–1009
- . Not all stroke units are the same: a comparison of physical activity patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway. Stroke. 2008;39:2059–2065
- . Circuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:955–963
- . Routine physiotherapy does not induce a cardiorespiratory training effect post-stroke, regardless of walking ability. Physiother Res Int. 2006;11:219–227
- . Stroke rehabilitation: does the therapy area provide a physical challenge?. Aust J Physiother. 1999;45:33–38
- . Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient day treatment for people with hemiparesis. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:1–8
- . Exercise and training to optimize functional motor performance in stroke: driving neural reorganization?. Neural Plast. 2001;8:121–129
- . Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. London, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Stroke Network; 2008;
- Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:e98–e99[epub ahead of print]
- Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:137–152
- Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66:484–493
- . Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the “black box” of inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1901–1908
- . Occupational therapy: practice skills for physical dysfunction. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001;
- . The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18
- . Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24:1000–1019
- . Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:14–20
- . The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833–862
- . Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:293–312
- . Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:S101–S114
- . Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53:576–579
- . The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, 1: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31
- . Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:56–63
Pilot funding for development and distribution of training materials was provided by the Research Division of the Program in Physical Therapy at Washington University. Salary support for C.E.L. during this project was provided by National Institutes of Health (grant no. HD047669). Funding from the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Foundation, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia, and the North Growth Foundation provided salary support for data collection at University of British Columbia.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
PII: S0003-9993(09)00353-0
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.005
© 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 10
, Pages 1692-1698
, October 2009
