« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8
, Pages
1379-1388
, August 2009
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Cycling With and Without Electrical Stimulation on Cardiorespiratory and Vascular Health in Children With Spinal Cord Injury
-
(A) V̇o2 values and (B) average percent change in V̇o2 per group. There were no differences between groups in uptake values over time (P=.588, power=.133); however, the FESC group showed a significant
(A) V̇o2 values and (B) average percent change in V̇o2 per group. There were no differences between groups in uptake values over time (P=.588, power=.133); however, the FESC group showed a significant increase in average percent change as compared with the passive cycling group (P=.033, power=.651) with Bonferroni post hoc testing showing that the FESC group had a greater positive percent change than did the passive cycling group (P=.035) (FESC vs ES, P=1.00; PC vs ES, P=.185). In examining baseline and 6-month values within each group, the changes did not reach statistical significance (FESC, P=.056; PC, P=.095; ES, P=.23). Abbreviations: ES, electrical stimulation; FESC, functional electrical stimulation cycling; PC, passive cycling.
-
Resting heart rate values per group. There were no changes in resting heart rate over time for any group (P=.991, power=.051). One-tailed paired t tests also showed no changes within each group (FESC,Resting heart rate values per group. There were no changes in resting heart rate over time for any group (P=.991, power=.051). One-tailed paired t tests also showed no changes within each group (FESC, P=.12; PC, P=.16; ES, P=.18). The slight decline noted may be because of children being 6 months older. Abbreviations: ES, electrical stimulation; FESC, functional electrical stimulation cycling; PC, passive cycling.
-
FVC per group. There were no differences between groups over time for FVC when comparing baseline and 6-month values (P=.637, power=.098). One-tailed paired t tests also showed no changes within eachFVC per group. There were no differences between groups over time for FVC when comparing baseline and 6-month values (P=.637, power=.098). One-tailed paired t tests also showed no changes within each group (FESC, P=.50; PC, P=.45; ES, P=.10). Abbreviations: ES, electrical stimulation; FESC, functional electrical stimulation cycling; PC, passive cycling.
Supported by the Shriners Hospitals for Children (grant no. 8540).
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.
Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT00245726.
PII: S0003-9993(09)00314-1
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.018
© 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8
, Pages
1379-1388
, August 2009
