« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8
, Pages
1340-1348
, August 2009
Clinical Interpretation of Computerized Adaptive Test–Generated Outcome Measures in Patients With Knee Impairments
-
SE and percent of patients associated with each point estimate score at intake. Abbreviations: FS score, FS score estimated by the knee CAT; Percent, percentage of patients measured; SE, SE of the est
SE and percent of patients associated with each point estimate score at intake. Abbreviations: FS score, FS score estimated by the knee CAT; Percent, percentage of patients measured; SE, SE of the estimate associated with each point estimate.
-
Clinical example. The patient's responses are circled on the figure: lighter gray circles identify the responses at intake, and darker gray circles identify responses at discharge. Notation: 1, extremClinical example. The patient's responses are circled on the figure: lighter gray circles identify the responses at intake, and darker gray circles identify responses at discharge. Notation: 1, extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity; 2, quite a bit of difficulty; 3, moderate difficulty; 4, a little bit of difficulty; 5, no difficulty; the “:” is the threshold cut-score between contiguous responses per item. Abbreviation: FSCH, FS discharge–FS admission.
A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on one or more of the authors.
PII: S0003-9993(09)00286-X
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.008
© 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8
, Pages
1340-1348
, August 2009
