Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8 , Pages 1340-1348, August 2009

Clinical Interpretation of Computerized Adaptive Test–Generated Outcome Measures in Patients With Knee Impairments

  • Ying-Chih Wang, OTR, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes Inc, Knoxville, TN
    • Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to Ying-Chih Wang, OTR, PhD, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Sensory Motor Performance Program, 345 E Superior, Ste 1312, Chicago, IL, 60611
  • ,
  • Dennis L. Hart, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes Inc, Knoxville, TN
  • ,
  • Paul W. Stratford, PT, MS

      Affiliations

    • School of Rehabilitation Science and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Jerome E. Mioduski, MS

      Affiliations

    • Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes Inc, Knoxville, TN

Abstract 

Wang Y-C, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Clinical interpretation of computerized adaptive test–generated outcome measures in patients with knee impairments.

Objective

To describe meaningful interpretations of functional status (FS) outcomes measures estimated using a body-part specific computerized adaptive test (CAT).

Design

A prospective observational cohort study.

Setting

Outpatient physical therapy clinics (291 clinics) in 30 U.S. states.

Participants

Sample of 21,896 patients with knee impairments receiving outpatient physical therapy.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

FS estimated using CAT administration.

Results

We investigated 4 approaches to clinically meaningful interpretations of outcomes data: (1) 95% confidence interval for each score estimate, (2) percentile rank of FS scores, (3) responsiveness, and (4) functional staging. Overall, precision of a single score was estimated by FS score ±5. Based on score distribution, percentile ranks at 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles corresponded to intake FS scores of 33, 42, and 51 and discharge FS scores of 51, 61, and 74, respectively. Results showed that 9 or higher FS change units represented statistically and clinically important improvement. Patients were classified into 6 hierarchical levels of FS using functional staging.

Conclusions

Results suggest how CAT-generated outcomes measures can be interpreted to assist clinicians and patients during rehabilitation.

Key Word: Rehabilitation

List of Abbreviations: CAT, computerized adaptive test, CI, confidence interval, FS, functional status, GROC, Global Rating of Change, IRT, item response theory, LEFS, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, MCII, minimal clinically important improvement, MDC90, 90% confidence interval of the minimal detectable change, MDC95, 95% confidence interval of the minimal detectable change, PRO, patient-reported outcome, RCI, reliable change index, ROC, receiver operating characteristic, RSM, Rating Scale Model

 

 A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on one or more of the authors.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00286-X

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.008

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 8 , Pages 1340-1348, August 2009