Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 9 , Pages 1469-1477 , September 2009

Validation of the Revised Quick Cognitive Screening Test

Presented to the Canadian Colloquium on Dementia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 18–20, 2007.

  • C. Charles Mate-Kole, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to C. Charles Mate-Kole, PhD, Dept of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley St, New Britain, CT 06050
  • ,
  • James Conway, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
  • ,
  • Katherine Catayong, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
    • Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, The Institute of Living, Hartford, CT
  • ,
  • Rachel Bieu, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
    • Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, The Institute of Living, Hartford, CT
  • ,
  • Naa Amerley Sackey, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health, Drexel University, PA
  • ,
  • Rebecca Wood, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
  • ,
  • Robert Fellows, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT

References 

  1. Elon R, Phillips C, Loome JF, Denman S, Woods A. General issues and comprehensive approach to assessment of elders. In:  Osterweil D,  Brummel-Smith K,  Beck JC editor. Comprehensive geriatric assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000;p. 1–39
  2. Boustani M, Peterson B, Hanson L, Harris R, Lohr K. Screening for dementia in primary care: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Int Med. 2003;138:927–937
  3. Manning L. Neuropsychological assessment of selected clinical disorders. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2001;17:79–86
  4. Lorentz WJ, Scanlan JM, Borson S. Brief screening tests for dementia. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47:723–733
  5. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;2:189–198
  6. Scanlan J, Borson AS. The Mini-Cog: receiver operating characteristics with expert and naïve raters. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16:216–222
  7. Shulman KI. Clock drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:548–561
  8. Xu G, Meyer JS, Thornby J, Chowdhury M, Quach M. Screening for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) utilizing combined mini-mental cognitive capacity examinations for identifying dementia prodromes. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17:1027–1033
  9. Kalbe E, Kessler J, Calabrese P, et al. DemTect: a new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19:136–143
  10. Ashla MM. Cognitive function, mood, and behavior assessments. In:  Osterweil D,  Brummel-Smith K,  Beck JC editor. Comprehensive geriatric assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000;p. 67–119
  11. Flicker L, Logiudice D, Carlin J, Ames D. The predictive value of dementia screening instruments in clinical populations. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr. 1997;12:203–209
  12. Borson S, Scanlan J, Chen P, Ganguli M. The Mini-Cog as a screen for dementia: validation in a population-based sample. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1451–1454
  13. Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M, Vitaliano P, Dokmak A. The Mini-Cog: a cognitive “vital signs” measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15:1021–1027
  14. Powlishta KK, Von Dras DD, Stanford A, et al. The clock drawing test is a poor screening test for very mild dementia. Neurology. 2002;59:898–903
  15. Butler M, Retzlaff P, Vanderploeg R. Brief report: neuropsychological test usage. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1991;22:510–512
  16. Anderson D, Burton B, Parker J, Godding P. A confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive capacity screening examination in a clinical sample. Int J Neurosci. 2001;111:221–233
  17. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schecter R, Schimmel H. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;50:734–739
  18. Morgan CD, Baade LE. Neuropsychological testing and assessment scales for dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;20:25–43
  19. Macneill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Screening instruments and brief batteries for assessment of dementia. In:  Lichtenberg PA editors. Handbook of assessment in clinical gerontology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1999;p. 417–441
  20. Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141:1356–1364
  21. Van Gorp WG, Marcotte TD, Sultzer D, Hinkin C, Mahler M, Cummings J. Screening for dementia: comparison of three commonly used instruments. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21:29–38
  22. Hannesdottir K, Snaedal J. A study of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) in an Icelandic elderly population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56:201–206
  23. Ihl R, Brinkmeyer J, Janner M, Kerdar MS. A comparison of ADAS and EEG in the discrimination of patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type from healthy controls. Neuropsychobiology. 2000;41:102–107
  24. Schwarb S, Koberle S, Spiegel R. The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS): an instrument for early diagnosis of dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1988;3:45–53
  25. Fischer CE. A clinician's guide to interpreting cognitive measures in clinical trials Alzheimer's disease. Can Psychiatr Assoc Bull. 2002;34:16–18
  26. Olson K. Computerized psychological test usage in APA-accredited training programs. Int J Clin Psychology. 2001;57:727–736
  27. Lopez S, Sumerall S, Ryan J. Factor structure of MicroCog in a clinical sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9:183–186
  28. Gualtieri T. CNS vital signs clinical use: reliability, validity, and standardization. 2006. https://www.cnsvs.com/images/stories/Abstracts/CNS_Vital_Signs_Reliability_and_Validity_v1.0.pdfAccessed August 19, 2006
  29. Johnson JA, Rust JO. Correlational analysis of MicroCog: assessment of cognitive functioning with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III for a clinical sample of veterans. Psychol Rep. 2003;93:1261–1266
  30. Elwood R. MicroCog: assessment of cognitive functioning. Neuropsychol Rev. 2001;11:89–100
  31. Larrabee GJ, Crook TH. Computers and memory. In:  Grant I,  Adams KM editor. Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders. 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 1996;p. 102–117
  32. Gualtieri T, Johnson L, Benedict K. Reliability and validity of a new computerized cognitive assessment battery. Baltimore, MD: International Neuropsychological Society Annual Meeting; February 4–7, 2004;
  33. Gualtieri T, Johnson L. Differentiating between mild cognitive impairment and early dementia with a new, computerized neurocognitive assessment battery (Symposium on Dementia Screening, Alzheimer's Association International Conference on Prevention of Dementia, for Washington, DC). 2005;
  34. Skinner H, Pakula A. Challenge of computers in psychological assessment. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1986;17:44–50
  35. Galvin J, Roe C, Coats M, Morris J. Patient's rating of cognitive ability: using the AD8, a brief informant interview, as self-rating tool to detect dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:725–730
  36. Boustani M, Callahan C, Unverzagt F. Implementing a screening and diagnosis program for dementia in primary care. J Gen Int Med. 2005;20:572–577
  37. Ardern M, Mayou R, Feldman E, Hawton K. Cognitive impairment in the elderly medically ill: how often is it missed. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1993;8:929–937
  38. Teresi JA, Holmes D, Koren MJ, Dichter E, Ramirez M, Fairchild S. Prevalence estimates of cognitive impairment in medical model adult day health care programs. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:283–290
  39. Mate-Kole C, Major A, Lenzer I, Connoly J. Validation of the Quick Cognitive Screening Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:867–875
  40. McFie J. Assessment of organic intellectual impairment. Oxford: Academic Pr; 1975;
  41. Unsworth CA, Lovell R, Terrington N, Thomas S. Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52:57–74
  42. Keys R. Treating traumatic brain injury. http://www.mgh.harvard.edu/forum/TraumaticBrainInjuryF/1998;Accessed November 25, 2003
  43. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–944
  44. Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies (Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop). Neurology. 1993;43:250–260
  45. Warrington E, Taylor A. The contribution of right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex. 1973;9:159–164
  46. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. The practice of neuropsychological assessment. In:  Lezak MD,  Howieson DB,  Loring DW editor. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed.. New York: Oxford Univ Pr; 2004;p. 3–14
  47. Reitan R, Davison L. Clinical neuropsychology: current status and applications. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1974;
  48. Borkowski J, Benton A, Spreen O. Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 1967;5:135–140
  49. Pfeiffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982;37:323–329
  50. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:644–647
  51. Hosmer C, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley; 2000;
  52. Parker C, Philip I, Sarai M, Rauf A. Cognitive screening for people from minority ethnic backgrounds. Nurs Older People. 2007;18:31–36
  53. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev. 2003;13:181–197
  54. Higginson C, Arnett P, Voss W. The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;11:185–204

 Supported by the Central Connecticut State University American Association of University Professors.

 No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

PII: S0003-9993(09)00285-8

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.007

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume 90, Issue 9 , Pages 1469-1477 , September 2009